Monday, December 21, 2009

Silent Diffusion

Given the institutionalized anti-White antipathy and bias of "our" "civil society" and the closely related ZOG (AKA the system), we are not duty or honor bound to sacrifice our personal, group, descendants' or ancestors' interests by recklessly upholding a traditional White idealistic sense of honor, honesty and fair play. Doing so would allow anti-White haters who fight dirty to twist our virtues against us for base and genocidal ends. Our honor should be reserved for our people and given only to those treating us with honor. Those treating us in good faith and honor should receive the same from us, including Blacks and Jews.

For example, right now many instititions including the military, deliberately weed out pro-White activists while allowing non-White activists, supremacists and gang members including some Jewish supremacists with their primary loyalty to other Jews and Israel instead of "America". If the system is rigged against us, it has no legitimacy and we have no obligation to weaken ourselves by scrupulously giving honesty to a dishonorable and dishonest system.

We Need Lots-O-Infiltrators!

We need many pro-Whites embedded within existing institutions to gather intelligence, leak evil or embarrassing data, oppose or undermine anti-White actions and policies, sow discord among our enemies and so on. Some of them are already in place but aren't yet pro-White, while others will infiltrate in the future. Many of these Whites may need to keep quiet or even directly lie about their pro-White commitment. This would not be dishonorable. This country was created by our forefathers for their posterity and has been hijacked by an evil anti-White system undeserving of our support unless it abandons its anti-White oppression and stops promoting long-term White genocide. A small set of key infiltrators in the right institutions, both public and private, could expose tremendous amounts of malevolent anti-White scheming and action by the system as well as lots of highly embarrassing dirt, corruption and abuses of power.

Just imagine all the anti-White directives and work products used in the advertising industry, mainstream media and Hollywood. I suspect audio recordings of some of their meetings would be highly revealing to the sheeple, kinda like the denouement of A Face In The Crowd (1957), an excellent anti-White, Jewish supremacist classic deserving close study directed by Elia Kazan, starring Andy Griffith and with writing and screenwriter credits by Jewish Commie Budd Schulberg (I won't give away the ending because it's a major spoiler. Watch it if you haven't seen it. I have little doubt it is in complete accord with how our elites view the rest of us).

New Leaders and Crypto Pro-Whites

We need genuinely talented leaders who arise without any significant baggage or taint. I mean no disrespect meant to our early vanguard leaders who had difficult task of challenging the system when most of us were thoroughly brainwashed, especially before the internet broke the media monopoly.

Some pro-Whites must decide early on to keep their commitment hidden so they can best serve our interests. This is a perfectly honorable choice until we've reclaimed our legitimate rights and reversed anti-White oppression.

Most of Us are Probably Tagged Already

Unfortunately I suspect almost everybody currently in the pro-White movement, even passively as an internet reader, has probably already been tagged by ZOG given the extensive domestic surveillance system unless they've taken extraordinary efforts to mask their online identity, like never using their home internet connection for anything WNA-related, using a portable device to hook into randomly varying public internet access with care taken not to be caught on video surveillance, shielding the device while not in use, possibly combined with using an encrytped proxy (which ones are trustworthy?), and working at home on a 100% internet-isolated computer that encrypts all sensitive data, etc. I doubt more than 0.1% of WNAs (White Nationalists and Advocates) have done this kind of scrupulously careful security protocol. Most of us are way too lazy for that. Even worse, as we began our movement into White Nationalism and Advocacy, we left a telltale traceable internet-trail moving to pro-White, anti-Jewish-supremacist knowledge that will likely be data mineable by ZOG. Even entities without ZOG's full power are probably using many of the internet tracking services like gravatar and statcounter to piece together browsing patterns by correlating timestamped IP data from many of these sources to build up a surprisingly detailed collection of browsing habits. Some entities probably have staff infiltrated into various important companies that give them privileged access to what should technically be private records, like your ISP. I suspect the power is rarely used overtly so they don't tip off the rubes on how little privacy there really is on the internet. This is my speculation, not certain knowledge.

I kinda like this WNA acronym, pronounced "WIN-uh", like winner with a Southern accent. It's also resembles "DNA" suggesting the biological foundation of racial differences instead of the fraud of supposed White oppression of non-Whites. It can also be pronounced "WHY-nuh', like whiner, but I also believe this works to our advantage because it exposes our enemies contempt for our people and their legitimate rights by belittling our just complaints for anyone that values objectivity and fairness.

For those publishing text on the internet, care would have to be taken to use stock language that diverges from your normal idioms and other discernable patterns that will likely be data mined and correlated with known communications, possibly including voice communications that are mass-intercepted, automatically translated and available for analysis and correlation. Technology is enabling a nightmarish police state with staggering power. Many groups beyond pro-Whites are also opposed to this emerging tyranny and we should join with them to reduce trust and legitimacy for this deeply un-American police state being foisted upon us through false-flag terror and manipulation. The only way to reduce the power of this illegitimate tyranny is to create significant mass dissent among the public, elites and employees within the police state and its supporting institutions. We must stop believing the constant little lies and falling for the big lies.

We Need a Safe Way to Spread our Message and Knowledge

So we need lots more pro-Whites and we need some to be untrackable. Also, given the oppressive political correctness and corporate neo-serfdom that effectively weakens or destroys free-speech rights for many folks, we need a way to spread our message convincingly without these cautious folks feeling like they're risking their livelihood or family's security.

One approach to do this is what can be called silent diffusion.

The basic idea is we provide large sets of high-quality, pro-White works in various media that can be spread around hand-to-hand in trusted personal networks (and electronically as well) so that the recipients can have a fairly self-contained set of material, including quick, high-level overviews, detailed supporting documentation for those so inclined and a full-range of related materials so that the viewer or reader can spend months digging through our arguments, proof, humor, videos, audios, etc, including looking at conflicting arguments without ever having to touch the internet and get labelled. There can be different subscriptions aimed at different audiences, e.g. working class versus professional, average college graduates, intellectuals, women, children, and there may even be some segmentation for different White subcultures, generations, etc. Given that CD-ROMs and DVD-drives are so pervasive and that these media hold huge amounts of data, it really wouldn't take too many releases to include lots of good videos, audio, books, articles, etc. Different audiences may all be accommodated through choosing a the desired initial view of the same disk. DVDs can fit over 4 GB which can fit hundreds of books, thousands of articles with plenty of room for lots of audio and good quality video.

These packages can also be spread to strangers, left at public places, sent to various important audiences and elites. For example, the guy who created the extremely thought-provoking Holocaust Revisionist film One Third of the Holocaust and some others, has a page where he urges his readers to independently help spread his careful analysis that casts doubt on various specific aspects of the orthodox Holocaust narrative to various elites like 100 history professors. We can adapt this idea of marketing our ideas to prospects like non-ideologue teachers, small businessmen, patriotards, libertarians, mainstream Christians, Christian Zionists, etc. Some of these different audiences might have specially constructed materials to gracefully address their typical exising brainwashing.

Creating a DVD and a page or two of introduction with a quick description of how to set of an internet-isolated computer might persuade a timid White to broach a taboo they are otherwise fearful to confront. Creating and distributing these items is fairly inexpensive and can be done by independent individuals as well as groups. We need lots of independent cells and individuals as well as increasing organized and linked groups.

Another benefit of Silent Diffusion Distributions is their ability to spread underground communications if they manage to shutdown the internet. We can create new communication channels off their radars.

An Aside about Holocaust Revisionism

By the way, every WNA should investigate Holocaust Revisionism because there is a strong possiblity that significant elements of the Holocaust orthodoxy are false or exaggerated. I realize this is a controversial topic and some public WNAs like Kevin MacDonald might avoid this topic to avoid undermining his important contributions from further vilification by our shitty oppressive society (SOS). Fair enough. We need to allow broad cooperation without petty sniping since we are so marginalized by "our" evil "civil society". But in our hearts and minds we should strive for the truth even if our corrupt society is dominated by Big Lies and holds the truth in contempt.

Jews are only entitled to the truth. Nothing more and nothing less.

If they are being significantly dishonest about several major claims of the Holocaust it is, by far, the greatest slander and "blood libel" in history. Their constant efforts to destroy freedom of speech and inquiry by imprisioning Holocaust Revisionists strongly implies they can't honestly confront the many calm, detailed arguments of the Revisionists so they choose to shut down the normal approach to examining historical events through free and open inquiry.

Their major goal is to intimidate most people, especially our intellectual elites, from considering any challenge to the orthodoxy by showing the severe punishment dissenters receive.

I believe any strong attempt to stifle and stigmatize debate or dissent should act as a powerful marker that a Big Lie may be operating, which means the subject needs careful, open scrutiny. 911 is another probable Big Lie that all WNAs should investigate. It's especially important because if there are entities engaging in false-flag operations, they will likely continue doing them, probably escalating them to horrific proportions to dazzle the masses with fear to consolidate their power and control by completing a full-blown tyrannical police state. These topics would be perfect for Silent Diffusion Distributions since they are so taboo.

Different Subscriptions for Different Starting Points

Distinct subscriptions can target different degrees of initial brainwashing so we bring along newbies gently with maybe one or two additional tiers to get the full ugly truth. Newbies need to deeply understand the massive internal contradictions and hypocrisies of the system and how it isn't the fair, idealistic system it pretends to be. Step two will be to begin better understanding the ugly truth and how it got that way.

Using Our Time More Efficiently

One problem with reading the raw material of WNA daily or weekly is the significant effort of sifting through lots of redundancy, venting, disinformation or COINTELPRO subversion to find the novel (for the reader) rare jewels and more common solid gems. One challenge is that many good insights already exist in many sources that most of us aren't familiar with. This is why our movement needs more mediation and organization to create efficient collections of the best thought without forcing the user to read hundreds of full-length books and tens of thousands of articles and blog posts. We have relatively little available collective time, ability and wealth resources, so we don't need everyone trying to read a lot of relatively abstruse academic articles when a mediator can provide a reader's digest summary for a general audience if needed. Those extra five, ten or twenty hours per week for thousands of potential activists and contributers can be better spent on other pragmatic tasks that advance our movement.

Our Highest Priority: Education and Persuasion to Increase our Movement

Probably the single most important activity at this phase of our movement is the dissemination of our educational and persuasive works to increase the size and influence of our movement. As it expands it will pull more resources and energy into the movement which will provide more rapid growth through positive feedback. This is the core of our changing the culture.

Some effort should also be dedicated to filling out and debating various aspects of WNA ideologies and doctrines, although as one Occidental Commenter (? Svigor) noted in the recent past, there is no reason we must decide everything up front. We can defer some of the details to future context and situations. We don't need to create a doctrinaire, rigid ideology.

Let me be clear. These abstruse academic articles are usually great stuff for their niche. We need to have a few experts and laymen covering every major topic, but they also need to fit it into an overall general context and mediate it for the wider non-specialist elite audience and possibly a general audience because for most of our activists, those extra ten, twenty or thirty minutes per person multiplied by five, ten or twenty articles per week multiplied by thousands or tens of thousands of activists would be better spent specializing on other activities. Unlike the anti-White mediators of the MSM and Hollywood, I have a much greater trust in WNA mediators. There is a lot of redundancy across various commentary and news sites. By creating a somewhat unified and organized collection we can dramatically increase learning efficiency. We can also create archives of news stories, outrages, etc, organized by category, time, author, etc and powerfully searchable and viewable using standard tools or custom software we adapt or create. This way people can catch up on news at their leisure and systematize their knowledge of key details and issues.

