tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53352257999429389222024-02-08T13:28:35.750-05:00ScotchFiendScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.comBlogger22125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-13721691186260033322011-02-09T04:30:00.004-05:002011-02-11T04:29:28.204-05:00Censored by Counter Currents<b>Update: February 11, 2011</b><br />Upon reflection I believe some of my previous statements (see below for my original comment) are foolish and shortsighted.<br /><br />If I'm annoyed at the censoring of my comments at a good site like Counter Currents, I shouldn't respond in the petty manner of censoring myself, particularly since I only have two censored comments as evidence with a few other minor comments being accepted. Although I do believe it would have been courteous for Counter Currents to provide a short response to my email requesting their motivation for censoring my first comment, I suppose they presume a level of sophistication in figuring out for yourself what the rules are based on the quality and style of the comments. I haven't seen too many fire-breathing rants published there even though I believe this kind of comment is a natural phase for many pro-Whites to pass through as they discover how false, inverted and evil the racist, anti-White system is.<br /><br />This particular censorship stung because I have great respect for the work of Counter Currents and felt slighted by those I see as comrades in the struggle to help save our people.<br /><br />As I said below Counter Currents has a great comment section. One significant reason is the fairly low level of infestation by Zionist trolls and other operatives following the COINTELPRO playbook of disinformation, demoralization and distraction, unlike Occidental Observer where these scum are common and make sifting for quality comments much more of a chore. Even though sometimes their presence is useful to help train our people to recognize their techniques and arguments, overall they drain the vitality, clarity, focus and synergy from discussions through their constant baiting and distraction.<br /><br />Obviously Counter Current's high quality comment section results from their careful moderation of comments which requires extra effort on their part.<br /><br />Personally I'm a firm supporter in freedom of speech and inquiry but I recognize in the real world, there can be difficulties when those operating in bad faith organize to subvert effective communication between those of good faith.<br /><br />I believe with better software tools and a little human intervention, we could filter out this kind of garbage, but I haven't seen such tools implemented anywhere. I did <a href="http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/snappy_refutations_exercise_6/#c73618">a comment at Majority Rights</a> where I gave a some brief ideas to ease this problem (towards the end).<br /><br /> There can also be a mismatch between comments that add real value to a conversation and those that clutter one up in spite of good intentions. Rants and rah-rah posts that are light on novel contributions can be valuable in building community and camaraderie, but there are different stars in the pro-White firmament catering to these different audiences. My guess is that Counter Currents filters out a lot of these comments to adhere to higher standards.<br /><br />In general I have a rambling, discursive style where I jam in lots of ideas and asides as I discuss a topic. For example, in my later comment (Comment 1), I gave a brief overview of my Silent Diffusion idea and also threw in a few technical tips to help those readers who don't know too much about security. I realize this isn't everyone's cup of tea and I'm going to make an effort this year to improve my writing, including the focus, style and length of my writing. I need to factor these different subjects into their own cohesive posts rather than cobbling together massive chock-a-block kludges.<br /><br />Although I have pretty decent verbal intelligence, the highest reaches of my intelligence are concentrated in mathematical and logical abilities. I'm not really a natural, gifted or fast writer as my natural writing is somewhat stilted and I struggle to revise it into something acceptable.<br /><br />I recognize that both of my posts could have been better and I need to work harder to make better comments. That said, I do believe I raised serious points that the folks at Counter Currents should forthrightly consider instead censoring even if the points might be a little awkward for them.<br /><br />Our educational struggle isn't about making money or entangling ourselves in the talmudic twists of intellectual property law but building a vital foundation for rebuilding the identity, knowledge, spirit, safety, ethnocentrism and nationhood of our beleaguered people.<br /><br /><b>Original Post: February 9, 2011</b><br /><br />Recently I submitted a couple of comments to <a href="http://www.counter-currents.com/">counter-currents</a> that were deleted or censored, depending on your estimation of their value.<br /><br />I'm displaying the comments below ordered by my judgment of "best to worst" which corresponds to most recent to earliest.<br /><br />After the earlier comment was deleted I sent an email to the webmaster asking for their reasons for deleting the comment but they didn't bother to reply. They don't have any guidelines that I've seen. This earlier comment (marked Commment 2 below) is admittedly a polemical but heartfelt rant at the odious hypocritical system that oppresses our people. Perhaps they thought my casual use of far-right slang was too vulgar for their rarefied site. Perhaps the comment was too angry in tone. Perhaps they think my comment just sucks. I don't know. That's why I asked for their reasons which they didn't bother to share.<br /><br />But I believe my more recent comment is a good-faith, non-polemical substantive critique of their short-sighted policy and deserved a hearing.<br /><br />I'm disappointed at their heavy-handed censorship.<br /><br />Either way their actions suggest I'm not welcome at their site so I won't trouble them again.<br /><br />I do recommend the site though as one of the leading intellectual sites of the White Nationalist movement with an excellent mix of new and classic material and a very good comment section.