Showing posts with label Whiteness Studies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Whiteness Studies. Show all posts

Friday, September 4, 2009

Black365 and Non-White Supremacism

James Edwards had a piece recently about McDonalds and their promotion of a program and web site named black365 "celebrating Black culture ...".

McDonalds pioneered multicultural advertising decades ago, particularly supporting a strong pro-Black identity. We should start a new healthy restaurant chain called MacDonalds catering to Whites. The golden arches could be replaced by a big White W. :)

I fully agree with James Edwards' point about the massive double standards employed by multinational corporations and other institutions that promote non-White identity while NEVER doing the same for Whites. About the only time corporations or advertisers explicitly mention White identity is to mock or subvert it, e.g. Whites can't dance or Whites are uptight.

Far more common is the implicit treatment of Whites through subtexts which serves three major functions. First, they constantly denigrate White identity, history, culture, attitudes, character and peoplehood, unlike non-White groups, which are respected and shown positively (the only exception being Arabs and Muslims who are sometimes demonized: guess why?). The goal is clearly to destroy any explicitly White group identity and self-esteem. Second, they illustrate "proper" thinking and behavior to define the bounds of accepted White identity. Whites not accepting their assigned safe and submissive role are shown as evil and contemptible (nazis, klansmen, haters, militia "nuts", etc). Everyone gets the message, if only subconsciously. Third, they train non-Whites, including recent immigrants, to see Whites as a hated class to be attacked and displaced in the future.

The only accepted "traditional" White identity is to be a patriotard tool of warmongering Zionists and globalists who push other people around in their own countries because the whole world really, really wants to be like America! Support "democracy"!!!

These subtexts are literally millions of subtle cues embedded throughout the totality of "our" cultural and entertainment programming. Even though no one sees all or even most of the full set of programming, the average person grows up seeing at least tens of thousands of these anti-White subtexts in thousands of different programs. They become signficant because instead of being randomly distributed in a balanced way, they are systematically biased against Whites. Just watch TV on a typical night and you'll see dozens of examples.

The anti-White bias is obvious by comparing the corresponding treatment of non-Whites and Jews (Jews are exquisitely sensitive to the slightest of slights) using the "identity interchange" test. If the commonly accepted anti-White subtexts had the identities exchanged with a non-White, the non-White advocates would be livid with rage at the racist propaganda being spread about their people! It's great for Whites though!

Ultimately they want to program Whites (and non-Whites) to behave as servants to their agendas. Our children are cut off from the brilliant accomplishments of their ancestors and the heights and nobility of a healthy White culture and society. Instead they're encouraged to be docile little consumers buying corporate junk manufactured overseas from corporate retail zones next to corporate-built suburbs mostly built with cheap illegal alien labor. These suburbs are meant to be a tacit place of safety using wealth as a barrier instead of ethnocentrism, until the next round of immigration and Black criminal subclass resettlement starts the process over again, leading to fat profits for the controllers managing the process.

Isn't modern America such a wonderful land of opportunity? Our founding fathers would be so proud!

These constant media images of Whites are a crucial pillar in creating and enforcing anti-White double standards in our "civil society". The news, entertainment and advertising propaganda machines wield massive influence over most sectors of our society including a significant fraction of our intellectual elites.

One current repulsive example of White-demeaning advertisting is this AT&T commercial where a gay-seeming White guy apparently lives in a big house in a suburban neighborhood surrounded by a carefully chosen multicultural crew consisting of a normal Asian man and three children: a Latino boy and White girl who are silent, and an Asian girl, the center and leader of the children. The Asian girl plays the role of a ghetto-speaking Black woman from a soap opera because the gay White guy has asked the neighborhood kids to help him "catch up on his soaps" because he's already apparently recording two other shows during the airtime of the soaps.

This is the ideal White man according to our cultural programmers: one who won't reproduce, will happily acquiesce in his people's displacement (and isn't even aware he's part of a people other than "American"), is happily multiculturalist, lives a hedonistic lifestyle, is practically a women (and won't be hunting, fishing, owning guns or have any survival skills) and enthusiastically submits to brainwashing by our elite masters.

Why do we give our money to these anti-White corporations?

Isn't it great that Whites have such a great sense of humor that they're OK with being constantly ridiculed unlike all the other groups that demand respect?

No it's not. It's because Whites are cowed into submission by an evil, anti-White, uncivil society that despises them but that controls most levers of power and uses them aggressively to oppress Whites, attacks their identity, legally steals their wealth and transfers it to non-White colonizers, ungrateful Blacks or various corrupt forces, and then tars any White dissenters and resisters as "racists", "bigots", "fascists", "neo-nazis" and "white supremacists".

Ultimately, it's perfectly reasonable that Jews, Blacks and others feel racial solidarity and behave ethnocentrically and even that powerful organizations pander to them.