Hopefully we'll spark more synergy and cooperation and greater mastery of the ever expanding, organized, "official" WNA body of knowledge.

For these special distributions, we would gather all the best stuff, refine it and package it to be more efficient for various audiences to use most profitably. Although comment sections at blogs can be fantastic resources, they can chew up a lot of time because of the lower than optimal signal-to-noise ratio. Certain annoying commenters are almost certainly anti-White infiltrators trying to undermine effective pro-Whites through disinformation, subversion and demoralization.

By using some improved software tools, databases, etc, we can extract the gems into a concise, high-octane collection of our best stuff. Many Whites are busy people who need this info highly distilled and packaged in the most accessible, persuasive format.

We could instruct people how to set up a safe internet-isolated computer and use encryption, so they can accumulate a collection of taboo data with much lower risk. Then periodically we can put out new releases. We would use signing tools using private keys and published checksums so recipients would know that the distributions are authentic.

Networks of Hidden Readers

The goal is for a relatively smaller number of exposed people to pass distributions around to several hidden readers each, with some of these hidden readers repeating the process to other hidden readers.

Ideas for a Safe Internet-Isolated Computer

To create a safe internet-isolated computer an old 3-6 year old machine running Linux or an old Windows is perfectly adequate. New stuff can be installed by using a USB drive or CD/DVD. Basically never directly plug it into the internet. Ever. Make sure it doesn't have wireless networking hardware or at least disable it. I recommend Linux or a BSD Unix. They're free and open-source so you don't have to fiddle with Microshit's licenses, activation or crapware. Linux and BSD are free with lots of good, free, open-source apps, including multimedia, office and graphics, and some of the distributions have gotten much easier to use for Windows users, like Ubuntu (if you can avoid barfing when you see the race mixing picture on their website).

This is a starting point. We'd want to get the input from a bunch of folks and look for weak points and add more detail. A lot of the details can probably be gotten from existing non-racial tech sites.

Creating a Mass Movement

One goal is to create a much larger audience receptive and knowledgeable of our ideas, arguments, facts and media products to create mass to overturn the anti-White oppression currently dominating "our" "civil society". As we persuade a mass audience we can bring more resources into WNA including volunteerism, subscriptions, donations, estate gifts and the presence of our masses, elites, winners and those embedded in the system.

The work of creating this kind of professional, distilled distribution of the best of WNA is the sort constructive effort we could collaborate on over the internet to begin changing the culture to a more just one. I'd rather spend more time doing concrete, constructive activities rather than reading an excess of relatively theoretical or technical works or articles. Those works certainly have their place but I think some are best as a niche that we just need a few scholars and lay experts tussling with, who can then distill the important points down to the non-experts or masses.

I'm planning to discuss this need for greater organization, collaboration and practical efforts in my next post. In general we need to take WNA to the next level where we are busy doing lots of constructive activities where we specialize and coordinate our efforts intelligently, so that we can achieve many concrete goals in parallel while efficiently using our resources.

As we build up our alternative media and culture production and create a mass audience of hundreds of thousands and then millions and beyond, gaining knowledge, commitment and support of WNA, it will be much easier for this information to be widely distributed with less traceability. We can bring down overt anti-White oppression because Whites will start proudly telling the anti-Whites to fuck off because they're the real racists.

We must become the change we desire.

Thanks anti-White leftists. Great line! Will do!

Thursday, November 19, 2009

The Existing "Leadership" of Whites is Inauthentic and Illegitimate

The current "leadership" of Whites in "our" "civil society" is illegitimate and inauthentic. They've been turned against their own people and heritage through the inculcation of an anti-White false consciousness.

This "leadership" is not explicitly White because it is taboo for Whites to EVER specifically advocate for White interests. This is just one of the many double standards where Whites are held to different and "higher" standards than EVERY other group: Whites are supposed to be post-racial and put other groups' interests above their own. In fact they can't even publically discuss having interests without being smeared as "White supremacists". The only allowable public discourse by Whites as Whites is degrading self-abasement. We're not even supposed to THINK about having interests as Whites. Instead we're supposed to be patriotard "Americans" who care about what's good for "America", even as Amerikwa morphs into an alien Orwellian totalitarianism that despises our people, culture and heritage. Naturally none of these post-racial rules apply to all the cherished non-Whites who can aggressively and openly pursue their group interests with the full support and encouragement of "our" "civil society" which "celebrates" them, unlike Whites, who are officially reviled. Non-Whites are also gaining individual rights superior to Whites, as affirmative action and hate crime laws illustrate.

The US is literally a non-White supremacist system and if we dare speak out against this injustice or our very deliberately planned dispossession, we are slandered as "White supremacists".

Our "leadership" isn't even implicitly White because that implies they would be at least slightly pro-White, if only unconsciously or tacitly due to the oppressive anti-White control system dominating Amerikwa. Sadly, "our" "leadership" is actually anti-White, both implicitly and explicity. It is de rigueur for White "leaders" to extravagently rhapsodize on multiculturalism, racial inclusiveness and diversity while deliberately ignoring, belittling or condemning their Whiteness. Such White elites are inauthentic because they are brainwashed with an anti-White ideology that they continually kowtow to, glorify and strengthen instead of resisting or subverting. Therefore, they have no authority or legitimacy as White leaders. One of our most important goals must be to reclaim our voices and interests as Whites and spread awareness that Whites infected with anti-White false consciousness are unworthy frauds undeserving of respect, trust or the delegation of power by our people. They are White Uncle Toms and Judas goats.

Admittedly, some of these leaders, like most Whites, are in a difficult position, because the system severly punishes pro-White rhetoric or action. Hopefully as we begin transforming the culture through creating alternative institutions that gain credibility, some of the currently intimidated leadership will find their White voices, accelerating the legitimate reclaiming of our interests and share of power.

Our non-crypto alternative institutions must continually expose the anti-White agenda of our current institutions and "leadership" class and strive to erode their legitimacy of the system and its "leaders".

As two very insightful pro-White thinkers, Tanstaafl and Fred Scrooby, who comments frequently at Occidental Dissent and Majority Rights, have explained very clearly and convincingly, these people actually support White genocide: they think Whites have no right to exist in the future and look forward to the day when Whites are mixed away into irreversible racial oblivion. Their desires and policies are literally genocidal.

Whites can be logically consistent and morally upright by supporting the self-determination and survival of both ourselves and other groups. We should build friendly alliances with any willing allies, including non-Whites, to oppose the globalist juggernaut that threatens most nations and peoples worldwide, including ourselves. We should propose healthy, mutually beneficial, non-exploitative relationships between nations and peoples. Just because we're pro-White doesn't mean we're anti-non-White. There are many potential allies who are sick of the corrosive effects of forced globalism and imperialism. Just like multiculturalism, there can be a good globalism, but it would be quite different than the reigning system of meddling, manipulation, coercision, exploitation and violence. For reference, a good multiculturalism respects the automony of different peoples and encourages mutually beneficial, respectful and voluntary interaction to whatever degree each nation desires.

We should also look for allies within Amerikwa disenchanted with the current system and who desire change. This includes secessionists, libertarians, non-White nationalists, anti-imperialists, anti-globalists, anarchists, etc. Realistically, Amerikwa is too far gone for Whites to recover our historic White nation throughout the entire US, but if we can get some decent fraction for ourselves and our posterity that would be much better than what is planned for us, namely effective racial genocide, the continued campaign of anti-White demonization, the theft of White wealth and productivity, and kulak-like scapegoating for any failure to achieve post-racial Utopia, which is absolutely certain to occur because its equality ideology is based on lies that violate the laws of nature, accompanied by persecution and probably mass executions, among many other attacks and injustices against Whites.

An important factor in the perversion of White "leadership" has been the undeserved "White guilt" gradually imposed on most Whites and their trusted institutions for at least the last seventy years. This ridiculously overplayed scam springs from many sources, including some mostly internal Whites sources like 1) innate White character and thought processes where we try to be fair and open-minded about some historical excesses against other groups, 2) aspects of Christianity enabling its current transformation to promoting multicultural and White guilt shibboleths, and 3) White radicalism in various guises, like the Transcendentalists. But probably the greatest single factor has been the long-running campaign of anti-White subversion orchestrated by various powerful Jewish sources, including organizations and movements having their minions positioned within many power structures, both formal and informal. We need to destroy the hold of "White guilt" over most Whites through concrete projects and actions.

We also need to change White culture so Whites stop caring so much whether other groups "like" them or not or whether Whites are being "fair enough" to non-Whites. Alternative churches need to arise that reject modern mainstream Christianity with its promotion of White guilt and groveling while traditional anti-White churches need to lose many members and much wealth when they push their anti-White agenda.

The left and the cultural Marxists have given us a powerful set of tools to critique their own illegitimate power over Whites. Basically all of their ideas and rhetoric can be slightly tweaked and applied right back at them: power, supremacism, bigotry, privilege, authenticity, colonialism, identity, false consciousness, etc, etc, etc. At least it will work for most Whites who still believe in facts, logic, truth, objectivity and fairness, like many Whites do.

The main reason the anti-White multicultural left befuddles so many Whites is the long-running delusional "reality" constructed by Hollywood and the mainstream media combined with their lock over other critical institutions of influence. As people see the products of alternate institutions that accurately reflect reality and directly confront many taboos, the anti-Whites seemingly iron grip will soften and crumble like sand.

As a brief example, they like to claim that Whites are supposedly all-powerful and frequently oppress non-Whites. A close examination of this claim will reveal its nearly complete fallaciousness and duplicity. Many grim examples of White murders, rape, dishonest one-sided anti-White media, exploitation, inability to advocate for their own interests, persecution when merely advocating for their survival, constant demonization by "our" "civil society" among many other concrete examples will prove the evil Orwellian inversion of this allegation.

So true reality is radically different for those who don't harbor a burning hatred of Whites. This was the barest of high-level overviews of a response. We need to create many forms of rebuttal and dissent to their lies and propaganda which I'll discuss in more detail in my next post.

The goal of Whites should be to divorce themselves from this evil, anti-White system so we can pursue our own self-determination without bothering or being bothered by other peoples, especially anti-White haters. Any attempt to deny Whites any privileges granted to others is non-White supremacism: i.e. supremacism by non-Whites directed against Whites. One big lie they've succeeded in foisting on most Americans is that anyone merely concerned with White survival or advocacy is White supremacist, which is deeply dishonest, non-White supremacist and genocidal. White supremacism has been demonized thousands of times by Hollywood and the media as retrograde, psychotic, evil, fascist, nazi, ku klux klan, redneck, moronic, perverted and pretty much every other epithet under the sun. So when they slander someone with this usually false label that they've invested tremendous resources into constructing and propagandizing, they aim to shut down rational thought by provoking fear of taboo transgression and punishment, revulsion, discomfort, contempt and hatred, among many other negative and taboo markers associated with "White supremacism".

It's time to deconstruct the entire anti-White ediface. Let a thousand venus flytraps bloom!

