Wednesday, November 3, 2010


I'm responding atypicalwhite's recent comment to provide an update for my readers since this blog has been mute for so long.

This has been a difficult year for me. I am in a transition period where I want to significantly change what I've been doing. I don't want to be a wage slave working for corporations and the system so I'm trying to follow Kievsky's advice to change my career to be more independent.

Also, I've had great difficulty writing and editing my posts. I have lots-and-lots of posts and ideas, but I look at what I've written and consider it to be crap that has a ways to go to be presentable.

Part of the problem is a kind of rage where I'm still trying to assimulate all the things I've learned about the true shape of the world and our people, including 911 and many more appalling lies and evils. I'm naturally kinda hot-headed so its tougher for me than more cool-headed folks. So my writing becomes too polemical and bitter. I know I need to focus on being constructive and making a useful contribution, and to do so I need to properly sublimate the anger into something beneficial and positive.

I believe there is significant evidence that 911 was a false-flag operation designed to create support for American involvement in Middle Eastern wars for the benefit of Israel and, perhaps, the domestic military-industrial complex (and whatever other actors we need a real investigation to identify).

I have a post I'm working on about 911 but I'm trying to tone it down and consider whether my suspicion that 911 might be the key to bringing down the whole rotten system is plausible or ridiculously grandiose.

If explosives were used to bring down the three WTC towers as much analysis and investigation suggests, then 911 was the greatest act of treason in American history. That's because it would've been a cold-blooded, premeditated mass murder of Americans that was falsely blamed on Muslims in order to launch wars of aggression that have likely killed millions of innocent victims, squandered TRILLIONS of dollars of American treasure, devastated foreign peoples, their property and societies, and brought many calamities to our people and society, including a deep erosion of our civil liberties. All based on a vicious pack of lies by the true mass murderers. By the way the real mass murderers justified these wars because of the mass murder. So if they've been caught red-handed, by their own logic, we can use their own arguments to punish WHO? HOW?

How can a supposedly free and democratic society tolerate even 1/10 of the doubt that we currently have with 911 truth evidence and analysis when all that is asked is for a real investigation? If they have nothing to hide, they should be glad to clear their "good names".

Everyone should check out 911 truth, including Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth and their youtube channel. There have some new videos on the scientific investigations of evidence for controlled demolitions using nano-thermite.

I'll save the rest of 911 for my upcoming posts.

I'm also going to launch a Tech Talk series where I'll discuss various computer topics that I hope will benefit some folks. I'll discuss topics like why Linux/BSD and Open Source make a lot of sense for White advocates, making an isolated secure computer, some ways to improve your security practices, and ways to retrieve web and video content for offline storage (and retransmission hopefully instead of only reading it online (sneak peek: two useful utilities: youtube-dl (URL: and wget (URL:

I'm also trying to break up some of my mega posts like "Alternative Culture" and "Improved Organization" into smaller pieces that will be easier to finish and easier to read. They've spiraled into giant sets of ideas (that would be at least small book length as prose) that I've found difficult to finish because I'm unhappy with the quality of the organization and writing.

Look for at least one post within one week.

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Terminology Thoughts

Has anyone coined the word "chutzpocrisy" yet?

Yup. They have. Although it doesn't seem to be widely used.

This term combining "chutzpah" and "hypocrisy" should refer to the outrageous hypocrisy commonly seen among many outspoken anti-White Jews who advocate one thing for themselves and something radically different for the Other. For example, they advocate nation-destroying and genocidal policies for Whites while simultaneously advocating the exact opposite for themselves and their ethnostate of Israel.

A recent concrete example is the Jewish conniption fit over Arizona's new anti-illegal-alien law when Israel has always and continues to do far more repressive things to the Palestinians and other aliens in Israel or Israeli-occupied Palestine.

Likewise with securing the border with Mexico. How dare we enforce the border or build an effective wall. Yet Israel gets to build an effective wall propped up with tens of billions in American wealth while we get called neo-nazi-racist-hater-bigot-white-supremacists(TM) for daring to advocate the preservation of our nation and people.

The list goes on. and on and on. and on some more. and more and more and more.

I could keep going but you get the point.

Another formulation I like is ORCS for "Our" Repressive "Civil" Society.

This would replace a fixture in my previous posts, the accurate but tediously long: "Our" "Civil" Society.

I quote "Our" ironically because it definitely isn't ours. Instead it is dominated by a hostile, alien Jewish supremacist elite; corrupt, soulless, shabbos goy White traitors; antagonistic Blacks; imported foreign tools and naive White true believers suckered by the long occult war [thanks Kievsky!] against Whites suffusing most corners of our society and culture.

Likewise "Civil Society" has fully earned its contemptous quotes, since it seethes with malevolent incivility. The greasy lie of "civility" is a total fraud, a ploy to gull the lifelong brainwashed into believing that this vicious, oppressive, lying, anti-White, non-White-supremacist totalitarian system is actually concerned with civility or its ostensible aims.

I always contemptuously laugh when the anti-White power structure trowels out rhetorical slop like "hurtful", "creating a safe space", "dialogue" and "opposing hate". Somehow the lofty rhetoric applies to EVERYONE BUT WHITES. Plenty of "hurtful" things are said constantly within and by ORCS about Whites and that's definitely a feature, not a bug!

"Creating a Safe Space" is a total fraud since the literal rape and murder of Whites is frantically ignored and covered up. The recent murders of Whites at Kent State are but one example.

The true purpose of "Creating a Safe Space" and the other cultural Marxist shibboleths is the destruction of freedom of speech and inquiry by banning speech, thoughts or activism that threaten the current Jewish-and-non-White-supremacist hegemonic system.

As usual in the Kwa, racist anti-White double standards actually rule. Whites are subjected to an Orwellian narrative about "White privilege", "White power", "White racism", "White supremacism" with the delusional pretense that this hateful attack on Whites, their identity, history and peoplehood is "speaking truth to power".

Yeah, right. Whites are SOOOOO powerful that NOT ONE politician, dean, "civic leader" or power broker is openly pro-White. Instead nearly every one of them parrots diversity blather and "white guilt" under the steel gaze of our commissariat. Those straying too far from the party line suffer consequences including job loss, ostracism and public humiliation.

This intellectually dishonest, barbaric treatment starts far before any traces of actual pro-White advocacy. To question any of the patently false dogma ruling the Kwa invites swift and terrible punishment as Nobel Prize winner James Watson and many others discovered.

In actuality, the power structure of the Kwa enforces the privilege, power, racism and supremacism of Jews and non-Whites over Whites.

This power desperately needs a LOT of truth spoken to it.

Turn On, Tune In, Drive Out [the ORCS!]

Updated Thursday, May 27, 2010.

  • Tweaked a few awkward phrasings.
  • Added a few sentences.