What's NOT OK is that Whites engaging in logically equivalent beliefs and activism are falsely smeared as Nazis, Klansmen or White supremacists by non-White supremacists, especially by powerful and wealthy Jewish and crypto-Jewish organizations and their toadies throughout our "civil society", including the government, corporations, advertising, Hollywood, the MSM and the educational industrial complex. And for almost everyone in the US the propaganda machine has reinforced THOUSANDS of times that those labels represent the worst possible evil.

Whites must stop tolerating these double standards against us and only us. We need to make it crystal clear that anything but full acceptance of White advocacy and ethnocentrism while all others are both tolerated and encouraged is NON-WHITE SUPREMACISM. I googled this term a while back and found a few scattered references to it so this is an existing but rare concept. It deserves to become just as mainstream as "white supremacism".

We must start calling things by their true names instead of participating in the swarm of lies and obfuscations that enable the anti-White Matrix to pass itself off as a colorblind society that is supposedly just.

Colorblind is a con.

America is anti-White and non-white supremacist.

Try these on for size: Black supremacism, Jewish supremacism, Hispanic Supremacism, Asian supremacism. When non-White advocates believe they have more rights than Whites they are SUPREMACISTS. They need to start hearing this accurate description of their rhetoric and behavior. Oppressed Whites need to learn this tool of understanding and self defense.

While the anti-White activists bring up false anti-White doctrines like "White Privilege" the reality of our society, when normalizing for ability and behavior, is "non-White Privilege", especially Black and Jewish Privilege. Whenever anyone tries to fling the pathetic accusation of White privilege, Whites should immediately point to the success of groups like Blacks, Asians and Jews which typically have better outcomes than Whites per capita, especially Jews, whose outcomes are staggeringly higher than Whites in terms of wealth, elite education, media ownership and influence, academic position, campaign finance, elite government positions, etc. Hmmm, how come stories about Jewish influence NEVER EVER appear in the mainstream media while LOTS of anti-White or White-critical stories DO? It must be all that White Privilege typically taught by Jewish or non-White professors and activists. It was enlightening to see the Whiteness Studies conference that had a Shabbat dinner on Friday night in their official schedule as well as a roster containing a majority of Jewish and non-White participants.

When a large enough group of Whites drop out of the anti-White Matrix and create alternative institutions that empower and protect Whites, their identity, history, culture and peoplehood, the existing institutions will be forced to either adapt or reveal their raw hatred and oppression of Whites. This large group must be led by a vanguard. Some early pioneers have been at it for decades. Now more of us are joining their efforts. We need to keep widening the circle and to tolerate different kinds of pro-Whites, including the shaky ones in the middle starting with pro-White training wheels.

Part of the problem is that Whites have been so deracinated (cut off from their roots) and indoctrinated in White-self-hatred that our culture and identity is a shambles for the vast majority of our brethren. We probably can't fully recover what we once had but we can draw from the best of our heritage and forge a new spirit and culture for our people. We also might not be able to create a monolithic, unitary culture, but if we have several White cultures that mostly share a core of common values across different belief systems, that will be infinitely preferable to our current atomization and deracination. The largest split among pro-Whites is probably between Christians and non-Christians. We should not worry about all Whites having to fit some specific ideology or set of values. Support pro-White diversity!

Some Whites will always be implacable enemies. Fine. Let them pursue their suicidal path in their own spaces and we can pursue our destiny separately. Good riddance. Divorce is the solution.

In time we can create a White Renaissance.

It will take much time and effort to counteract the massive 24x7 anti-White control program that's been operating unimpeded for many decades.

Essentially every piece of our "civil society" must have alternative institutions by and for Whites promoting our interests. I've already discussed alternative institutions in detail regarding higher education in a non-racial manner and alternative media promoting White advocacy. I also explored White separation.

We also need institutions and organizations that subvert the existing ones while not being rabidly or even overtly pro-White. We need to recruit Whites from the middle and take them a step at a time to full-blown White advocacy, ethnocentrism and nationalism. A major attack vector are those areas of our "civil society" that promote lies, anti-White bias or non-White supremacism. Trust in these institutions is already low. When average people see professional quality stories with fully documented details available that expose the lies, distortions and propaganda of the current system, cynicism and distrust will strengthen dramatically and faith and trust will be transferred to the new alternative sources. Anti-White crime is an massive opportunity that needs to be exploited to destroy trust in the current lying system. It wouldn't be an issue if they weren't such vicious lying anti-White bigots so they deserve no sympathy.

A major barrier to building pro-White institutions is the current dominance of anti-White racism by "civil society". Budding pro-Whites are assaulted by powerful and wealthy groups like the ADL and $PLC and many other groups coordinated with allies in Hollywood, the MSM, academia, government, corporations and other commanding heights in our society. It will be a long-term struggle to gain our rights and justice. We already have some organizations working for our interests, so let's support them however we can, even if only to spread awareness through personal connections.