It is 100% against White interests to have ALL of our homelands flooded with non-Whites until we become persecuted minorities in our own, former homes. Any system that pushes this policy on our people is illegitimate and immoral. There's a remote chance that the existing systems in our countries can be changed from their anti-White genocidal course through reforming the system, which we should attempt while concurrently preparing for other contingencies since the future is uncertain.

We have an excellent role model in the Jewish community which has literally thousands of organizations pursuing their interersts, including long-term strategic planning and Jewish genetic survival. Anything Jews or any other group are allowed or encouraged to do is also perfectly acceptable for Whites. To believe otherwise is a form of non-White supremacy treating Whites as second-class citizens or subhumans. The mindlessly accepted anti-White racism must be challenged. Since this pervasive anti-White racism is part of an extensive campaign waged using all the levers of power in our society, its creation and maintenance have been a carefully constructed "labor of hate"; its architects and functionaries were anything but mindless themselves. We must do many concrete tasks to begin changing this and fully assert our interests without guilt, shame or submissiveness.

I have hope that a good fraction of our own status-conscious elites, especially the younger ones, currently brainwashed into feelings of White guilt or subservience can be jolted out of this inauthentic, false consciousness by confronting them with the severe contradictions of the current anti-White ideology and inducing feelings of low status and inferiority by their being duped by this ridiculously illogical and unethical farrago of anti-White hatred and false history. We need to mess with their status obsessions by pulling the rug out of their pseudo-superiority. They're a bunch of dumbfucks for falling for such obvious scam!

In truth, it's easy to fall for the brainwashing, given the coordinated propaganda campaign emanating from the commanding heights of our society. By further building and popularizing our neutral and pro-White institutions, particularly the cultural, media, educational and organizational ones, more people will awaken from the Orwellian nightmare of Amerikwa. It won't be so easy to fall for the scam when there are thousands of cultural and media products that expose it from hundreds of different angles and millions of people are discussing the anti-White matrix.

As the consequences of the inept and corrupt "leadership" of "our" country over the last several decades finally arrive with the de facto destruction of the dollar, unwinnable, unending imperialist wars of aggression, the loss of our much of our industrial base, dwindling native ownership of American assets, greater domestic chaos and violence with fewer safe havens, the impoverishment of our working and middle class while "coincidentally" the wealthy, globalist elites loot the American taxpayer, among many other disasters, many more Whites will be searching for answers for their miserable situations and shattered faith. We must provide detailed, accurate and persuasive answers and workable solutions. Giving more power to the rotten, corrupt system and its puppetmasters most responsible for getting us into this mess is NOT the solution! They had their thousands of chances and they continually chose corruption, exploitation, lies, short-sightedness, stupidity and malevolent anti-White aggression. All the hell and despoiling this country has and will go through will have been completely avoidable. The current system and its promoters must be completely and deservedly discredited.

America was lulled into a stupor over sixty years ago and has been replaced by an alien body snatcher that superficially resembles traditional America but inwardly embodies an Orwellian inversion of its traditional values, beliefs, culture, law, institutions and people. The Stars and Stripes might as well be a Hammer and Sickle with a Star of David for what its now represents in ideology and behavior.

We must gain a deep understanding of how America, and the West in general, and their respective institutions were perverted so thoroughly against their own people, since we want to create new robust systems resistant to such corruption over the long term. This is one of thousands of concrete projects that Whites must pursue thoughtfully through improved coordination and organization which I plan to discuss next.

The era of White kowtowing and endless apologies is coming to a close within a few decades. Whites must put their own interests first, just like everyone else. "White guilt" is just a cynical scam designed to bleed, manipulate and scapegoat Whites. It was a great con while it lasted but its practitioners better start planning for a new line of work. Those unsalvageable Whites committed to White degradation can pursue their madness in multicultural cesspools without the rest of us and with the recognition by authentic and healthy Whites that they are spiritually and psychologically deformed trolls utterly unfit to lead or speak for Whites. They and their perverted institutions can wither as authentic Whites withdraw their consent, support and presence. They may have varying motives: outright corruption, self-hatred or naivete. It doesn't matter. What does matter is they have absolutely no moral authority or authenticity. Not one shred. They will be relics of an era of malevolent manipulation against Whites that must be well-understood and guarded against in the future.

Friday, September 4, 2009

Black365 and Non-White Supremacism

James Edwards had a piece recently about McDonalds and their promotion of a program and web site named black365 "celebrating Black culture ...".

McDonalds pioneered multicultural advertising decades ago, particularly supporting a strong pro-Black identity. We should start a new healthy restaurant chain called MacDonalds catering to Whites. The golden arches could be replaced by a big White W. :)

I fully agree with James Edwards' point about the massive double standards employed by multinational corporations and other institutions that promote non-White identity while NEVER doing the same for Whites. About the only time corporations or advertisers explicitly mention White identity is to mock or subvert it, e.g. Whites can't dance or Whites are uptight.

Far more common is the implicit treatment of Whites through subtexts which serves three major functions. First, they constantly denigrate White identity, history, culture, attitudes, character and peoplehood, unlike non-White groups, which are respected and shown positively (the only exception being Arabs and Muslims who are sometimes demonized: guess why?). The goal is clearly to destroy any explicitly White group identity and self-esteem. Second, they illustrate "proper" thinking and behavior to define the bounds of accepted White identity. Whites not accepting their assigned safe and submissive role are shown as evil and contemptible (nazis, klansmen, haters, militia "nuts", etc). Everyone gets the message, if only subconsciously. Third, they train non-Whites, including recent immigrants, to see Whites as a hated class to be attacked and displaced in the future.

The only accepted "traditional" White identity is to be a patriotard tool of warmongering Zionists and globalists who push other people around in their own countries because the whole world really, really wants to be like America! Support "democracy"!!!

These subtexts are literally millions of subtle cues embedded throughout the totality of "our" cultural and entertainment programming. Even though no one sees all or even most of the full set of programming, the average person grows up seeing at least tens of thousands of these anti-White subtexts in thousands of different programs. They become signficant because instead of being randomly distributed in a balanced way, they are systematically biased against Whites. Just watch TV on a typical night and you'll see dozens of examples.

The anti-White bias is obvious by comparing the corresponding treatment of non-Whites and Jews (Jews are exquisitely sensitive to the slightest of slights) using the "identity interchange" test. If the commonly accepted anti-White subtexts had the identities exchanged with a non-White, the non-White advocates would be livid with rage at the racist propaganda being spread about their people! It's great for Whites though!

Ultimately they want to program Whites (and non-Whites) to behave as servants to their agendas. Our children are cut off from the brilliant accomplishments of their ancestors and the heights and nobility of a healthy White culture and society. Instead they're encouraged to be docile little consumers buying corporate junk manufactured overseas from corporate retail zones next to corporate-built suburbs mostly built with cheap illegal alien labor. These suburbs are meant to be a tacit place of safety using wealth as a barrier instead of ethnocentrism, until the next round of immigration and Black criminal subclass resettlement starts the process over again, leading to fat profits for the controllers managing the process.

Isn't modern America such a wonderful land of opportunity? Our founding fathers would be so proud!

These constant media images of Whites are a crucial pillar in creating and enforcing anti-White double standards in our "civil society". The news, entertainment and advertising propaganda machines wield massive influence over most sectors of our society including a significant fraction of our intellectual elites.

One current repulsive example of White-demeaning advertisting is this AT&T commercial where a gay-seeming White guy apparently lives in a big house in a suburban neighborhood surrounded by a carefully chosen multicultural crew consisting of a normal Asian man and three children: a Latino boy and White girl who are silent, and an Asian girl, the center and leader of the children. The Asian girl plays the role of a ghetto-speaking Black woman from a soap opera because the gay White guy has asked the neighborhood kids to help him "catch up on his soaps" because he's already apparently recording two other shows during the airtime of the soaps.

This is the ideal White man according to our cultural programmers: one who won't reproduce, will happily acquiesce in his people's displacement (and isn't even aware he's part of a people other than "American"), is happily multiculturalist, lives a hedonistic lifestyle, is practically a women (and won't be hunting, fishing, owning guns or have any survival skills) and enthusiastically submits to brainwashing by our elite masters.

Why do we give our money to these anti-White corporations?

Isn't it great that Whites have such a great sense of humor that they're OK with being constantly ridiculed unlike all the other groups that demand respect?

No it's not. It's because Whites are cowed into submission by an evil, anti-White, uncivil society that despises them but that controls most levers of power and uses them aggressively to oppress Whites, attacks their identity, legally steals their wealth and transfers it to non-White colonizers, ungrateful Blacks or various corrupt forces, and then tars any White dissenters and resisters as "racists", "bigots", "fascists", "neo-nazis" and "white supremacists".

Ultimately, it's perfectly reasonable that Jews, Blacks and others feel racial solidarity and behave ethnocentrically and even that powerful organizations pander to them.

What's NOT OK is that Whites engaging in logically equivalent beliefs and activism are falsely smeared as Nazis, Klansmen or White supremacists by non-White supremacists, especially by powerful and wealthy Jewish and crypto-Jewish organizations and their toadies throughout our "civil society", including the government, corporations, advertising, Hollywood, the MSM and the educational industrial complex. And for almost everyone in the US the propaganda machine has reinforced THOUSANDS of times that those labels represent the worst possible evil.

Whites must stop tolerating these double standards against us and only us. We need to make it crystal clear that anything but full acceptance of White advocacy and ethnocentrism while all others are both tolerated and encouraged is NON-WHITE SUPREMACISM. I googled this term a while back and found a few scattered references to it so this is an existing but rare concept. It deserves to become just as mainstream as "white supremacism".

We must start calling things by their true names instead of participating in the swarm of lies and obfuscations that enable the anti-White Matrix to pass itself off as a colorblind society that is supposedly just.

Colorblind is a con.

America is anti-White and non-white supremacist.

Try these on for size: Black supremacism, Jewish supremacism, Hispanic Supremacism, Asian supremacism. When non-White advocates believe they have more rights than Whites they are SUPREMACISTS. They need to start hearing this accurate description of their rhetoric and behavior. Oppressed Whites need to learn this tool of understanding and self defense.

While the anti-White activists bring up false anti-White doctrines like "White Privilege" the reality of our society, when normalizing for ability and behavior, is "non-White Privilege", especially Black and Jewish Privilege. Whenever anyone tries to fling the pathetic accusation of White privilege, Whites should immediately point to the success of groups like Blacks, Asians and Jews which typically have better outcomes than Whites per capita, especially Jews, whose outcomes are staggeringly higher than Whites in terms of wealth, elite education, media ownership and influence, academic position, campaign finance, elite government positions, etc. Hmmm, how come stories about Jewish influence NEVER EVER appear in the mainstream media while LOTS of anti-White or White-critical stories DO? It must be all that White Privilege typically taught by Jewish or non-White professors and activists. It was enlightening to see the Whiteness Studies conference that had a Shabbat dinner on Friday night in their official schedule as well as a roster containing a majority of Jewish and non-White participants.

When a large enough group of Whites drop out of the anti-White Matrix and create alternative institutions that empower and protect Whites, their identity, history, culture and peoplehood, the existing institutions will be forced to either adapt or reveal their raw hatred and oppression of Whites. This large group must be led by a vanguard. Some early pioneers have been at it for decades. Now more of us are joining their efforts. We need to keep widening the circle and to tolerate different kinds of pro-Whites, including the shaky ones in the middle starting with pro-White training wheels.