<br /><br /><br /><br /><h4>Comment 1: Later, Better Comment</h4><br />posted on thread <a href="http://www.counter-currents.com/2011/02/now-available-pdf-ebooks-of-our-first-two-titles/">Now Available! PDF E-Books of our First Two Titles</a><br/><br /><i>submitted on February 8, 2011 in early afternoon.</i><br /><br />First, some context from the original post:<br /><blockquote><br />We are pleased to announce that E-book versions of Toward the White Republic and Taking Our Own Side are now available in PDF format.<br /><br />Michael O’Meara<br />Toward the White Republic<br />Price: $10<br /><br />Michael J. Polignano<br />Taking Our Own Side<br />Price: $10<br /><br />We encourage you to share these E-books with friends and relatives; however, we do not want them to be uploaded onto message boards or Bittorrent sites. For this reason, each purchased PDF will be customized with the purchaser’s name, address, and email address, and made available via an encrypted link sent via email once the PayPal transaction is complete. <b>...REST OF POST OMITTED</b><br /></blockquote><br />Here is the comment I submitted:<br /><blockquote><br />I urge you to reconsider this policy.<br /><br />First, it seems self-contradictory to encourage buyers to share e-books with<br />friends and family, yet not expect someone within one of these extended social<br />networks to upload the books. Perhaps a direct friend or family member<br />won't, but a more distant recipient likely will, violating the privacy of the buyer with possible harassment and loss of employment.<br /><br />Second, what if the buyer or one of the friends and family isn't security savvy and their computer is hacked by sophisticated malware or a live hacker. Again, the buyer's privacy may be violated.<br /><br />I'm sure some of your possible buyers will be dissuaded knowing an electronic copy will be marked with their personal data so they must worry about that copy inadvertently ending up on the net.<br /><br />Hint to buyers concerned about privacy: never let the PDF file touch the disk of an internet exposed computer. Immediately take it offline (e.g. save the file directly to a USB stick [in an encrypted volume for extra security]) and use it on an internet isolated computer [more discussion below] and keep it encrypted.<br /><br />Third, why do you want to restrict distribution of your titles? Why not<br />encourage maximum diffusion of your ideas and then encourage sympathetic readers to give donations. You can even instruct them on various ways<br />to do the donations that protect their privacy. For example, people<br />can buy anonymous credit cards with cash for a relatively small fee.<br /><br />By making your materials freely available you can probably reach at least<br />50 or 100 times the audience and at a faster rate. We Whites don't have all the time in the world to deprogram our brainwashed people. You might even do better financially relying on the honor system with a much larger base of readers and perhaps a few patrons will give larger donations to support your open distribution policy.<br /><br />You all should add support for more secure communications, including GPG for secure email and an SSL section on your web site for private communications.<br /><br />Since a powerful and comprehensive anti-White psychological war has been waged against our people for so many decades, an oppressive architecture built into "civil society" to punish "transgressors" and a Big Brother surveillance state silently gathers every scrap of data it can, many Whites are timid about looking at anything taboo. I wrote about a strategy for weakening this called <a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/12/silent-diffusion.html">"Silent Diffusion"</a>.<br /><br />The basic idea is to provide massive, self-contained sets of truth and persuasive materials in a safe way so those too intimidated to visit taboo web sites (with Big Brother taking note) or to purchase taboo books (again, with Big Brother logging activity) can get the information. Some of these people might be embedded in current power structures.<br /><br />"Safe way" refers to creating an internet isolated computer using old machines, e.g. 7+ years, that are perfectly capable of reading offline web pages, pdf files and other documents, playing audio and video. These machines never touch the internet, with data and programs flowing one way from connected systems to the isolated system. The truly cautious can write all input data onto read-only media so there is no possibility of data leakage from the isolated system.<br /><br /> If you only have one computer, there are ways to simulate this process that are much better than leaving everything on a single online system (e.g. disconnect normal hard disk [optional but adds security], boot a customized Live Linux from CD/DVD/USB, use encrypted USB storage for taboo data).<br /><br />Silent diffusion collections (e.g. data DVDs) can be copied and passed from person to person. Cost: $20 DVD burner that pretty much everyone already has and 10 cent rewriteable DVD.<br /><br />This also helps us create interpersonal communication channels in case they lock down the internet. I think the way they might try to lock down the internet would be to target all encrypted traffic they can't read. They will demand back doors into all encrypted traffic so they can read it at their leisure and then legally target anything they can't read or that is taboo. This way they keep the internet for business but suppress the liberty and truth that threatens their reign of Big Lies.<br /><br />Books such as yours would be perfect for silent diffusion collections. Imagine reaching tens of thousands of powerful, high-status Whites that might be sympathetic if only they knew the other side of the story. Not to mention hundreds of thousands or millions of less elite but good White Folks.<br /></blockquote><br /><h4>Comment 2: Earlier, Crappier Comment</h4><br />posted on thread <a href="http://www.counter-currents.com/2011/02/american-renaissance-conference-canceled-second-year-running/">American Renaissance Conference Canceled Second Year Running</a><br/><i>submitted on February 3, 2011 in the early morning.</i><br /><blockquote><br />Getting the vast anti-White system to blatantly expose its vicious anti-White double standards and hatred is vital. But it looks like Jared Taylor and Amren should’ve been better prepared with a backup plan instead of slinking away in defeat two years running.