There are other areas I'd like to discuss, including my long-promised alternative cultural post, which is one of the most important alternatives needed because it is the most powerful force brainwashing most Whites. The sheer repetition of anti-White and pro-multicultural ideology over the full lifetime of most citizens, including the numerous subtle subtexts, is difficult for most people to escape. But imagine a full offering of cultural programming that is pro-White with many of the subtexts and meta-messages inverted from their anti-White bigotry. I believe when many Whites are exposed to hundreds and thousands of hours of pro-White cultural programming, White advocacy will become a mass movement including both our average and cognitive elite populations.

It can happen in stages too, where a small nucleus of Whites create and distribute this pro-White content and then gain an modest audience that then grows as the truth, hope and justice of our side inspire more and more Whites to escape their brainwashing.

We must build our institutions and their broad acceptance piece-by-piece from the bottom up. We can use our talent and spirit to create something authentic even if we have limited resources compared to our oppressors. Some of these pieces are already in place, like some of the organizations I link to. We must start within our own families, friends and communities. We must contest the universally accepted anti-White bigotry and those who promote it.

The future is uncertain. We must work to prepare ourselves for any contingency that comes our way.

We'll know we're made progress when large business interests start fearing the anger the White community and pander to us the way they pander to non-Whites.

nativeamerican365, black365, jew365, raza365, asian365 are all fully supported by "our" "civil society".

white365 must be too.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Some Comments Over at Roissy's

Update: 2009-04-29: 2nd update

I've actually done a bunch more posts (16+) on the second thread mentioned below. And they involve a lot of interaction with some other posters, including a typical Jewish, bad-faith douchebag. Head on over to Roissy's and check it out! I'm probably gonna be too lazy to copy all of these over to this post when you all can just read it all in context. That'll leave more time to finish up my giant post on subverting the MSM I hope to publish within a day or two.

Update: 2009-04-29

I've followed Latte Island's suggestion to copy the comments here as a courtesy. There are some very thoughtful commenters over at Roissy's though, so you might want to check them out in their full context, as well as some other commenters running other conversations that are interesting.

Original post with some editing

I've posted a number of somewhat long comments on two of Roissy's recent posts, discussing topics like Jews, Blacks, Whites, "civil society", immigration, etc.

The first thread discusses immigration and the demographic transformation of California.

First Thread: Text Message Of Dire Portent

First CommentLocal Copy of Comment
Second CommentLocal Copy of Comment
Third CommentLocal Copy of Comment

In the second thread I make much longer comments covering a variety of topics.

Second Thread: Sobering Thought of the Day


First CommentLocal Copy of Comment
Second CommentLocal Copy of Comment
Third CommentLocal Copy of Comment
Forth CommentLocal Copy of Comment

Roissy and some of his commenters are sharp and have interesting things to say.

If I make some more comments later, I'll add more links above. You all can also just jump to the thread and search for my handle, or you certainly might like reading over other folks comments as well.

I'm also working on a long post (and have been for a while) on ideas for subverting and replacing the mainstream media. I hope to have it finished in a day or two.

I'm curious whether folks like my giant posts, which I hope are somewhat logically coherent in covering a subject, or whether you all would like me to break them up into smaller chunks, perhaps with a "table of contents" post for a set of them. I'm not sure if they're so long, it gets to be a trial to read the whole thing.

Thread 1: Comment 1


Yeah, but how old are you G?

Are you over 45?

Thread 1: Comment 2


Well said Lucius.

To detail the implications of my question to G, California has radically changed demographically over the last 60 years, particularly since the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.

You can view the historical ethnic demographics for the US, including California at the US Census Bureau in Excel or PDF files.

The results for California (through 1990) indicate:








Year%White%Black% non-Hispanic White
194095.501.889.49
195093.664.4N/A
196091.975.6N/A
197089.017.0N/A but 76.27 from 15% sample, 78.00 from 5% sample
198076.187.766.60
199068.977.457.22
200659.86.243

The last line comes from the 2006 ACS Estimates according to Wikipedia.

So there have been large and rapid changes to ethnic demographics in California (no surprise).

Our traitorous elites would like to Californicate the rest of the country the same way if they can get away with it.

We shouldn’t let them.

Thread 1: Comment 3


@G

My point was that if you were a young man, you wouldn’t have been alive to witness the full scope of the demographic changes in California. You’ve only witnessed the latest incremental step in our out-of-control immigration, which might not look that radical if seen from the perspective of, say, ten years (although I’ve actually seen many natives report how much worse it has gotten over the last 10 years.


Thread 2: Comment 1


Obsidian said:

Voodude makes a powerful point that I’ve been thinking about for awhile now-why are people, who don’t live among or even near such “others” spend so much time thinking, writing, ruminating about said “others”? I mean, its pretty clear that Roissy and others, take great care not to rub elbows w/NAMs in any major way, if at all.