Part of the problem is that Whites have been so deracinated (cut off from their roots) and indoctrinated in White-self-hatred that our culture and identity is a shambles for the vast majority of our brethren. We probably can't fully recover what we once had but we can draw from the best of our heritage and forge a new spirit and culture for our people. We also might not be able to create a monolithic, unitary culture, but if we have several White cultures that mostly share a core of common values across different belief systems, that will be infinitely preferable to our current atomization and deracination. The largest split among pro-Whites is probably between Christians and non-Christians. We should not worry about all Whites having to fit some specific ideology or set of values. Support pro-White diversity!

Some Whites will always be implacable enemies. Fine. Let them pursue their suicidal path in their own spaces and we can pursue our destiny separately. Good riddance. Divorce is the solution.

In time we can create a White Renaissance.

It will take much time and effort to counteract the massive 24x7 anti-White control program that's been operating unimpeded for many decades.

Essentially every piece of our "civil society" must have alternative institutions by and for Whites promoting our interests. I've already discussed alternative institutions in detail regarding higher education in a non-racial manner and alternative media promoting White advocacy. I also explored White separation.

We also need institutions and organizations that subvert the existing ones while not being rabidly or even overtly pro-White. We need to recruit Whites from the middle and take them a step at a time to full-blown White advocacy, ethnocentrism and nationalism. A major attack vector are those areas of our "civil society" that promote lies, anti-White bias or non-White supremacism. Trust in these institutions is already low. When average people see professional quality stories with fully documented details available that expose the lies, distortions and propaganda of the current system, cynicism and distrust will strengthen dramatically and faith and trust will be transferred to the new alternative sources. Anti-White crime is an massive opportunity that needs to be exploited to destroy trust in the current lying system. It wouldn't be an issue if they weren't such vicious lying anti-White bigots so they deserve no sympathy.

A major barrier to building pro-White institutions is the current dominance of anti-White racism by "civil society". Budding pro-Whites are assaulted by powerful and wealthy groups like the ADL and $PLC and many other groups coordinated with allies in Hollywood, the MSM, academia, government, corporations and other commanding heights in our society. It will be a long-term struggle to gain our rights and justice. We already have some organizations working for our interests, so let's support them however we can, even if only to spread awareness through personal connections.

There are other areas I'd like to discuss, including my long-promised alternative cultural post, which is one of the most important alternatives needed because it is the most powerful force brainwashing most Whites. The sheer repetition of anti-White and pro-multicultural ideology over the full lifetime of most citizens, including the numerous subtle subtexts, is difficult for most people to escape. But imagine a full offering of cultural programming that is pro-White with many of the subtexts and meta-messages inverted from their anti-White bigotry. I believe when many Whites are exposed to hundreds and thousands of hours of pro-White cultural programming, White advocacy will become a mass movement including both our average and cognitive elite populations.

It can happen in stages too, where a small nucleus of Whites create and distribute this pro-White content and then gain an modest audience that then grows as the truth, hope and justice of our side inspire more and more Whites to escape their brainwashing.

We must build our institutions and their broad acceptance piece-by-piece from the bottom up. We can use our talent and spirit to create something authentic even if we have limited resources compared to our oppressors. Some of these pieces are already in place, like some of the organizations I link to. We must start within our own families, friends and communities. We must contest the universally accepted anti-White bigotry and those who promote it.

The future is uncertain. We must work to prepare ourselves for any contingency that comes our way.

We'll know we're made progress when large business interests start fearing the anger the White community and pander to us the way they pander to non-Whites.

nativeamerican365, black365, jew365, raza365, asian365 are all fully supported by "our" "civil society".

white365 must be too.

Saturday, July 25, 2009

An Outstanding Documentary: A Conversation About Race

I've just seen the new documentary A Conversation About Race by first-time film maker Craig Bodeker. Wow! What a fantastic exploration of the anti-White double standards surrounding "racism" in modern America. Please purchase a personal copy, show it to family and friends and consider giving it as a gift. The movie costs $20, including shipping and handling. It looks like you can watch it free online as well.

I believe this documentary will help awaken some of the brainwashed Whites to the unfairness of our "civil society" and make them receptive to Whites openly pursuing their interests as much all other groups.

This is exactly the sort highly intelligent, fair-minded and thoughtful film maker we need to articulate the White side of story that is never shown by the mainstream media or Hollywood (except to condemn White advocates). I have great hopes for Mr. Bodeker's future works, some of which will hopefully explore issues from a pro-White perspective, including various topics never discussed honestly by the MSM and Hollywood.

Hopefully many other White advocates will follow Mr. Bodeker's lead and create additional works spanning the full range of news and cultural products to counter the pervasive anti-White propaganda of our ruling elites.

Whites have tremendous talents and resources which are mostly being misdirected against our long-term interests. By breaking out of the "anti-White matrix" and creating more "red pills", there will be a positive feedback effect recruiting more and more Whites to awaken, some of whom will become activists and contributers.

Just two years ago I myself was a fairly conventional, colorblind, neoconned, pro-Jewish conservative.

Not anymore, thanks to the red pills on the internet.

Thank you Mr. Bodeker for manufacturing a giant batch of red pills!

Hopefully the rest of us can help spread them around and produce more in our own modest ways.

Updated 2009-07-29: fixed a grammar error and added a bit more

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Prophets of Doom and the Need for Organization

Have you ever watched prophets of doom like Peter Schiff, Gerald Celente or Alex Jones? My perception is that Peter Schiff is the least extreme while Alex Jones is a full-blown conspiracy theorist (not that there's anything wrong with that if he mostly turns out to be right!). Gerald Celente is intermediate being around half or two-thirds of a full-blown conspiracy theorist.

I can't help noticing that each of the three appear to gain fame and make their livelihoods through their pessimistic rhetoric. Peter Schiff's company, Euro-Pacific Capital, sells services based on his theories, he publishes best-selling books and he apparently consults for the rich and powerful (e.g in the UAE). Gerald Celente sells a newsletter and makes many paid appearances while Alex Jones hosts a radio show and produces a lot of DVDs. Both Peter Schiff and Gerald Celente have appeared in many MSM shows in spite of their somewhat anti-Establishment messages. Despite these potential conflicts of interests, many of their claims seem plausible and deserve a fair hearing, especially given their recent predictions of our economic troubles with lucid explanations when the other pundits belittled them while predicting smooth sailing as far as the eye could see.

The doomsters share some commonalities in their predictions, particularly in believing a major depression is coming. Peter Schiff seems to believe it's more a matter of incompetence, while Gerald Celente believes they are inflating a final bubble, the "bailout bubble" to succeed the previously popped and housing bubbles, which will ultimately burst with no further bailouts possible, and that powerful interests will use these turbulent times to bring in more authoritarian control, likely launching a war to distract from total economic collapse. Alex Jones seems to have an intricate conspiracy theory about this being a long-standing plan to create a totalitarian world government with most people becoming highly controlled slaves and around 80% of the population being killed using bioweapons. In spite of the seeming outlandishness of some of Alex Jones' beliefs, some of what he says seems quite reasonable, particularly giving the creeping totalitarianism and police state structures. I get the sense that during some of Alex's most agitated rants he is being a bit of a showman, kind of like Glenn Beck periodically comes across as phony, except that Glenn Beck seems a lot more phony than Alex Jones. I've heard maybe around 15 hours of Alex Jones and perhaps 10 hours of Glenn Beck, so I'm no great expert on these guys.

I haven't carefully researched much of what these guys say (e.g the alleged misdeeds of the Federal Reserve), but much of their message seems plausible. In particular I strongly suspect that the US economy has been managed badly, e.g. by encouraging speculation over long-term investment, allowing looting by the executive class, losing advanced manufacturing and not properly protecting our markets in balance with how our trading "partners" protect their markets, and that the phony economy will soon come crashing down. Some excellent writers discussing this are Pat Buchanan and the Irish economics writer, Eamonn Fingleton. I strongly recommend Mr. Fingleton's book In the Jaws of the Dragon which discusses how the East Asian Economic and Political System is not compatible with Western style capitalism, at least how it's practiced in the US currently.

Whether there is a New World Order (NWO) conspiracy to impose totalitarian control on the US and ultimately the entire world is such a disturbing question that deserves a full and fair investigation even if it is likely false.

Unfortunately there are many issues needing a similar thorough analysis by fair and objective observers, while most of us can only devote a little time on the side to explore these issues. One goal is for us to eventually create think tanks with full-time scholars and support staff to investigate issues and think creatively about the problems facing us. This is something for White advocates to aim for in the future although we have the beginnings of this. Another approach that can be started sooner and with minimal resources is harnessing the power of thousands of part-time activists over the internet by intelligently combining their efforts to enable these sorts of detailed investigations. Many of these investigations can be done with other groups because many of the topics aren't directly related to White advocacy.

An example of how important work can be done by non-scholarly activists working part time would be an audit of references in academic works. One controversial example is Kevin MacDonald's books which probably have over 500 references per book. Imagine if a team of volunteers tracked down each and every source that Dr. MacDonald cited and did a fair-use scan of the full context of each citation. These could then be posted on a web site that had special software designed to support this sort of research and criticism. This software could be open-source and could integrate with existing software, like open-source portals or content management systems. Then users could judge whether Dr. MacDonald's books accurately quote and interpret each source. Statistics could be compiled about his accuracy. The critical point is that because everything is open, each assertion can be audited and each viewer can examine the full evidence to see who is reliable or not. For example, if it turned out that Dr. MacDonald was deceptive with 20+% of his references that would reflect badly upon his honesty, while if there were just minor nitpicks and no major duplicitous distortions, then his scholarly honesty would pass the first hurdle.

Note that this sort of detailed checking of hundreds of different references is a massive effort for one person, but would be easily doable by a few hundred people donating a few hours per person or by dozens of people giving 20-30 hours per person.

With his treatment of sources analyzed, scrutiny could be given to the rest of his text and the validity of his other facts and logic. Links to other sources could be developed in determining the truth. The ultimate result would be a detailed exploration of the truth or falsehood of the book and the underlying issues it discusses. Eventually the same sort of analysis can be applied to other sources with related things linked together for easy navigation to further human knowledge and understanding.

Many other authors, journalists, politicians, academics and organizations have works, predictions and promises deserving a careful accounting. Consider all the free trade propaganda that has turned out to be absolutely false. We don't currently have a systematic way to rate pundits and talking heads who've been wrong, very wrong and extremely wrong, yet are still invited back to deceive the public with special-interest propaganda. We desperately need this sort of accountability system to keep our "civil society" honest. Imagine how useful it would be for TV viewers to automatically see a side window pop up when a pundit was talking that had a summary of their historical accuracy, their affiliations, etc. If the viewer desired, then could drill down into the details with arbitrary depth. Ultimately this should encourage greater accuracy and less overt propaganda in the MSM. Here I'm assuming that the next generation or two of TVs will essentially be computer/TV hybrids that are hooked up to the internet, or that cheap devices with this capability will plug into the TVs.

By intelligently organizing our efforts we can create virtual think tanks that let us each make a small contribution that synergizes with hundreds or thousands of others to produce a much more powerful result than floundering around in isolation with our efforts having near zero impact. Our scholars could get virtual support staffs to aid their research efforts while channeling the energy of activists that would likely otherwise be wasted. This sort of organization can be applied to many kinds of activities beyond fact and logic checking.