<br /><br />Why can’t they have the backup meeting on some private property, even if it’s only some tents on a field, in the worst case.<br /><br />Whites need to realize that the “colorblind” society is a big f***ing lie, like dozens of other BFLs we live under, including 911 and the Holyhoax. The “colorblind” society that most Kwans fall for, courtesy of Talmudvision, the Indoctrination Industrial Complex and other influences, is code for hateful “anti-White” bigotry and raw Jewish and non-White supremacism.<br /><br />White is the new nigger.<br /><br />We need to become better prepared to inform more people and exploit what’s left of legal and political process, if only as a publicity tool to promote a deep cynicism and alienation from the system that so many patriotards identify with via a carefully constructed lifelong false consciousness (I was one of those unfortunates until the last couple of years).<br /><br />I agree with Sam Davidson who did a great interview last Saturday on The Political Cesspool. We need to withdraw our allegiance to the rotten system that runs this country, including the government. Look at the many manufactured events they stage, including the malicious false prosecution of Edgar Steele. <b>[2/9 NOTE: Actually what they're doing to Ed Steele and his family is MUCH worse than mere false prosecution. The authorities appear guilty of several additional serious crimes.]</b> They may have power now, but it won’t last as millions and then tens of millions of Whites kindle secret flames of righteous fury against their lies, injustice and evil.<br /><br />For example, last year when death threats were being ignored by the Department of Justice [sic] and the MSM, there should have been a series of lawsuits challenging these violations of White Civil Rights. We don’t seem to have the organization and resources to do this now, so we’d better cultivate this ASAP. Even though it would probably be futile legally given the deep corruption of “our” institutions, it might help wake up hundreds of thousands or even millions of Whites and help us create a significant pro-White alternative media.<br /><br />When many Whites start to see an assertive pro-White media and culture production, they will LOVE it and transfer their attention and loyalty. Feedback will ensue, drawing in more talent, wealth and numbers.<br /><br />Every slimy trick the anti-White Jewish Supremacist haters and their lackeys wield to degrade, slander and attack Whites can be inverted in alternative culture or news productions to turn the tables.<br /><br />I happened to see 10 minutes of some Hymiewood action piece-o-crap on TV recently<br />where, in a discongruous story tangent, a Black criminal recounted his molestation by a White camp counselor as a young teenager. All these tens of thousands of incidents of jamming Whitey’s nose in the dog shit can be easily redirected or mimicked. Perhaps we can even create alternative audio tracks that take existing programs and tweak storyline for the desired effect.<br /></blockquote>ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-68064308768968871062010-11-03T16:20:00.001-04:002010-11-03T16:26:33.399-04:00UpdateI'm responding atypicalwhite's recent comment to provide an update for my readers since this blog has been mute for so long.<br /><br />This has been a difficult year for me. I am in a transition period where I want to significantly change what I've been doing. I don't want to be a wage slave working for corporations and the system so I'm trying to follow Kievsky's advice to change my career to be more independent.<br /><br />Also, I've had great difficulty writing and editing my posts. I have lots-and-lots of posts and ideas, but I look at what I've written and consider it to be crap that has a ways to go to be presentable.<br /><br />Part of the problem is a kind of rage where I'm still trying to assimulate all the things I've learned about the true shape of the world and our people, including 911 and many more appalling lies and evils. I'm naturally kinda hot-headed so its tougher for me than more cool-headed folks. So my writing becomes too polemical and bitter. I know I need to focus on being constructive and making a useful contribution, and to do so I need to properly sublimate the anger into something beneficial and positive.<br /><br />I believe there is significant evidence that 911 was a false-flag operation designed to create support for American involvement in Middle Eastern wars for the benefit of Israel and, perhaps, the domestic military-industrial complex (and whatever other actors we need a real investigation to identify).<br /><br />I have a post I'm working on about 911 but I'm trying to tone it down and consider whether my suspicion that 911 might be the key to bringing down the whole rotten system is plausible or ridiculously grandiose.<br /><br />If explosives were used to bring down the three WTC towers as much analysis and investigation suggests, then 911 was the greatest act of treason in American history. That's because it would've been a cold-blooded, premeditated mass murder of Americans that was falsely blamed on Muslims in order to launch wars of aggression that have likely killed millions of innocent victims, squandered TRILLIONS of dollars of American treasure, devastated foreign peoples, their property and societies, and brought many calamities to our people and society, including a deep erosion of our civil liberties. All based on a vicious pack of lies by the true mass murderers. By the way the real mass murderers justified these wars because of the mass murder. So if they've been caught red-handed, by their own logic, we can use their own arguments to punish WHO? HOW?<br /><br />How can a supposedly free and democratic society tolerate even 1/10 of the doubt that we currently have with 911 truth evidence and analysis when all that is asked is for a real investigation? If they have nothing to hide, they should be glad to clear their "good names".<br /><br />Everyone should check out 911 truth, including <a href="http://www.ae911truth.org">Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth</a> and their youtube channel. There have some new videos on the scientific investigations of evidence for controlled demolitions using nano-thermite.