So…wassup with that?

To answer your point about rubbing elbows with NAMs, our "civil rights" laws deny the historic right of free association, so it is both illegal and abhorred by our "civil society" for a group of Whites to segregate themselves away (it's kosher for Jews though). As the country becomes more non-White, it will become more difficult to escape the third worlding of this country unless you have wealth or power. The old White ethnic neighborhoods of yesteryear that provided community and safety for non-elites are now a forbidden dream.

So why think about these issues? Because we're rationally analyzing the future of this country based on current trends and don't like what we see.

We already have plenty of evidence in from many areas of the country, like California, Florida, Arizona, New York, with the following results: wire-pulling-elites-living-in-gated-communities-with-lots-of-wealth? life is goooood! middle-and-working-class? life is not so goooood!

I personally get along well with foreigners and have always been interested in foreign cultures, languages and peoples. But in the same way that I respect those other groups and countries and don't think globalism should level all countries into controlled consumer cattle, or that the US should be imperialistically dictating to them, I respect my own nation and people and don't want to see it heavily colonized and transformed into something alien, particularly since this has been engineered very dishonestly. It's now "racist" to speak out against the transformation, while in 1965 it was promised that no such transformation would occur, in order to pass the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. Likewise with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 where a "one-time" amnesty would be granted in exchange for future immigration control and border enforcement. They've lied through their teeth every time and deserve no more trust or credibility.

An example of what our elites have planned for us comes from america2050.org which is sponsored by some left wing foundations, global corporations and the Jewish J.M. Kaplan Fund.

Here's a quote:

America 2050 is a national initiative to meet the infrastructure, economic development and environmental challenges of the nation as we prepare to add about 130 million additional Americans by the year 2050.

America 2050 is guided by the National Committee for America 2050, a coalition of regional planners, scholars, and policy-makers to develop a framework for the nation's future growth that considers trends such as:

* Rapid population growth and demographic change
* Global climate change
* The rise in foreign trade
* Sprawling and inefficient land use patterns
* Uneven and inequitable growth within and between regions
* Infrastructure systems that are reaching capacity
* The emergence of megaregions

Look at the passion the Jewish J.M. Kaplan Fund has for "Migrations":

The Fund aims to support: a) comprehensive immigration policy reform for the United States; and b) the integration of immigrants into local and national communities. The former aim is pursued through grants for public education and advocacy. The latter is pursued by efforts, initiated by the Fund, to: bolster local immigrant-friendly policies and programs; highlight immigrant contributions to the commonweal; and establish, with the Migration Policy Institute, a new award – the E Pluribus Unum Prize – intended to honor government agencies, non-profit organizations, businesses, and individuals who have succeded in integrating recent immigrants and adding value to the larger community.

I wonder if the Kaplan family support the same policies for Israel that they do for the US? We've got plenty of third world non-Jews we could ship off to Israel so they too can enjoy the magically enriching benefits of diversity (Our Greatest Strength! TM) and marginalization within their own land.

Thread 2: Comment 2


Obsidian,

Thanks for your courteous reply. Let me answer your questions in two posts. Here's part one.

I'd be interested in hearing your ideas and opinions about the content of my posts.

I'm also curious if you believe our "civil society" is anti-White or not (e.g. Hollywood, mainstream media, academia, K12 education, government, etc)

Let me answer your second question first. Freedom of association is being denied to Whites when they can't create and participate in ethnocentric organizations, either legally or through social sanction. For example, the typical university has dozens of ethnic organizations catering to Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Jews (as an ethnic group) and so on, but if Whites even establish non-racial organizations like Youth for Western Civilization, they are excoriated and shunned as racists and get their own $PLC bulletins. Again, this is NOT a White group, but they are effectively treated as if they were and considered beyond the pale.

So if Whites tried to establish White Engineers, White Student Association, White Lawyers, etc, they would be condemned as bigoted Nazis and their future career prospects harmed. Such are the blatant double standards governing our "civil society". Another example, in the House of Representatives, the Congressional Black Caucus has refused to seat White representatives who represent majority Black districts. Can you imagine our "civil society" approving of remotely similar behavior for any White group (such White groups aren't even allowed right now, meaning, they are technically legal, but anyone participating in an explicitly White ethnocentric organization is outcast as a racist Nazi, particularly by Jews, who have TONS of rabidly ethnocentric organziations for themselves)?

Another facet to traditional freedom of association was the ability of neighborhoods to legally control their ethnic or racial composition. This was overturned in the 1960s and unscrupulous real estate moguls used these legal tools to destroy ethnic neighborhoods, while making handsome profits and ensuring a constant supply of new customers with Whites continually being pushed to new, temporarily safe, expensive areas. In many cases remaining Whites and their children would suffer violence as the neighborhoods deteriorated. Detroit is a classic, if extreme, example. "White flight" was really ethnic cleansing against Whites in many cases.