This system could be applied to study a variety of other problems and issues. For example various facts, values and arguments could be explored. Evidence could be supplied or pointed to. The goal is a robust exploration of topics that tries to coherently and comprehensively explore issues from all perspectives. Dissenting viewpoints can be integrated into the exploration, in fact, ideally, the system would allow many different factions to concurrently articulate their strongest arguments and counterarguments all using the same system, i.e. everybody from the far left to the far right with all viewpoints in between, including off-the-wall ones. Hopefully by letting each side present its arguments and marshall its facts using the same system, areas of agreement or dissent can be clarified and rational dialog can be encouraged. The resulting explorations would also be excellent learning resources for readers wanting to explore different sides of complicated issues.

There would need to be features to fight those that try to subvert the purpose of open dialog, e.g. by creating lots of clutter and disinformation. I believe this can be done while not suppressing free speech. One approach would be that such trolls would eventually be rated by other people that you trust as trolls, so their contributions could be hidden by default. This could be overridden on a case-by-case basis when trusted voters believe the particular contribution adds value. Even though the trolls' contributions would normally be hidden, they would still be accessible so people could check whether or not they are actual trolls or if their viewpoint is being suppressed. Different factions may have different views of who adds value and one feature would let users explore the structure from different perspectives, e.g. what does the exploration look like from the perspective of a revolutionary far-leftist versus a neoconservative versus a White advocate, among dozens or even hundreds of different views.

We should fully reject the popular tactic of demonizing speakers, usually using ad hominem attacks, to avoid confronting their arguments. The neocons are notorious for this extreme intellectual dishonesty. Everyone's arguments should be considered in good faith and any flaws pointed out using facts and logic or by highlighting differences in values. In many ways obsession over the left-right divide or partisan party differences is con game designed to intellectually disarm us by limiting our thinking and to have us cheer for "our team", not noticing that both teams are tools of the elites. Instead of mindlessly rejecting anything leftists say, we should thoughtfully consider their points. In some cases they might be correct and we should adapt our viewpoint. We should be reading Chomsky, Nader and others, even though we may disagree with some of their values and beliefs.

By creating this enhanced "public institutional memory", those who use dishonest rhetoric will eventually damage their own reputations, while those operating honestly and in good faith will gain trust.

I believe we need much more free speech and open investigation while our "civil society" and elites are pushing for the opposite. Just look at the recent flood of articles and op-eds calling for stringent "hate speech" laws to weaken what's left of our Constitutional rights and the coordinated Jewish effort to get Pat Buchanan fired from his television job. I suspect one major cause of conspiracy theory and paranoia is the suppression of free and unhindered discussion. Ultimately our elites are undermining our "civil society" but perhaps this is intentional.

It's become clear that our "civil society", including academia, think tanks and the MSM, is not trustworthy in many ways and our government has likely succumbed to corruption through lobbying, cultural Marxist infiltration and other influences. Therefore we need to create alterative watchdogs to provide an independent audit of our existing institutions. Some of these alternatives may already exist or do part of the job, but there is a need for much more, particularly those that follow the approach I described above using sophisticated tools to create open research and criticism with full auditing of the facts, logic and values.

When we encounter lies or slander we can harness a community to produce detailed rebuttals with full proof if they don't already exist. Once detailed analyses of different questions exist, they can be referenced while making arguments, and if new information and perspectives arise, they can be integrated into the exploration.

I'm curious what other folks think of the doomsters and their messages as well as the rest of the post. I'd be interested in your comments or email.


Apologies for the delay in coming out with my alternative culture post, which is my next big article. Hopefully it will be ready within one or at most two weeks. I do have a list of those future posts I've mentioned in previous articles and hope to write one or two per month.

Friday, May 29, 2009

Anti-White Bias: Ignoring Voter Intimidation

Updated 2009-05-31 (below original post).

Here's a typical example of the anti-White bias of our "civil society" as well as the increasingly brazen corruption of the Obama administration.

From the Washington Times: (emphasis mine)

Justice Department political appointees overruled career lawyers and ended a civil complaint accusing three members of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense of wielding a nightstick and intimidating voters at a Philadelphia polling place last Election Day, according to documents and interviews.

The incident - which gained national attention when it was captured on videotape and distributed on YouTube - had prompted the government to sue the men, saying they violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act by scaring would-be voters with the weapon, racial slurs and military-style uniforms.

Career lawyers pursued the case for months, including obtaining an affidavit from a prominent 1960s civil rights activist who witnessed the confrontation and described it as "the most blatant form of voter intimidation" that he had seen, even during the voting rights crisis in Mississippi a half-century ago.

The lawyers also had ascertained that one of the three men had gained access to the polling place by securing a credential as a Democratic poll watcher, according to interviews and documents reviewed by The Washington Times.

The career Justice lawyers were on the verge of securing sanctions against the men earlier this month when their superiors ordered them to reverse course, according to interviews and documents. The court had already entered a default judgment against the men on April 20.


To support its evidence, the government had secured an affidavit from Bartle Bull, a longtime civil rights activist and former aide to Sen. Robert F. Kennedy's 1968 presidential campaign. Mr. Bull said in a sworn statement dated April 7 that he was serving in November as a credentialed poll watcher in Philadelphia when he saw the three uniformed Panthers confront and intimidate voters with a nightstick.

Inexplicably, the government did not enter the affidavit in the court case, according to the files.

"In my opinion, the men created an intimidating presence at the entrance to a poll," he declared. "In all my experience in politics, in civil rights litigation and in my efforts in the 1960s to secure the right to vote in Mississippi ... I have never encountered or heard of another instance in the United States where armed and uniformed men blocked the entrance to a polling location."

Mr. Bull said the "clear purpose" of what the Panthers were doing was to "intimidate voters with whom they did not agree." He also said he overheard one of the men tell a white poll watcher: "You are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker."

He called their conduct an "outrageous affront to American democracy and the rights of voters to participate in an election without fear." He said it was a "racially motivated effort to limit both poll watchers aiding voters, as well as voters with whom the men did not agree."

The Washington Times has a good editorial discussing this case:
Protecting Black Panthers: The Obama administration ignores voter intimidation

The simple identity interchange test of double standards clearly proves this is yet another example of anti-White bias so beloved by our "civil society". If White men had been outside a polling station dressed like the defendents, intimidating Black voters and using language like "You are about to be ruled by the white man, nigger", then our "civil society", including the media, academia and the government, especially the Department of Justice, would've gone ballistic and almost certainly those White men would've been prosecuted to a felony conviction, including hate crimes, and would've served jail time. If the prosecution had failed, they would've found some "civil rights" law trick to overturn the explicit Fifth Amendment right of protection against double jeopardy, until they got their White men.

But naturally, if Blacks are the aggressors and Whites the victims, then the rules change. If Sonia Sotomayor is appointed to the Supreme Court, no doubt she'll happily enshrine just these sort of double standards as precedents in "CON-stitutional Law".

Yeah, we get it. F*** Whitey and f*** the color-blind society!

In looking through Google News, the only mainstream media hits are for the Washington Times, which broke the story, and Fox News, the neoconservative-dominated network. The rest of the hits are for some conservative web sites. The MSM has no problem quickly covering emerging stories that adhere to their preferred, politically correct narrative, but obviously they're reluctant to give this story oxygen, especially when the Obama administration is already busy engaging in obvious corruption, like screwing over the Chrysler bondholders by ignoring established bankruptcy law, only closing Chrylser dealers that were Republican donors, pressuring California to bow to SEIU demands or lose federal stimulus money, the bailouts and their unaccountability, porkulus money for favored clients like ACORN, the education ripoff complex, etc, etc, etc.

It will be interesting to see if the MSM gets around to covering this story over the next few days or if they try to squelch it like most other politically incorrect stories.

A unidentified lady at the Constitutional Convention in 1787:
“Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?”

Benjamin Franklin:
“A Republic, if you can keep it.”

We lost it.

Zimbabwe and South Africa, here we come!

Yes We Can!

UPDATE: 2009-05-31

Two days after my original post only ONE additional MSM article has appeared in Google News: this CNN story:

Let's see how the "professionals" at CNN cover the story:

May 28, 2009
Justice Department drops charges in voter intimidation case
Posted: 07:00 PM ET

From CNN Senior Producer Kevin Bohn

WASHINGTON (CNN) – The Justice Department is dropping charges against the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense and two of its members who were allegedly involved in voter intimidation on Election Day at a Philadelphia, Pennsylvania polling station.

A Justice spokesman said the department decided to take this action after winning an injunction earlier this month against a third member, Samir Shabazz, that prevents him from ever brandishing a weapon outside a polling place again as he was charged with doing last November.

Shabazz was one of the three persons, along with the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense, charged with voter intimidation last January in a lawsuit filed under the Voting Rights Act. Shabazz will not face any jail time or a fine.

“Claims were dismissed against the other defendants based on a careful assessment of the facts and the law,” DOJ spokesman Alejandro Miyar said in a statement. “The Department is committed to the vigorous prosecution of those who intimidate, threaten or coerce anyone exercising his or her sacred right to vote.”

On Election Day, two men in uniforms stood outside the polling station with one of them holding a police-style baton weapon and saying he was providing security there. Justice has alleged that person was Shabazz.

In January, Justice said in a criminal complaint that the chairman of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense confirmed its members were stationed at that location as part of a nationwide effort to deploy people at polling stations.

The Justice Department says The New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense is distinct from the well-known Black Panther Party of the 1960's.

UPDATE: Malik Shabaaz, chairman of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense, told CNN Friday that Samir Shabaaz is no longer a member of the organization, and that his organization does not support voter intimidation.

"We want to thank President Obama and his administration for dropping charges against us that were vindictively brought by the Bush administration," Malik Shabaaz told CNN. "We don't condone any type of illegal activity at polling stations."

Shabaaz said the members in Pennsylvania were not acting under the direction of the national party.

(Updated at 4:30 p.m. on Friday, May 29 with New Black Panther Party response)

Notice that this story completely ignored the affidavit given by Bartle Bull and it completely ignores the explicity anti-White racial facet of the incident. Even if CNN didn't know this aspect of the story when it was first published on the 28th, which is extremely doubtful, it certainly knew about it after the Washington Times published their detailed article on the 29th well before this story was updated at 4:30pm on the 29th, which was used to further undermine the real issue by quoting a New Black Panther Party leader acting as if the entire incident was some sort of illegitimate persecution of their poor, innocent selves.

Notice how this article frames the story as if Justice Department had won some great victory in "winning an injunction ... that prevents him from ever [sic, according to Washington Times story] brandishing a weapon outside a polling place again ...".

Then the DOJ spokesmen is given the floor so he can TELL us that "The Department is committed to the vigorous prosecution of those who intimidate, threaten or coerce anyone exercising his or her sacred right to vote.". Hahahahaha!!! More bulls*** constructed reality! That is exactly what they are NOT doing by treating this serious attack against our supposed civil society so lightly BECAUSE Black activists were culpable. The critical point: would they have behaved the same if the identities were interchanged between Black and White? Answer: No way!!!

This is just business as usual for our corrupt, worthless and elite-and-corporate-interest-controlled MSM.