<br /><br />I'll save the rest of 911 for my upcoming posts.<br /><br />I'm also going to launch a Tech Talk series where I'll discuss various computer topics that I hope will benefit some folks. I'll discuss topics like why Linux/BSD and Open Source make a lot of sense for White advocates, making an isolated secure computer, some ways to improve your security practices, and ways to retrieve web and video content for offline storage (<a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/12/silent-diffusion.html">and retransmission hopefully</a> instead of only reading it online (sneak peek: two useful utilities: youtube-dl (URL: http://bitbucket.org/rg3/youtube-dl/wiki/Home) and wget (URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/wget/).<br /><br />I'm also trying to break up some of my mega posts like "Alternative Culture" and "Improved Organization" into smaller pieces that will be easier to finish and easier to read. They've spiraled into giant sets of ideas (that would be at least small book length as prose) that I've found difficult to finish because I'm unhappy with the quality of the organization and writing.<br /><br />Look for at least one post within one week.ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-86945260198665581802010-05-25T18:22:00.006-04:002010-05-27T13:07:08.666-04:00Terminology ThoughtsHas anyone coined the word "chutzpocrisy" yet?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=chutzpocrisy">Yup. They have</a>. Although it doesn't seem to be widely used.<br /><br />This term combining "chutzpah" and "hypocrisy" should refer to the outrageous hypocrisy commonly seen among many outspoken anti-White Jews who advocate one thing for themselves and something radically different for the Other. For example, they advocate nation-destroying and genocidal policies for Whites while simultaneously advocating the exact opposite for themselves and their ethnostate of Israel.<br /><br />A recent concrete example is the Jewish conniption fit over Arizona's new anti-illegal-alien law when Israel has always and continues to do far more repressive things to the Palestinians and other aliens in Israel or Israeli-occupied Palestine.<br /><br />Likewise with securing the border with Mexico. How dare we enforce the border or build an effective wall. Yet Israel gets to build an effective wall propped up with tens of billions in American wealth while we get called neo-nazi-racist-hater-bigot-white-supremacists(TM) for daring to advocate the preservation of our nation and people.<br /><br />The list goes on. and on and on. and on some more. and more and more and more.<br /><br />I could keep going but you get the point.<br /><br />Another formulation I like is ORCS for "Our" Repressive "Civil" Society.<br /><br />This would replace a fixture in my previous posts, the accurate but tediously long: "Our" "Civil" Society.<br /><br />I quote "Our" ironically because it definitely isn't ours. Instead it is dominated by a hostile, alien Jewish supremacist elite; corrupt, soulless, shabbos goy White traitors; antagonistic Blacks; imported foreign tools and naive White true believers suckered by the long occult war [thanks Kievsky!] against Whites suffusing most corners of our society and culture.<br /><br />Likewise "Civil Society" has fully earned its contemptous quotes, since it seethes with malevolent incivility. The greasy lie of "civility" is a total fraud, a ploy to gull the lifelong brainwashed into believing that this vicious, oppressive, lying, anti-White, non-White-supremacist totalitarian system is actually concerned with civility or its ostensible aims.<br /><br />I always contemptuously laugh when the anti-White power structure trowels out rhetorical slop like "hurtful", "creating a safe space", "dialogue" and "opposing hate". Somehow the lofty rhetoric applies to EVERYONE BUT WHITES. Plenty of "hurtful" things are said constantly within and by ORCS about Whites and that's definitely a feature, not a bug!<br /><br />"Creating a Safe Space" is a <a href="http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Connelly-Colleges.html">total fraud since the literal rape and murder of Whites is frantically ignored and covered up</a>. The recent murders of Whites at Kent State are but one example.<br /><br />The true purpose of "Creating a Safe Space" and the other cultural Marxist shibboleths is the destruction of freedom of speech and inquiry by banning speech, thoughts or activism that threaten the current Jewish-and-non-White-supremacist hegemonic system.<br /><br />As usual in the Kwa, racist anti-White double standards actually rule. Whites are subjected to an Orwellian narrative about "White privilege", "White power", "White racism", "White supremacism" with the delusional pretense that this hateful attack on Whites, their identity, history and peoplehood is "speaking truth to power".<br /><br />Yeah, right. Whites are SOOOOO powerful that NOT ONE politician, dean, "civic leader" or power broker is openly pro-White. Instead nearly every one of them parrots diversity blather and "white guilt" under the steel gaze of our commissariat. Those straying too far from the party line suffer consequences including job loss, ostracism and public humiliation.<br /><br />This intellectually dishonest, barbaric treatment starts far before any traces of actual pro-White advocacy. To question any of the patently false dogma ruling the Kwa invites swift and terrible punishment as Nobel Prize winner James Watson and many others discovered.<br /><br />In actuality, the power structure of the Kwa enforces the privilege, power, racism and supremacism of Jews and non-Whites over Whites.<br /><br />This power desperately needs a LOT of truth spoken to it.<br /><br />Turn On, Tune In, Drive Out [the ORCS!]<br /><br /><p style="font-size: 80%; font-family: Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-style: italic">Updated Thursday, May 27, 2010.<ul><li style="font-size: 80%; font-family: Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-style: italic">Tweaked a few awkward phrasings.</li><li style="font-size: 80%; font-family: Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-style: italic">Added a few sentences.