You yourself have discussed the violent nature of Black urban areas in previous posts. Frankly many Whites want nothing to do with such environments. If a certain subgroup of Blacks prefer a thuggish and violent lifestyle, I'm OK with them pursuing such a life within their own spaces, but Whites, particularly non-elite, non-wealthy, Whites should also be allowed to pursue a healthy, safe environment for themselves and their families and defend their own spaces against violent aggression.

The next facet of your point revolves around the replacement for traditional freedom of association by the new implicit freedom based on wealth. So wealthy people can escape to nice areas filled with nicer people (excepting the recent trend toward Section 8 housing that intermixes some of the thuggish subclasses into areas they otherwise couldn't afford, although they normally target the middle class and not the rich). California now has many gated communities for just this purpose, analogous to long standing Latin American patterns for separating the classes. These were unnecessary before our recent "enrichment" by diversity.

So you are correct that since a larger number of Blacks are less wealthy, they are more limited in where they may live. It's not a legal restriction but an economic restriction that statistically affects Blacks more than most other populations.

One reason Blacks have a bad reputation as a group is their tolerance and coddling of the thuggish subclass responsible for so much crime and violence. Most Black leadership defends and excuses their bad behavior instead of properly condemning it. I also believe a disturbing portion of the non-thuggish Black majority shares this attitude and sympathizes with them, at least when they're sticking it to Whitey. Given all the anti-White propaganda coursing through our popular culture, educational system and so on, it's not too surprising that so many Blacks have a lot of anti-White hostility.

Thread 2: Comment 3


Obsidian,

Here's part two dealing with your first question.

The "short" answer for why Jews have both historically and currently are pushing so hard for third world immigration into America is that they consider this in their group interests. Professor Kevin MacDonald has documented in great detail in three books written during the 1990s. They benefit while displacing their traditional competitors, Whites, who they distrust as potential Nazis. This is demonstrated by a notorious quote by Jewish activist Earl Raab, from Chapter 7 of "Culture of Critique"):

The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible—and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever.
(Earl Raab, Jewish Bulletin, 1993 February 19, 23)

They are benefiting by displacing the traditional WASP leadership of the country while they fit in as "White" even though they have a great deal of hostility for the traditional population, which is frequently masked euphemistically as contempt for "flyover country". Many Jewish commentators including David Gelernter, Ben Stein and Michael Medved have discussed this.

An example of very disproportionally Jewish representation is their enrollment in top-tier universities, which then provide the most prestigious manpower for other elite institutions in government, media, academia, business, Wall Street, etc.

Look at the numbers of Jews attending various elite universities: THAT'S DISPROPORTIONATE! Where's the liberal and diversicrat outrage for 2% of the population taking 38% of Northwestern, 33% of Washington University (St. Louis), 30% of Yale, 28% of the University of Pennsylvania, 25.5% of Harvard, 25% of Brown, Columbia and Cornell, 21% of NYU, 18.3% of Michigan, etc? (NOTE: these are all outstanding schools and nearly all outstanding schools have way more than 2% Jews: do your own search: e.g. Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is about 10% Jewish as is UC Berkeley: Those are large campuses that are 5 times disproportionate). Since Jews are categorized as White it turns out that (non-Jewish) Whites are strongly underrepresented at many elite universities, if we want to follow the affirmative action bean counting so sacred to our "civil society".

Of course, since Ashkenazi (European) Jews have an average IQ of around 110, it is to be expected that they will be somewhat overrepresented among the intellectual elites, but part of their disproportion also comes from ethnocentrism. For example, several years ago a study was done analyzing the citations of scientific papers and they discovered that Jewish authors tended to disproportionally cite other Jews and cite them more heavily, which could enhance their careers, since a major metric of academic success was how frequently your publications were cited.

Historically Jews across the broad spectrum of beliefs and organizations were nearly universally supportive of scrapping the traditional immigration restrictions, like the national origin quota, while in modern times, it is still extremely popular, but some dissenters have appeared, mostly because they fear the impact of Muslim immigration.

If not for the Jewish activism in promoting these policies, it never would've happened as thoroughly documented by Kevin MacDonald in his The Culture of Critique with Chapter 7 focusing on their role in overturning the national origin quota in 1965.

An excellent source for further exploring these issues is The Occidental Observer which contains many articles with copious links to additional sources of information. A basic philosophy of this site is that Whites should organize and behave ethnocentrically just as much as other groups, like Blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews, are allowed and encouraged too.

Our civil society is now explicitly rejecting the color-blind society. For example, consider the many publically funded institutes at universities staffed by taxpayer-funded academics, like The Kirwan Institute.