Hopefully "change we can believe in" is coming soon.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

White Advocacy: Ideas for Alternative Media

One major force brainwashing most Whites against thinking and acting ethnocentrically is the mainstream media (MSM), which includes newspapers, magazines, TV, radio and their internet outposts. Like all of our "civil society" institutions, the MSM constantly treats the smallest assertion of White identity or ethnocentrism as racism or supremacism while hypocritically supporting much stronger racial identity and ethnocentrism among ALL non-White groups. This was an important factor in my realizing that the left is not really "celebrating" other groups so much as despising Whites.

So one important strategy for White advocates is to subvert, replace or neutralize the impact of these various anti-White institutions. Essentially we're in a deep hole and, barring some unforeseen catastrophic event, it will take many years, much effort and much better organization to dig ourselves out.

Regardless of the many possible futures of the US, Whites must fight against the pervasive anti-White double standards that currently dominate our "civil society". Hopefully our system will be open to reform, and it is even possible that a fair, color-blind society could be recovered where Whites' ethnic interests, identity, peoplehood and survival are treated with the same respect as other groups, but unfortunately, we're on a radically different course and have been for decades.

Some Causes of the Mainstream Media's Anti-White Bias

The MSM are dominated by corporate interests, White guilt, multiculturalism, political correctness and disproportionate Jewish influence, among others. Part of this anti-White environment is propagated because the left has gradually taken control of our "civil society" over the last fifty years, so they're able to strongly influence many facets of our culture and society, including co-opting many of our cognitive elites, which further strengthens the forces for the left.

The left has changed the rules by first claiming to create a color-blind society, but then heaping contempt on color-blindness in favor of excoriating Whites and their supposed "White Privilege" and explicitly rejecting the color-blind ideal. This, among other evidence, demonstrates their bad faith and animosity to Whites. Of course many on the left probably don't interpret the evidence this way, so part of our advocacy must be to grapple with the various leftist arguments and values in their strongest, most cogent forms, to be able to rebut them, so we can recapture some of our lost brethren and reduce the losses of our cognitive elites in the various cauldrons of leftist indoctrination. I plan to explore this issue in a future post. It's also important to understand the psychology and motivations that drive leftists and how this manifests in their activism and behavior.

While the left obsesses over equality of outcome between Whites and NAMs (non-Asian minorities), and insists upon coercive law to create an unnatural parity, I've never seen the slightest concern on their part to level disparities between Whites and Jews, which are about as large, or between Jews and NAMs, which are truly massive, or between Asians and NAMs, or all the various intra-group disparities. If the left is truly concerned with disparate outcomes, why do they focus upon one particular dispartity instead of considering the full set of disparities? Of course, if they confronted the existence of these many disparities, they would have to seriously question their belief that the primary cause of the Black-White disparity is anti-Black racism and discrimination by Whites.

Pressures on Existing Mainstream Media

Fortunately several forms of media are struggling financially, primarily from the emergence of the internet, which radically changes the possibilities and economics of information dissemination as well as increasingly draining the advertising that most media channels rely on to fund their operations. Stories seemingly appear daily lamenting the tribulations of the third estate. Yeehah!

The media frequently pushes diversity, multiculturalism, anti-White rhetoric, White guilt and politically correct lies, and it suppresses "hate facts", contrary stories or dissenting views of the diversity party line. They particularly favor hiding non-White crime against Whites, including some shockingly brutal atrocities, like the Knoxville Horror, the Witchita Massacre or the killing of the White Polish-American Marine Sgt. Janek "Jan" Pawel Pietrzak and his Black wife, Quiana Jenkins-Pietrzak, by four Black Marines, including two of Sgt. Pietrzak's underlings.

An analysis of Google or Google News stories discussing Sgt. Pietrzak demonstrate that many of the modest portion of the MSM that covered the story, obscured the fact that all four of the killers were Black. Look at how sparse the Google News coverage is over the last month even though new court testimony is currently ongoing. Google News only shows one non-local, English language newspaper covering the story, The New York Daily News, and they don't mention in this story that the four killers were Black, although they had been one of the few MSM outlets to do so previously.

Our MSM masters insult our intelligence by not even mentioning the possibility that maybe, just maybe, there is a racial angle to the killing. This ABC News link contains NO mention of the racial angle and the embedded video also refuses to articulate any possibility of a racial motive, preferring to blather on about the mysterious motive that will probably be forever unknown. It's only tribute to the possibility of a racial angle was their showing the mug shots of all four suspects which demonstrates they were all Black. What the ABC News video actually does is use coded language that might sail over the heads of some average or below-average people who might interpret their language literally, while conveying a subtext that implies a racial motive is present, particularly through their grandiose evasions and subtle clues in framing the story including the images shown and the background details about the couple, but by explicitly refusing to articulate this, they're demonstrating the power of political correctness to enforce a grossly dishonest interpretation of reality in spite of our "lying eyes". Ultimately it's an exercise in raw power to condition the viewers to recognize and submit to the officially approved limits of allowed speech and thoughts in our increasingly totalitarian society.

This is a classic illustration of Theodore Dalrymple's observation:
Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.

We're supposed to believe that the killers savagely killed Mr. and Mrs. Pietrzak, including rape and sexual abuse of his wife, for a simple robbery. Even worse a CNN transcript of a show from the day before most of the initial stories were published demonstrates that the full details of the story were common knowledge, and presumably all the MSM reporters basically knew the same facts, yet they deliberately chose to hide many of these important details. Note that a few newspapers did report the fact that the four killers were Black, but many deliberately left this out, along with other details indicating the gratuitious violence, rape and racist graffiti.

Also, the authorities are guilty in this little charade, since if it had been a Black sergeant and his White wife savagely killed and raped by four White underlings with racist graffiti at the crime scene, they definitely would've pushed for any applicable hate crimes, under massive pressure from a firestorm of international media coverage and howls of outrage by the Black "leadership" gang of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, the NAACP, among others, and, oh yeah, the press and the rest of our "civil society" would INSTANTLY call it a horrible hate crime. There would likely be many statements released by legions of academic activists denouncing the brutal White racism gripping America and hundreds of candlelight vigils would be held across the county with guilt-drenched SWPLs denouncing their Whiteness (really meaning all those non-enlightened troglodyte White masses). Yet for the Pietrzak family slaughter, the MSM don't dare mention the term hate crime (same for the prosecutors up to this point that I've seen). Hate crime? Nah, it's just a robbery gone wrong.

I personally think hate crime law is a travesty and should be completely scrapped in favor of only enforcing the law based on the criminal's actions without trying to puzzle out whether politically incorrect throughts were motivating the criminal, but given the existence of hate crimes, they should be applied objectively, uniformly and fairly. Obviously in this case and several other notable cases, horrific hate crimes have been committed against Whites with absolute silence from our worthless "civil society". The easy test for double standards is whether people think or act differently when identities are interchanged as I illustrated above.

The media is losing credibility because of their blatant political correctness and dishonesty in hiding and obscuring Black and immigrant crime, among other taboos. "Coincidentally", the big and little lies they push also benefit globalist, corporate interests and a small, wealthly elite, while marginalizing non-elite Whites and the middle and working classes in general. Blacks are and will be hurt more in the future by massive third world immigration, but their "leadership" doesn't care.

The government is also losing credibilty with their handling of this case. These sorts of double standards are exactly why I've given up on the color-blind society and realized it's a huge con game with Whites as total chumps (and I don't think I'm alone in making this conclusion).

Although this media bias hasn't gone unnoticed, and even though many average people might feel uneasy about the media, they don't have any viable alternatives, since even "conservative" media is really mostly neoconservative and in thrall to corporate interests, which also supports much of the politically correct, multicultural agenda, including massive legal immigration and amnesty.

The rise in cynicism and the loss of credibility coupled with the technological possibilities of the internet provide an opportunity for serious alternatives to arise.

Closely related is the development of alternative cultural production and the arts which I'll consider in a separate post.

First I'll lay out some reasons why a diverse alternative media that begins reaching a wider audience seems inevitable, and after considering the specific alternative channels, I'll consider other facets of alternative mass media. America has had a variety of alternative media channels for many decades. In the realm of newspapers and magazines, a wide variety of relatively low circulation offerings have probably been available stretching back to the founding of our republic and certainly many niche publications covering the full political spectrum from far-right to far-left have been available throughout the 20th century.

The internet has enabled a wider audience to see alternative perspectives with very little effort or cost to the consumer, while many of the traditional media costs, like printing and mailing have been eliminated for internet publications. Not surprisingly, many new internet-only publications have sprung up reaching much larger audiences than were previously possible.

Basically I believe it will soon be possible for a variety of alternative viewpoints to begin reaching a much wider audience than previously possible because technological changes will let mass consumers easily bypass the current corporate-controlled distribution channels, like TV cable networks or limited radio channels, using internet-based devices. It will be interesting to see how the established media react to the onslaught of competition from so many diverse sources, including various ethnic advocates, the full spectrum of political beliefs from far left to far right, quirky subcultures and bands of amateur individuals, among others.

Let's now consider some specific media.

Alternative Magazines

Alternative magazines are probably the most successful form of alternative media with the widest current readership. They've blossomed in the internet era as the quintessential example of how internet technologies make it much cheaper to produce and distribute content, enabling an end run around corporate control mechanisms, like limited exposure through bookstores, magazine stands, etc. By using various open-source products and tools, including sophisticated content management systems, attractive, powerful and professional sites can be developed very inexpensively. As new web technologies are developed, web savvy activists can stay right at cutting edge.

Magazines are typically distinguished from newspapers in being delivered on a weekly or monthly basis instead of daily and including more analysis and background rather than raw news coverage. But this distinction seems be eroding somewhat as most online magazines have daily online content that supplements their traditional periodical content.

A few good examples are VDARE, Taki's Magazine and I trust VDARE on immigration and other topics far more than any MSM source. Taki's Magazine is an internet-only magazine offering a traditional or paleoconservative perspective that has been pushed out of the entire MSM by liberals and neoconservatives with very few exceptions like Pat Buchanan, who probably has to mask his real views at least a little to avoid losing his media role. Many of us who imbibed the neoconservative party line from National Review, the Weekly Standard, Fox News or Rush Limbaugh, now realize there is a much wider universe thanks to the alternative media available mostly through the internet. Likewise gives a critique of American imperial and war policies rarely seen in the MSM.

There are hundreds and even thousands of additional sites covering the full spectrum politically and focusing on different target audiences and subject areas. A goal of White advocates is to support existing White-friendly sites while creating and supporting more. When I say White-friendly, I mean it probably doesn't push White advocacy hard, but rather completely rejects the typical anti-White assumptions of the MSM and includes positive views of Whites, probably mostly implicitly, is open to questioning all the current sacred cows and provides a more respectful view of White advocates, among a wide range of voices. Separate media outlets might take up White advocacy more directly. The goal is to encourage an open, honest dialogue and fair treatment.