</li></ul></p>ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-90073495024524347202009-12-21T02:30:00.000-05:002009-12-21T02:33:58.406-05:00Silent DiffusionGiven the institutionalized anti-White antipathy and bias of "our" "civil society" and the closely related ZOG (AKA the system), we are not duty or honor bound to sacrifice our personal, group, descendants' or ancestors' interests by recklessly upholding a traditional White idealistic sense of honor, honesty and fair play. Doing so would allow anti-White haters who fight dirty to twist our virtues against us for base and genocidal ends. Our honor should be reserved for our people and given only to those treating us with honor. Those treating us in good faith and honor should receive the same from us, including Blacks and Jews.<br /><br />For example, right now many instititions including the military, deliberately weed out pro-White activists while allowing non-White activists, supremacists and gang members including some Jewish supremacists with their primary loyalty to other Jews and Israel instead of "America". If the system is rigged against us, it has no legitimacy and we have no obligation to weaken ourselves by scrupulously giving honesty to a dishonorable and dishonest system.<br /><br /><h3>We Need Lots-O-Infiltrators!</h3><br />We need many pro-Whites embedded within existing institutions to gather intelligence, leak evil or embarrassing data, oppose or undermine anti-White actions and policies, sow discord among our enemies and so on. Some of them are already in place but aren't yet pro-White, while others will infiltrate in the future. Many of these Whites may need to keep quiet or even directly lie about their pro-White commitment. This would not be dishonorable. This country was created by our forefathers for their posterity and has been hijacked by an evil anti-White system undeserving of our support unless it abandons its anti-White oppression and stops promoting long-term White genocide. A small set of key infiltrators in the right institutions, both public and private, could expose tremendous amounts of malevolent anti-White scheming and action by the system as well as lots of highly embarrassing dirt, corruption and abuses of power.<br /><br />Just imagine all the anti-White directives and work products used in the advertising industry, mainstream media and Hollywood. I suspect audio recordings of some of their meetings would be highly revealing to the sheeple, kinda like the denouement of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Face_in_the_Crowd_(film)">A Face In The Crowd (1957)</a>, an excellent anti-White, Jewish supremacist classic deserving close study directed by Elia Kazan, starring Andy Griffith and with writing and screenwriter credits by Jewish Commie Budd Schulberg (I won't give away the ending because it's a major spoiler. Watch it if you haven't seen it. I have little doubt it is in complete accord with how our elites view the rest of us).<br /><br /><h3>New Leaders and Crypto Pro-Whites</h3><br />We need genuinely talented leaders who arise without any significant baggage or taint. I mean no disrespect meant to our early vanguard leaders who had difficult task of challenging the system when most of us were thoroughly brainwashed, especially before the internet broke the media monopoly.<br /><br />Some pro-Whites must decide early on to keep their commitment hidden so they can best serve our interests. This is a perfectly honorable choice until we've reclaimed our legitimate rights and reversed anti-White oppression.<br /><br /><h3>Most of Us are Probably Tagged Already</h3><br />Unfortunately I suspect almost everybody currently in the pro-White movement, even passively as an internet reader, has probably already been tagged by ZOG given the extensive domestic surveillance system unless they've taken extraordinary efforts to mask their online identity, like never using their home internet connection for anything WNA-related, using a portable device to hook into randomly varying public internet access with care taken not to be caught on video surveillance, shielding the device while not in use, possibly combined with using an encrytped proxy (which ones are trustworthy?), and working at home on a 100% internet-isolated computer that encrypts all sensitive data, etc. I doubt more than 0.1% of WNAs (White Nationalists and Advocates) have done this kind of scrupulously careful security protocol. Most of us are way too lazy for that. Even worse, as we began our movement into White Nationalism and Advocacy, we left a telltale traceable internet-trail moving to pro-White, anti-Jewish-supremacist knowledge that will likely be data mineable by ZOG. Even entities without ZOG's full power are probably using many of the internet tracking services like gravatar and statcounter to piece together browsing patterns by correlating timestamped IP data from many of these sources to build up a surprisingly detailed collection of browsing habits. Some entities probably have staff infiltrated into various important companies that give them privileged access to what should technically be private records, like your ISP. I suspect the power is rarely used overtly so they don't tip off the rubes on how little privacy there really is on the internet. This is my speculation, not certain knowledge.<br /><br />I kinda like this WNA acronym, pronounced "WIN-uh", like winner with a Southern accent. It's also resembles "DNA" suggesting the biological foundation of racial differences instead of the fraud of supposed White oppression of non-Whites. It can also be pronounced "WHY-nuh', like whiner, but I also believe this works to our advantage because it exposes our enemies contempt for our people and their legitimate rights by belittling our just complaints for anyone that values objectivity and fairness.<br /><br />For those publishing text on the internet, care would have to be taken to use stock language that diverges from your normal idioms and other discernable patterns that will likely be data mined and correlated with known communications, possibly including voice communications that are mass-intercepted, automatically translated and available for analysis and correlation. Technology is enabling a nightmarish police state with staggering power. Many groups beyond pro-Whites are also opposed to this emerging tyranny and we should join with them to reduce trust and legitimacy for this deeply un-American police state being foisted upon us through false-flag terror and manipulation. The only way to reduce the power of this illegitimate tyranny is to create significant mass dissent among the public, elites and employees within the police state and its supporting institutions. We must stop believing the constant little lies and falling for the big lies.