Here's a full quote for context with particularly interesting parts in bold:

For some time now, the push for colorblind discourses, policies and practices around race and ethnicity in the United States has become more and more pronounced. Some justify this push with reference to the mistaken belief that nowadays racial identity has only marginal effects on a person's or group’s social interactions or access to social and economic opportunity. Some advocates for colorblindness go further: more than superfluous, they say, race talk of any kind is inherently divisive and pernicious.

At Kirwan, we agree that all too often implicit and explicit race talk has indeed been used to divide and alienate. At the same time, we believe colorblindness, though sometimes urged by people and organizations with the best intentions, is a mistake—one with profound consequences. The critical question is not whether to use race, but how to talk about race in a variety of contexts. That question is an empirical one we engage in through a number of projects. In some cases we specifically examine how people talk about race and how such conversations impact their behavior. In other work we look at how issue "frames" operate. And in still other projects we look at the efficacy of using class-based or universal policy approaches to racial matters.

In the Diversity Advancement Project, for example, the Institute is collaborating with the Center for Social Inclusion to develop strategies to increase public support for racial, ethnic and gender diversity in our public and private institutions. Our project on Democratic Merit aims to push colleges and universities toward greater investment in those communities and students whose success is needed to enhance the health and strength of our multiracial democracy. And in our projects on African American-Immigrant coalition building, we work to understand the conditions and contexts that facilitate constructive, institutionalized relationships across lines of race and nativity, and those that tend to undermine or preclude such relationships.

It is impossible to quickly summarize all of this work, much of it ongoing. What we can say is that context, audience, and environment all matter in determining how best to promote racial justice. We can also say that, drawing on our own efforts and those of numerous colleagues and experts, we expect to make steady progress toward agreement on how the findings of this growing field can usefully shape our collective social justice advocacy and activist practice.

Note that brazen advocacy and politics is pursued at an academic institution funded with public money and this is only one of many. Here's another one that also lists further such scams.

Of course for all their happy academic talk about "context", their idea of fairness and balance is Whiteness Studies, which is a direct attack on Whites, our identity, history, traditions and peoplehood, in constrast to EVERY other ethnic studies, which openly advocate for their ethnic group.

Consider one of the flagships of the Whiteness Studies movement, racetraitor.org:

The white race is a historically constructed social formation. It consists of all those who partake of the privileges of the white skin in this society. Its most wretched members share a status higher, in certain respects, than that of the most exalted persons excluded from it, in return for which they give their support to a system that degrades them.

The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race, which means no more and no less than abolishing the privileges of the white skin. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue, domestic and foreign, in US society.

The existence of the white race depends on the willingness of those assigned to it to place their racial interests above class, gender, or any other interests they hold. The defection of enough of its members to make it unreliable as a predictor of behavior will lead to its collapse.

RACE TRAITOR aims to serve as an intellectual center for those seeking to abolish the white race. It will encourage dissent from the conformity that maintains it and popularize examples of defection from its ranks, analyze the forces that hold it together and those that promise to tear it apart. Part of its task will be to promote debate among abolitionists. When possible, it will support practical measures, guided by the principle, Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.

The editors publish things in RACE TRAITOR because they think that publishing them will help build a community of readers. Editorial opinions are expressed in editorials and unsigned replies to letters.

Yeah, right. "White trash" shares a more exalted status than Oprah, Chris Rock, Michael Jordon, Colin Powell or Barack Obama.

I don't see these academics ferociously calling on anyone to smash the Black race, which they would do if they were logically consistent. Likewise, Jews are much more successful than Whites (and, by transitivity, vastly more so than Blacks), yet I don't see any of them trying to deconstruct Jewishness or dismantle Jewish privilege.

F*** them and their double standards and hypocrisy.

Kevin MacDonald documents how substantial Jewish influence was mostly responsible for these "cultures of critique" (of Whites).

Thread 2: Comment 4


@chicnoir

You're correct that such national-origin organizations are permissible. But most American Whites have ancestors from many different European countries. Many government and corporate forms, including for new jobs, ask me if I'm "white", not of Irish or German descent. And since White people are demonized by Hollywood and our media and legally discriminated against by our government, this only strengthens our pan-European identity as Whites.

Some Jews argue that the Palestinian people don't really exist because they supposedly don't have a historic existence. Well, given their treatment over the last 120 years by Zionists, even if they didn't really exist two centuries ago, they sure do now.

The existence of White identity is much, much older than the anti-White leftists claim, as discussed in the comments on this thread. A few more comments down from this one, I give some excerpts and some google book searches anyone can run to see some proof.

If the pan-African Black identity is "celebrated", then White should be too.

Likewise given a Jewish identity encompassing Mizrahis, Ashkenazis, athiests, Buddhists (still considered Jews) and the full spectrum of Jewish religious belief from Reconstructionist to Haredi Jews.

Likewise for creating a synthetic "Asian" identity for American consumption. In Asia, they consider themselves Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese, Filipino, etc, first, second and third over pan-Asian.