Part of the propaganda war against Whites is accomplished through subtle (and not-so-subtle) injections of anti-White digs into stories concerned with other matters. We can use the same techniques in the media we control and influence. This should be particularly effective in other domains, like cultural production. So, for example, other topics, like family, parenting, cooking, lifestyle, travel, cultural, educational and many other subjects can be developed that support subtle, non-overbearing White-friendly rhetoric. The goal is to displace a noticeable portion of the audience currently given to corporate media that nearly universally pushes political correctness, multiculturalism and anti-White subtexts. Some of these new media can even be financially self-supporting or lucrative through revenue streams currently going to anti-White corporations. Others may run mostly on volunteer labor with charitable donations or White-friendly foundations supporting the core costs. One approach might be to create more regional and community content to build local participation and identity instead of our current phony top-down, leveled, national culture driven by the manipulative values of our elites and corporations desiring good, little consumers buying lots of crap they mostly don't need.

An excellent project would be to create a White-friendly current events magazine that competes with Time, Newsweek and US News and World Report while keeping the costs much more contained through mostly web operation and skillful use of volunteer labor and organization. Hopefully it could eventually be reasonably self-supporting and synergize with a network of White-friendly companies, organizations and other media allies. Many of the skills used to create professional alternative media have market value, so volunteer labor can also gain valuable experience, skill enhancement and networking to further the volunteer's career while fulfilling activist passions.

Another approach is to aggregate content from several existing alternative magazines to create a higher-reach virtual magazine. This can also act as advertising for the original publications by making more readers aware of the different specific sites. A related concept is to create a Reader's-Digest-like magazine that simplifies and highlights the most important points both for time-limited readers and average readers with non-elite literacy skills. Imagine providing Steve Sailor summaries accessible to the everyday folks along with their ability to navigate to additional detail if they need convince their peers of the substance of the points. An important goal is to enable both our elites and average citizens learn to rebut the left's arguments and rhetoric through facts, logic and our own rhetorical techniques for offense and defense. This is an important part to trying to salvage our "civil society" by opposing and ultimately reversing its current anti-White bias.

I believe that print-on-demand technology, e.g. at an airport booth, will make it feasible to create inexpensive hardcopy magazines for those wanting to read physical media while cutting out pretty much all of the traditional costs and complexities of physical distribution. But many consumers won't bother with reading physical media when they can directly read the content over the web, including the proliferation of flexible new devices. Imagine an Amazon Kindle-like device with another two or three generations of development where you have high-quality color screens that look like paper where you're wired into the internet to follow links, look up unknown words, automatically delve into greater detail for topics discussed in articles, etc. And new magazine content can be automatically retrieved if the user chooses.

Even better, some of these devices will likely enable a full range of media viewing, including magazines, newspapers, audio, radio and TV, as well as sophisticated information management tools. A major goal is for White advocates to be on the cutting edge in developing and exploiting these many changes both to benefit economically as well as spreading our message.

Alternative Newspapers

As mentioned earlier newspapers are under particular market pressure for many reasons including the loss of subscribers as many consumers shift to internet for their daily news, while their primary sources of advertising revenue, including classified ads, are transferred to other channels, like the internet and direct mail. And, as previously discussed, a fair number of people are aware that newspapers are not providing the full story for many important issues, are beset by political correctness and multicultural ideology, and that most are owned by a handful of corporations closely interconnected to our ruling elites, but there aren't too many alternatives.

Most newspapers rely on a few news services, like the Associated Press or Reuters, to provide much of their national and international coverage and pretty much all of these services are aligned with the globalist, multicultural elites. Many of the European news services are closely tied to the state elites, commonly receiving government financing and various monopolistic advantages, and it clearly shows in their coverage.

Even much of the traditional alternative press, which is normally somewhat liberal or leftist, is being bought by corporations to target their predominantly SWPL readers. Some local, alternative conservative newspapers also exist, for example, publishing weekly.

A critical way to gain credibility is to exploit the dishonesty of the current media by bolding covering the stories suppressed by the MSM, particularly politically incorrect crime. The public craves accurate and honest information but the current elites don't want to provide it because it directly conflicts with their goal of radically transforming our country demographically and politically, meaning their plans are directly against the interests of most of the native population, but they don't want the chumps to understand this. Imagine sites that keep reliable and detailed statistics and stories regarding politically incorrect local crimes and other attempted official malfeasance, like when police in some large cities try to keep crime statistics down by discouraging victims from filing crime reports. If the general public knew there were reporters and activists committed to fighting this official corruption, it would be much harder for the elites to continue their current con game, because sympathetic sources, including those within our institutions, would know they'd have trustworthy reporters to inform.

Unless the elites try to create a totalitarian state, they will be unable to stop the free flow of information. If they do try to create the totalitarian state, they will likely find they've gone to far and have caused a major rebellion against their usurpations, at least if they try within the next decade or two.

It is vital that we create some White-friendly newspapers, including many local ones and at least a few national and international ones. A service can be created by pooling together the resources of many local actors with some national and international resources supported by the many local papers and other organizations, foundations and donors who value these alternatives. Many of the national and international resources can actually be part of an international network of people cooperating to provide wide coverage while mostly using local resources in each case. For example, hundreds and even thousands of European volunteers and advocates could provide substantial coverage throughout Europe for worldwide audiences, just like thousands of American workers can provide American coverage for European audiences as well as Americans. Some of this already exists on the internet, but it hasn't been organized to synergize into effective national and international networks.

Many of the local newspapers can start by supplementing existing local newspapers. So instead of attempting comprehensive local coverage, they can start by focusing on those stories normally supressed by corporate media. They can also act as critics of the local papers by demonstrating the various devious and dishonest ways that stories and events are censored and slanted by corporate media. They can also provide truly free speech related to local issues, unlike many existing newspapers which censor many politically incorrect comments. I believe a better approach than censorship is to provide various tools that allow people to filter out intellectual sabateurs without actually suppressing free speech. For example, in an open forum, some people might try to disrupt honest argumentation by creating many nuisance posts. Eventually such commenters will lose their credibility with most readers who will ignore anything they say. I believe tools could be built that would allow full freedom of speech while empowering users and groups of users to overcome those who essentially argue in bad faith and detract from useful discussions. Other tools could also help in supporting or rebutting arguments by pointing to more detailed arguments and evidence. The goal is to encourage honest, open-minded and thoughtful consideration of many different perspectives to try to come up with the truth and the best policies. I plan to discuss this more in a separate post.

Much of this work can be done purely using the internet and various low-cost or free content management tools. Guides can be created to help intelligent average citizens act as effective fact checkers, researchers, reporters, writers and editors. I also suspect that many older, retired citizens who are deeply concerned about the direction and future of our country will volunteer, and since they are retired, they are less able to be intimidated for fear of their future career. So ultimately much less money would be needed because we could harness more activist and volunteer labor and we would not be so concerned about making money. The more success this media achieves, the more volunteers, donors and supporters it will attract. Parts of the media could also pursue various media-related revenue streams which would both empower themselves while denying those resources to the anti-White corporate media.

One way local volunteers and workers, in many cases relative amateurs, can act as effective reporters is to get out and do much of the tedious legwork that is a vital part of genuine reporting. That involves attending various official or community meetings, talking with many different people within the community, pooling and analyzing local information, much like an intelligence gathering operation, analyzing various official and legal records, building relationships with various power brokers, bureaucrats, elites and average workers within many different organizations, and assertively using laws like the Freedom of Information Act to compel the authorities to provide information in the public interest. Evasive or deceptive behavior by authorities can be exposed to create public pressure for keeping them honest. As these movements gain more credibility, it will be much easier for sympathetic or self-interested members of institutions like government, corporations, organizations, etc, to act as sources, including anonymous whistle blowers. Obviously great care must be taken when working with anonymous sources who sometimes have selfish interests for selectively leaking some information or disinformation. Alternative newspapers and news services can have a public web page with different ways to contact reporters to provide information, providing tips on internet anonymity, uploading documents securely over the web, phone calls, personal meetings and even clock-and-dagger techniques for the extremely cautious, like Deep Throat used during Watergate. Also, as they gain prominance, officials will be forced to give these reporters the same rights they given to other professional reporters.

By focusing on honesty, accuracy, objectivity, fairness and long-term credibility, trust can be built up among Whites and non-Whites alike. The core of White advocacy to me is that Whites are merely arguing for simple fairness so that they are treated no worse or better than any other group and that we can pursue our interests just as much as other groups are allowed and encouraged to. White Advocacy to me is about being pro-White rather than anti-Black or anti-Jewish. Sure, some parts of other communities sometimes do things we consider anti-White and we'll criticize them for that, just as it would be reasonable for members of other communities to criticize Whites if they believe Whites have behaved unfairly, like various historical injustices Whites have committed against Blacks, Native Americans or Jews that needed to be rectified and atoned for. Ultimately, we need to look to the future and try to build a positive, healthy and fair society, and I think free speech, inquiry and debate are critical tools to achieving that.

A major goal for much of this new alternative media is to be White-friendly so that our perspectives, beliefs and arguments are treated with the respect, objectivity and fairness they rarely receive in any MSM. Critical scrutiny would also be applied to current sacred cows whose misdeeds are currently shielded by the MSM. The overriding goal is to overturn the current political correctness and de facto censorship that help to deeply corrupt our "civil society" and to reach out to our currently brainwashed average citizens and cognitive elites. Although there would likely be many different niches within the White advocacy ecosystem, I think this relatively moderate one is the most important because it can help the most in deprogramming large numbers of our people and breaking the political correctness stifling much of public conversation.

Print-on-demand stations that rapidly print magazines or newspapers in airports or news kiosks, can be exploited. For example, if a customer knows they're going to go by a certain kiosk, they can order their desired product and prepay for it using standard online payment systems so they'll be assured of not having any significant wait. There might even be a fully automated disbursement system where they enter a purchase code and it automatically dispenses their order with no human intervention. They can choose which stories to include in the printout based on their interests. So each person may get the parts that most interest them. Perhaps it typically takes 20 or 30 seconds to print out a typical custom newspaper (it probably won't have the huge volume of ads that current ones do) and by preordering they can avoid any delays from competing customers. Although the printers would probably be designed so that customers rarely have to wait longer than three minutes under most circumstances even if they walk up. Of course within a few years you'll be able to have your mobile device detect your location and automatically show you local kiosks and their availability and let you quickly make your desired order. This shows how current magazine and newspaper distribution could be radically changed for those demanding paper copies.

But probably most people would dump paper altogether and just read the content over the web or on new-and-improved devices, as discussed above for magazines.

Alternative TV

TV is the critical media for reaching our average citizens. Many average and below-average people don't read all that much but watch plenty of TV. This is a crucial media that must be challenged both for news and for culture production, which I plan to discuss separately. TV can also be valuable for our cognitive elites, with high-quality, thoughtful and articulate programs being an important niche we must cover, i.e. a PBS alternative.

Imagine brutally honest documentaries done with professional graphics and reporters intelligible to average TV viewers directly confronting topics like Non-Asian Minority crime or immigration and how various elites benefit from deceiving the general public about these problems. I think within a year or two such shows would capture significant market attention, even if it was secret guilty pleasure of borderline SWPLs. Imagine frequent, vivid illustrations of how our country is being colonized and transformed into an alien land, which normally Hollywood and the MSM love to hide while propagandizing us with warm little lies. Imagine an investigative news magazine that targets Hollywood, the MSM, corporations, the refugee industry, and the full universe of our politically correct, multicultural and leftist enforcers. Imagine talk shows with experts like Peter Brimelow, Steve Sailor and Jared Taylor instead of the usual liberals and neocons. Of course I'm all in favor of useful debates between a wide range of people including leftists, liberals, various non-White advocates, neocons, moderates and others. The problem is that paleoconservatives, race realists and other perspectives have been almost entirely excluded from MSM exposure and the exposure they typically get has negative framing.