<br /><br /><h3>We Need a Safe Way to Spread our Message and Knowledge</h3><br />So we need lots more pro-Whites and we need some to be untrackable. Also, given the oppressive political correctness and corporate neo-serfdom that effectively weakens or destroys free-speech rights for many folks, we need a way to spread our message convincingly without these cautious folks feeling like they're risking their livelihood or family's security.<br /><br />One approach to do this is what can be called <i>silent diffusion</i>.<br /><br />The basic idea is we provide large sets of high-quality, pro-White works in various media that can be spread around hand-to-hand in trusted personal networks (and electronically as well) so that the recipients can have a fairly self-contained set of material, including quick, high-level overviews, detailed supporting documentation for those so inclined and a full-range of related materials so that the viewer or reader can spend months digging through our arguments, proof, humor, videos, audios, etc, including looking at conflicting arguments without ever having to touch the internet and get labelled. There can be different subscriptions aimed at different audiences, e.g. working class versus professional, average college graduates, intellectuals, women, children, and there may even be some segmentation for different White subcultures, generations, etc. Given that CD-ROMs and DVD-drives are so pervasive and that these media hold huge amounts of data, it really wouldn't take too many releases to include lots of good videos, audio, books, articles, etc. Different audiences may all be accommodated through choosing a the desired initial view of the same disk. DVDs can fit over 4 GB which can fit hundreds of books, thousands of articles with plenty of room for lots of audio and good quality video.<br /><br />These packages can also be spread to strangers, left at public places, sent to various important audiences and elites. For example, the guy who created the extremely thought-provoking Holocaust Revisionist film <a href="http://www.holocaustdenialvideos.com/">One Third of the Holocaust</a> and some others, has a page where he urges his readers to independently help spread his careful analysis that casts doubt on various specific aspects of the orthodox Holocaust narrative to various elites like 100 history professors. We can adapt this idea of marketing our ideas to prospects like non-ideologue teachers, small businessmen, patriotards, libertarians, mainstream Christians, Christian Zionists, etc. Some of these different audiences might have specially constructed materials to gracefully address their typical exising brainwashing.<br /><br />Creating a DVD and a page or two of introduction with a quick description of how to set of an internet-isolated computer might persuade a timid White to broach a taboo they are otherwise fearful to confront. Creating and distributing these items is fairly inexpensive and can be done by independent individuals as well as groups. We need lots of independent cells and individuals as well as increasing organized and linked groups.<br /><br />Another benefit of Silent Diffusion Distributions is their ability to spread underground communications if they manage to shutdown the internet. We can create new communication channels off their radars.<br /><br /><h3>An Aside about Holocaust Revisionism</h3><br />By the way, every WNA should investigate Holocaust Revisionism because there is a strong possiblity that significant elements of the Holocaust orthodoxy are false or exaggerated. I realize this is a controversial topic and some public WNAs like Kevin MacDonald might avoid this topic to avoid undermining his important contributions from further vilification by our shitty oppressive society (SOS). Fair enough. We need to allow broad cooperation without petty sniping since we are so marginalized by "our" evil "civil society". But in our hearts and minds we should strive for the truth even if our corrupt society is dominated by Big Lies and holds the truth in contempt.<br /><br />Jews are only entitled to the truth. Nothing more and nothing less.<br /><br />If they are being significantly dishonest about several major claims of the Holocaust it is, by far, the greatest slander and "blood libel" in history. Their constant efforts to destroy freedom of speech and inquiry by imprisioning Holocaust Revisionists strongly implies they can't honestly confront the many calm, detailed arguments of the Revisionists so they choose to shut down the normal approach to examining historical events through free and open inquiry.<br /><br />Their major goal is to intimidate most people, especially our intellectual elites, from considering any challenge to the orthodoxy by showing the severe punishment dissenters receive.<br /><br />I believe any strong attempt to stifle and stigmatize debate or dissent should act as a powerful marker that a Big Lie may be operating, which means the subject needs careful, open scrutiny. 911 is another probable Big Lie that all WNAs should investigate. It's especially important because if there are entities engaging in false-flag operations, they will likely continue doing them, probably escalating them to horrific proportions to dazzle the masses with fear to consolidate their power and control by completing a full-blown tyrannical police state. These topics would be perfect for Silent Diffusion Distributions since they are so taboo.<br /><br /><h3>Different Subscriptions for Different Starting Points</h3><br />Distinct subscriptions can target different degrees of initial brainwashing so we bring along newbies gently with maybe one or two additional tiers to get the full ugly truth. Newbies need to deeply understand the massive internal contradictions and hypocrisies of the system and how it isn't the fair, idealistic system it pretends to be. Step two will be to begin better understanding the ugly truth and how it got that way.