The key insight that killed my lifelong belief in the color-blind society was that the left, as it takes over our "civil society", is motivated by hatred of Whites instead of love of non-Whites, and this is reflected in the increasing anti-White policies, rhetoric and ideology. The color-blind rhetoric was just a tool to dispossess Whites of their traditional society and as we are marginalized, ethnic politics will likely rule the day and Whites will be a hated scapegoat class, similar to the kulaks genocided in the millions by Stalinist Jews in the 1930s.

Monday, February 16, 2009

Whiteness Studies: Noel Ignatiev Also Critiques Jews

This is the first of several posts I intend to write on Whiteness Studies, a recently developed "scholarly" field that is actually populated exclusively with committed, Leftist, anti-White activists.

More disturbing is the widening power these activists and their allies wield through the placement of cadres or fellow travelers within institutions, or other forms of influence like diversity industry "training" (i.e, reeducation) in universities, K12 education, corporations, military, government and the broader society, frequently using public funds.

Noel Ignatiev is one of the Jewish leaders of the Whiteness Studies movement, a co-founder of the journal Race Traitor and the notorious source of several widely-cited, genocidal-sounding quotes. He's not a "hypocritical Jew" since he holds somewhat similar beliefs critiquing Israel, Zionism and anti-Semitism
(details below).

Below is the "What We Believe" statement from the homepage of the racetraitor.org site with some particularly incendiary quotes bolded:

The white race is a historically constructed social formation. It consists of all those who partake of the privileges of the white skin in this society. Its most wretched members share a status higher, in certain respects, than that of the most exalted persons excluded from it, in return for which they give their support to a system that degrades them.

The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race, which means no more and no less than abolishing the privileges of the white skin. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue, domestic and foreign, in US society.

The existence of the white race depends on the willingness of those assigned to it to place their racial interests above class, gender, or any other interests they hold. The defection of enough of its members to make it unreliable as a predictor of behavior will lead to its collapse.

RACE TRAITOR aims to serve as an intellectual center for those seeking to abolish the white race. It will encourage dissent from the conformity that maintains it and popularize examples of defection from its ranks, analyze the forces that hold it together and those that promise to tear it apart. Part of its task will be to promote debate among abolitionists. When possible, it will support practical measures, guided by the principle, Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.

The editors publish things in RACE TRAITOR because they think that publishing them will help build a community of readers. Editorial opinions are expressed in editorials and unsigned replies to letters.
Here's another aggressive, genocidally-worded exhortation:

Every group within white America has at one time or another advanced its particular and narrowly defined interests at the expense of black people as a race. That applies to labor unionists, ethnic groups, college students, schoolteachers, taxpayers, and white women. Race Traitor will not abandon its focus on whiteness, no matter how vehement the pleas and how virtuously oppressed those doing the pleading. The editors meant it when they replied to a reader, "Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed—not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed."
This Occidental Observer editorial disputes Ignatiev's claims of innocence in using genocidal language. He claims to not want genocide against Whites but rather to radically reorder society.

Ignatiev is a Communist desiring the revolutionary transformation of the US.

Here's the conclusion of his pamphlet Introduction to the United States: An Autonomist Political History:
A revolutionary strategy is, in short, a strategy of dual power. It is the treating of revolution as an act for today, as a part of the continuous struggle, instead of a dream to be indefinitely postponed in the interest of "realism".


From what we have said so far it should be evident that we regard the struggle against white supremacy as the most advanced outpost of the new society and the key ingredient in a revolutionary strategy. The waging of that struggle among whites is the main distinctive task of STO, as befits its character as an organization made up of white people.
Here's the Google Book Link. The pamphlet was originally published in 1980 and then reprinted in 1992.

More recently, from an interview conducted on St. Patrick's Day in 1996:
Now if there were five or ten per cent counterfeit whites around—people who looked white but really weren’t—then, I think, the white skin would lose its value. The judge, the school principal, the cop, the social worker, the personnel officer at the plant—and all of the other people who implement and carry out the racial tracking of our society—would no longer be sure about how to perform their function. The white race would undergo some kind of fission or self-destruction, and we would open up to the possibilities that could transform this country from the nightmare that it has been into the dream that it might be.
And from: Abolutionism and "White Studies": (last paragraph)
The task of the nineteenth century was to abolish slavery. The task of the twentieth century was to end legal segregation. The next task facing the American people is the abolition of the white race as a social category. The movement to abolish slavery stimulated women's rights and other reform movements. The Civil Rights movement helped give birth to the counterculture and various oppositional movements. Today nothing offers a greater likelihood of revolutionizing the political climate than a comprehensive challenge to whiteness and its ways.
It should be recognized that although Ignatiev is a self-described non-believing Jew, he forcefully denounces some of the most important Jewish interests as understood by many Jews:
  • The right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state
  • The use of anti-Semitism accusations to restrict debate about Israel and Jewish influence
  • The causes of Anti-Semitism being only evil Gentiles
He loudly condemns Zionism and considers Israel a racist state. His proposed solution is a unified non-sectarian Palestine including both Jews and Palestinians without any legal favoritism for Jews, and with Palestinians having the Right of Return, full legal rights and financial assistance. Obviously very few Jews accept this solution, since it destroys their conception of Israel as a Jewish ethnostate, and, in the real world, Ignatiev's proposed solution would likely lead to the eventual subjugation or genocide of most Israeli Jews. Of course, Israel is in an extremely difficult long-term strategic position no matter what approach they take, particularly with the fast-approaching proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