Pretty much all the news programs produced today like morning, noon, nightly and late night news as well as actual breaking news and special events could be covered. Also the full range of support and analysis, like talk shows, interviews, documentaries, debates, group discussions and many others. We should be open to emerging and innovative formats, especially those exploiting new technological possibilities that encourage wider community participation. Various technologies like voice masking could be used to encourage participation in controversial subjects while political correctness still reigns.

The critical innovation will be a new generation of devices that will allow TV sets to connect to the internet and download content, essentially bypassing our current satellite, cable and broadcast channels. These have revolutionary potential to break the corporate control currently applied to all of these capital-intensive or physically constrained distribution channels. So new virtual networks and stations can be created that anyone can "tune into" over the internet. If people like what they see, they will explore other offerings on these channels and related media, and they will recommend these channels to their friends and family.

The new devices can be based on open standards and even open-source software with new features being added periodically. They would have disk storage and act like a DVR where they can hold store shows, perhaps even hundreds or thousands of shows before they run out of space. They might very easily allow extra storage like external hard disks to be added that can boost the available storage. They might even allow customers to use and support peer-to-peer networking so the users can donate some of their internet bandwidth, particularly when they're not using it, and some small portion of their storage to hosting general content, so that there no central server is needed to host the content. Instead the general public can mostly use each others' storage devices to retrieve the shows, which makes media distribution time and cost much lower for content creators. Peer-to-peer technologies can also have very high-performance. Based on upcoming internet improvements, many people will probably be able to watch high-definition TV shows, including news, with at most a short delay to cache a little data to improve the quality of the performance. But people could also automatically download the shows they know they want to see so they can watch without having to worry about network problems disrupting the show.

Even slow network connections would be able to download shows of interest with high quality, it would just take more time, so they would wait to watch the show until after it is fully or nearly downloaded. Like DVRs the devices would be able to both download new content while playing currently stored content. The software could make it easy to create disks to store the shows to share with others who may not have internet access or for archiving. These devices could have reasonably intuitive on-screen menus and help to make them easy for average users. Since they're hooked to the internet, they could download audiovisual help that explains the devices, or allow users to browse help forums on their TV looking for help with their problems or to post a question. The device could probably enable full blown web surfing and other information services and tools as well as TV, especially now that most TVs will be high-definition. Some new internet-TV synergies may be possible, allowing the TV content to be playing in part of the screen while enabling other tools to work next to that. For example, the user may make text or audio notes that comment on the TV show, perhaps to investigate or clarify some point. Friends or virtual communities could interact while watching a show together or a user could create comments and questions for other members of a virtual community synchronized with different parts of a show. One use of the capability would be for activists to critique and analyze existing shows to help create guides debunking MSM propaganda and manipulation.

The tools to create news programs and documentaries, like cameras and editing equipment are much cheaper than historically, so low-cost equipment can be used to create professional-looking shows. Ideas, techniques and software can be shared and developed by this network of local channels, further lowering costs and improving effectiveness.

So given the possibilities of this new technical infrastructure, we want to create a White-friendly alternative media just like for the magazine and newspaper segments. In fact many of the same people can contribute across these different media, for example, doing research and journalistic leg work, and the different organizations can closely collaborate and cross-promote one another. Again, local people can start by covering the set of local stories that are currently suppressed and heavily slanted to build up market credibility. These various local virtual channels can pool their efforts with other local channels to create virtual national channels, perhaps with a small dedicated national or international staff.

As far as advertising, among other possibilities, we can promote local manufacturers, businesses, organizations and individuals that are committed to strengthening local communities and American workers instead of offshoring, outsourcing and insourcing foreign workers like so many amoral, traitorous corporations. Ideally we'd create some alternate retail channels that supply American products made by real Americans. I'll explore those ideas in a separate post. Funding could include donations from appreciative audiences. Using the internet many small donations would go far in helping these enterprises stay solvent. For example, viewers could become sponsors of a yearly series by paying $10, or if they particularly like a show, they can give a $5 donation. They could buy moderately priced disk sets for their personal use or to give as gifts.

One interesting application would be to capture an MSM news show, like the nightly news and then wrap critical content around it so that average people can see where the corporate media is trying to manipulate and deceive them. This can be linked to proof, like detailed documents and stories that elaborate on this for those that want to verify the accuracy of the critiques. This approach can be applied to any TV production, including cultural production, documentaries, public debate, government meetings, etc.

These media can tie into partners in other media, like web sites, magazines, newspapers, radio, organizations, etc. One goal within White advocacy is to create broad networks that collaborate and synergize.

If a network became large and professional enough, it might eventually be hosted by traditional cable or satellite systems. The network could also be something of a grab bag that has a wide-range of shows, particularly early on when less content is being produced.

Alternative Radio

New communication technologies will make inexpensive audio feeds through the internet or personal mobile devices possible so that traditional radio can be supplemented or displaced, just like TV. The main goal is to make it extremely easy and convenient for average people. The same points made for other media pretty much apply to radio as well.

General Strategy of Alternative Media

It is likely that as alternative media becomes more successful, the MSM will feel pressured to be more honest in their coverage of issues, since they'll have been embarrassed by the detailed exposure and critiques they will suffer. This would be good since it would demonstrate success in improving our "civil society" to be more honest and less anti-White.

Since our highest goals are not making money and serving our corporate masters, we can be free to pursue any innovations that emerge, even if they don't bring in revenue. It is likely that many new possiblities will arise in the future, some of which will likely have revenue potential.

A wide range of content targeted to different audiences should eventually be produced. For example we need to target average, above average and exceptional people. Other demographic segments should also be targeted like different age groups, both sexes, different subcultures, including blue collar workers, small businessmen, professionals, government, law enforcement and military, non-White groups, and even artsy, SWPL-types and committed leftists. Different segments may be reachable to some degree by packaging the message differently. In fact constructive relations with non-Whites can be enhanced when they hear an open and honest hearing of White advocacy which I see as pro-White but not anti-non-White, other than our desire to stop further non-White colonization of our country which will upset the ethnic balance of the nation and likely ultimately lead to serious societal problems if not checked. If Whites behave badly, they should be chided and likewise if non-Whites behave badly, they should also be held accountable. A major problem with our current "civil society" is its intentional rejection of a simple, fair standard like this in favor of anti-White ideology.

Although my personal preference is for scrupulously honest reporting and analysis, logically we'd want to have the full spectrum of voices, including those that directly confront various strategems and dirty fighting of the left without being constrained by slavish adherence to the Marquess of Queensberry rules. We need to learn from what our competitors are doing and not doing and also from our mistakes.

Providing Superior Services

Since our main goal is to encourage open dialogue and spread our message, we would be very flexible in helping consumers receive and manage our message. For example, we'd make it easy to retrieve archives, search for particular segments of interest, create notifications when user-specified subjects are to be discussed and so on.

Many of our programs would be more enjoyable because they wouldn't constantly be interrupted by annoying commercials which usually undermines any genuinely thoughtful exploration of a topic. Our shows would also be more interesting because we would enable full discussions unconstrained by the chains of political correctness. More accurately, we'd want to create several different virtual channels that would cater to different segments. One important target audience are the large group of Whites mostly brainwashed by anti-White ideology, so the channels targeting them would be more subtle and circumspect in countering the normal MSM propaganda while raising questions about typical MSM assumptions and values. As consumers are deprogrammed, hopefully many would begin exploring more blunt alternatives.

Since the most important parts of our alternative media would be highly truth focused, we could provide much more background and raw data for interested consumers to see the validity of our reporting. For example, detailed collections of legal documents, perhaps with a few blackouts for the reasonable privacy of innocent parties or irrelevant personal details, FOIA requests and their responses or denials, would be linked to stories, along with more background information and full interview transcripts, press conferences, etc. The goal is to provide much more raw material allowing truth auditing than the press normally provides. This sort of truth auditing can be done by well-organized teams of people.

Other sources could be linked or excerpted under fair use. With some improved software tools some of this effort may not be all that difficult and over time very powerful resources could be built up exploring many issues. For example related stories, topics, background, and many other facets could be interrelated. The tools could also be provided to consumers to help them deftly navigate and search these resources as well as enabling an extensive community that would ultimately help recruit further members and volunteers, while allowing vigorous debate with opponents which would help us sharpen our understanding and arguments, or even make corrections or alter our viewpoint when we're wrong.

Alternative Supplements and Watchdogs to Existing Media

I plan to do a separate post discussing a variety of information services that would act as resources for White advocacy and other topics, but one valuable service is the media watchdog. Some already exist, like Media Research Center, but it seemed to have a somewhat partisan GOP and neoconservative slant when I last followed it off-and-on a few years ago. Sometimes we could make use of existing media watchdogs, but we'd also want our own to expose media bias, manipulation and propaganda based on our concerns.

One very important service would be to dissect MSM stories and shows showing exactly how they lie, omit, distort and otherwise dishonestly report the news. Analysis of how they serve other interests could also be done, including navigating the web of corporate and financial relationships linking various power structures.

Part of the offerings would be classic examples of the various propaganda techniques to educate and sensitize the public to dishonest reporting, while another part would be ongoing analysis of everyday news. Much of this everyday analysis could be done by an organized set of amateur volunteers who could be trained and managed by more sophisticated leaders. They could also use powerful information tools and databases to explore other stories and facts related to the story. This technique could be applied to local, regional, national and international stories and the MSM stories could be linked to corresponding alternative media treatments or to alternative media supplements that provide additional details that the MSM left out. By providing these politically incorrect details that the MSM loves to omit, alternative media will both weaken the public's trust in the MSM while enhancing their own reputation.

Some Miscellaneous Thoughts

One key requirement for building these alternative media starting with limited resources is to begin organizing and managing those resources available to us more intelligently and strategically. By pooling a relatively modest contribution of money, time, intelligence, creativity, energy and drive from tens and hundreds of thousands of volunteers, we could achieve far more than just complaining over the internet. I plan to discuss this in a separate post.

Our new media organizations would periodically be infiltrated by leftists and others desiring to undermine them. We would need to be cautious to prevent them from undermining the trust that must be built up slowly and carefully. Since a key value is honesty and transparency, there aren't any particular secrets to hide, but we must still think strategically about how they might try to undermine our fledgling institutions using dirty tricks.

We'll need a group of White advocacy lawyers and legal organizations to help defend against various attacks from our opponents, including frivilous lawsuits designed to consume our resources and energy. If they play dirty, we can also use our creativity to return the favor.

If a censorship regime is created here, we'd need to apply a wide-ranging strategy to overcome this. This is actually a real issue, because many parts of the White world are already facing creeping totalitarianism and censorship much more serious than the US. We'll likely need to help support and strengthen many technologies and services designed to evade censorship and government control. We'd likely have to work on dispersing our content across many countries worldwide and helping average people learn how to work around official censorship using various software tools. Fortunately we wouldn't be alone because there any many different groups working to overcome government censorship.

It's also important to remember that not everyone in the government is happy with the direction things are moving, so one important goal is to encourage our natural allies within many elite-dominated institutions to help undermine the elite and corporate power grabs, corruption and malfeasance.