<br /><br /><h3>Using Our Time More Efficiently</h3><br /><br />One problem with reading the raw material of WNA daily or weekly is the significant effort of sifting through lots of redundancy, venting, disinformation or COINTELPRO subversion to find the novel (for the reader) rare jewels and more common solid gems. One challenge is that many good insights already exist in many sources that most of us aren't familiar with. This is why our movement needs more mediation and organization to create efficient collections of the best thought without forcing the user to read hundreds of full-length books and tens of thousands of articles and blog posts. We have relatively little available collective time, ability and wealth resources, so we don't need everyone trying to read a lot of relatively abstruse academic articles when a mediator can provide a reader's digest summary for a general audience if needed. Those extra five, ten or twenty hours per week for thousands of potential activists and contributers can be better spent on other pragmatic tasks that advance our movement.<br /><br /><h3>Our Highest Priority: Education and Persuasion to Increase our Movement</h3><br />Probably the single most important activity at this phase of our movement is the dissemination of our educational and persuasive works to increase the size and influence of our movement. As it expands it will pull more resources and energy into the movement which will provide more rapid growth through positive feedback. This is the core of our changing the culture.<br /><br />Some effort should also be dedicated to filling out and debating various aspects of WNA ideologies and doctrines, although as one Occidental Commenter (? Svigor) noted in the recent past, there is no reason we must decide everything up front. We can defer some of the details to future context and situations. We don't need to create a doctrinaire, rigid ideology.<br /><br />Let me be clear. These abstruse academic articles are usually great stuff for their niche. We need to have a few experts and laymen covering every major topic, but they also need to fit it into an overall general context and mediate it for the wider non-specialist elite audience and possibly a general audience because for most of our activists, those extra ten, twenty or thirty minutes per person multiplied by five, ten or twenty articles per week multiplied by thousands or tens of thousands of activists would be better spent specializing on other activities. Unlike the anti-White mediators of the MSM and Hollywood, I have a much greater trust in WNA mediators. There is a lot of redundancy across various commentary and news sites. By creating a somewhat unified and organized collection we can dramatically increase learning efficiency. We can also create archives of news stories, outrages, etc, organized by category, time, author, etc and powerfully searchable and viewable using standard tools or custom software we adapt or create. This way people can catch up on news at their leisure and systematize their knowledge of key details and issues.<br /><br />Hopefully we'll spark more synergy and cooperation and greater mastery of the ever expanding, organized, "official" WNA body of knowledge.<br /><br />For these special distributions, we would gather all the best stuff, refine it and package it to be more efficient for various audiences to use most profitably. Although comment sections at blogs can be fantastic resources, they can chew up a lot of time because of the lower than optimal signal-to-noise ratio. Certain annoying commenters are almost certainly anti-White infiltrators trying to undermine effective pro-Whites through disinformation, subversion and demoralization.<br /><br />By using some improved software tools, databases, etc, we can extract the gems into a concise, high-octane collection of our best stuff. Many Whites are busy people who need this info highly distilled and packaged in the most accessible, persuasive format.<br /><br />We could instruct people how to set up a safe internet-isolated computer and use encryption, so they can accumulate a collection of taboo data with much lower risk. Then periodically we can put out new releases. We would use signing tools using private keys and published checksums so recipients would know that the distributions are authentic.<br /><br /><h3>Networks of Hidden Readers</h3><br />The goal is for a relatively smaller number of exposed people to pass distributions around to several hidden readers each, with some of these hidden readers repeating the process to other hidden readers.<br /><br /><h3>Ideas for a Safe Internet-Isolated Computer</h3><br />To create a safe internet-isolated computer an old 3-6 year old machine running Linux or an old Windows is perfectly adequate. New stuff can be installed by using a USB drive or CD/DVD. Basically never directly plug it into the internet. Ever. Make sure it doesn't have wireless networking hardware or at least disable it. I recommend Linux or a BSD Unix. They're free and open-source so you don't have to fiddle with Microshit's licenses, activation or crapware. Linux and BSD are free with lots of good, free, open-source apps, including multimedia, office and graphics, and some of the distributions have gotten much easier to use for Windows users, like Ubuntu (if you can avoid barfing when you see the race mixing picture on their website).<br /><br />This is a starting point. We'd want to get the input from a bunch of folks and look for weak points and add more detail. A lot of the details can probably be gotten from existing non-racial tech sites.<br /><br /><h3>Creating a Mass Movement</h3><br />One goal is to create a much larger audience receptive and knowledgeable of our ideas, arguments, facts and media products to create mass to overturn the anti-White oppression currently dominating "our" "civil society". As we persuade a mass audience we can bring more resources into WNA including volunteerism, subscriptions, donations, estate gifts and the presence of our masses, elites, winners and those embedded in the system.<br /><br />The work of creating this kind of professional, distilled distribution of the best of WNA is the sort constructive effort we could collaborate on over the internet to begin changing the culture to a more just one. I'd rather spend more time doing concrete, constructive activities rather than reading an excess of relatively theoretical or technical works or articles. Those works certainly have their place but I think some are best as a niche that we just need a few scholars and lay experts tussling with, who can then distill the important points down to the non-experts or masses.