Hilariously, he uses the example of South Africa to reassure Israelis to gamble on the good faith of the Palestinians for their survival:
...the establishment of majority rule did not cause the gods to weep or the earth to open and swallow the people...
I wonder why didn't he use Zimbabwe as a heartwarming example of post-racial brotherhood?

Of course South Africa is puttering along behind Zimbabwe by one or two decades but is following the same, drearily predictable descent.

Following are several quotes demonstrating his beliefs:

1) Israel as racial state:
Israel is a racial state, where rights are assigned on the basis of ascribed descent or the approval of the superior race. In this respect it resembles the American South prior to the passage of the Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts, Ireland under the Protestant Ascendancy, and, yes, Hitlerite Germany. But in its basic structures it most closely resembles the old South Africa. It is therefore not surprising that Israel should have developed a close alliance with South Africa when that country was still under apartheid.
2) Jewish Influence in the US:
Is one permitted to say above the level of a whisper that U.S. policy toward Israel has something to do with Jewish influence in the U.S.? Perhaps Nobel Peace Prize winner Bishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa can get away with it: "The Israel government," he observed, "is placed on a pedestal [in the U.S.] People are scared in this country to say wrong is wrong because the Jewish lobby is powerful-very powerful" (Guardian 29 April 2002). Not only does Zionism shape U.S. policy, it stifles discussion of alternatives. To cite a personal example: Two years ago a PBS reporter interviewed me on the eve of the UN-sponsored conference on racism about to be held in S. Africa. I made some remarks about Israel, and afterwards I asked her if she would use what I said. "Of course not," she replied. "I agree with you, and so do all the journalists I know, but we can't run any criticism of Israel without following it by at least ten refutations." Harvard Professor Daniel Pipes and Martin Kramer of the Middle East Forum have begun a website, Campus Watch," to denounce academics deemed to have shown "hatred of Israel." Students are to inform on professors.
3) Sources of anti-Semitism:
If I accomplish nothing else in this talk, I hope to create space for some who are repelled by Israeli actions but are held back from condemning Zionism by a desire not to be antisemitic.

Does what I have just said mean that I dismiss the possibility of a revival of anti-semitism? No, it does not. History shows that anti-semitism ebbs and flows, and that it may return. Time prevents me from exploring that history in any depth; let me instead recommend two books: The Jewish Question by Abram Leon and The Origins of Totalitarianism by Hannah Arendt (in particular the first part, "anti-semitism"). For now I will say only that anti-semitism (or more accurately anti-Jewish sentiment) is rooted neither in human nature or Christian theology; it is the product of social relations, including the historic concentration of Jews as representatives of commerce in non-commercial societies. The peculiar occupational distribution of European Jews led members of the dispossessed classes among the non-Jewish population to direct their animosity toward the Jews as the visible agents of oppression. "anti-semitism," as the 19th-century German Socialist August Bebel put it, "is the socialism of fools." It is not beyond historical explanation (as is implied by a term like "The Holocaust," which takes anti-semitism out of history and relocates it the realm of natural phenomena).
4) His proposed solution to the Israel/Palestine conflict:
What solution, therefore, do I propose? A simple and moderate one: within historic Palestine, the area between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River, live ten million people. I propose that there be established there a single state, in which every person who declares his intention to live there and adopt citizenship be recognized as a citizen and have one vote. I propose further that the special advantages given to Jews be terminated, that the Palestinians who were forced into exile after 1948, and their descendants, be granted the right to live there, and that the state undertake practical measures to make it possible for them to do so by building housing and extending to them to right to rent or buy, if necessary providing funds to help them. I propose further that both Hebrew and Arabic be declared official state languages to be taught in the schools, that all residents be granted the right to publish newspapers and maintain cultural institutions in any language they choose, that the special position of Orthodox Judaism be ended and that the state declare freedom of worship and make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
Ignatiev has also authored a five-page entry on Zionism for the Encyclopedia of Race of Racism that has been roundly condemned by many Jewish groups. This link contains a critique and a link where someone uploaded a PDF file from a photocopy of the full entry.

Future posts will consider some ideas for coping with the White-hating Left.