<br /><br />I'm planning to discuss this need for greater organization, collaboration and practical efforts in my next post. In general we need to take WNA to the next level where we are busy doing lots of constructive activities where we specialize and coordinate our efforts intelligently, so that we can achieve many concrete goals in parallel while efficiently using our resources.<br /><br />As we build up our alternative media and culture production and create a mass audience of hundreds of thousands and then millions and beyond, gaining knowledge, commitment and support of WNA, it will be much easier for this information to be widely distributed with less traceability. We can bring down overt anti-White oppression because Whites will start proudly telling the anti-Whites to fuck off because they're the real racists.<br /><br />We must become the change we desire.<br /><br />Thanks anti-White leftists. Great line! Will do!ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-9479692596600183242009-11-19T10:40:00.000-05:002009-11-19T10:40:12.438-05:00The Existing "Leadership" of Whites is Inauthentic and IllegitimateThe current "leadership" of Whites in "our" "civil society" is illegitimate and inauthentic. They've been turned against their own people and heritage through the inculcation of an anti-White false consciousness.<br /><br />This "leadership" is not explicitly White because it is taboo for Whites to EVER specifically advocate for White interests. This is just one of the many double standards where Whites are held to different and "higher" standards than EVERY other group: Whites are supposed to be post-racial and put other groups' interests above their own. In fact they can't even publically discuss having interests without being smeared as "White supremacists". The only allowable public discourse by Whites as Whites is degrading self-abasement. We're not even supposed to THINK about having interests as Whites. Instead we're supposed to be patriotard "Americans" who care about what's good for "America", even as <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Amerikwa">Amerikwa</a> morphs into an alien Orwellian totalitarianism that despises our people, culture and heritage. Naturally none of these post-racial rules apply to all the cherished non-Whites who can aggressively and openly pursue their group interests with the full support and encouragement of "our" "civil society" which "celebrates" them, unlike Whites, who are officially reviled. Non-Whites are also gaining individual rights superior to Whites, as affirmative action and hate crime laws illustrate.<br /><br />The US is literally a non-White supremacist system and if we dare speak out against this injustice or our very deliberately planned dispossession, we are slandered as "White supremacists".<br /><br />Our "leadership" isn't even implicitly White because that implies they would be at least slightly pro-White, if only unconsciously or tacitly due to the oppressive anti-White control system dominating Amerikwa. Sadly, "our" "leadership" is actually anti-White, both implicitly and explicity. It is <i>de rigueur</i> for White "leaders" to extravagently rhapsodize on multiculturalism, racial inclusiveness and diversity while deliberately ignoring, belittling or condemning their Whiteness. Such White elites are inauthentic because they are brainwashed with an anti-White ideology that they continually kowtow to, glorify and strengthen instead of resisting or subverting. Therefore, they have no authority or legitimacy as White leaders. One of our most important goals must be to <a href="http://vdare.com/macdonald/081125_ethnocentrism.htm">reclaim our voices and interests as Whites</a> and spread awareness that Whites infected with anti-White false consciousness are unworthy frauds undeserving of respect, trust or the delegation of power by our people. They are White Uncle Toms and Judas goats.<br /><br />Admittedly, some of these leaders, like most Whites, are in a difficult position, because the system severly punishes pro-White rhetoric or action. Hopefully as we begin transforming the culture through creating alternative institutions that gain credibility, some of the currently intimidated leadership will find their White voices, accelerating the legitimate reclaiming of our interests and share of power.<br /><br />Our non-crypto alternative institutions must continually expose the anti-White agenda of our current institutions and "leadership" class and strive to erode their legitimacy of the system and its "leaders".<br /><br />As two very insightful pro-White thinkers, <a href="http://age-of-treason.blogspot.com/">Tanstaafl</a> and Fred Scrooby, who comments frequently at <a href="http://www.occidentaldissent.com/">Occidental Dissent</a> and <a href="http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/">Majority Rights</a>, have explained very clearly and convincingly, these people actually support White genocide: they think Whites have no right to exist in the future and look forward to the day when Whites are mixed away into irreversible racial oblivion. Their desires and policies are literally genocidal.<br /><br />Whites can be logically consistent and morally upright by supporting the self-determination and survival of both ourselves and other groups. We should build friendly alliances with any willing allies, including non-Whites, to oppose the globalist juggernaut that threatens most nations and peoples worldwide, including ourselves. We should propose healthy, mutually beneficial, non-exploitative relationships between nations and peoples. Just because we're pro-White doesn't mean we're anti-non-White. There are many potential allies who are sick of the corrosive effects of forced globalism and imperialism. Just like multiculturalism, there can be a good globalism, but it would be quite different than the reigning system of meddling, manipulation, coercision, exploitation and violence. For reference, a good multiculturalism respects the automony of different peoples and encourages mutually beneficial, respectful and voluntary interaction to whatever degree each nation desires.<br /><br />We should also look for allies within Amerikwa disenchanted with the current system and who desire change. This includes secessionists, libertarians, non-White nationalists, anti-imperialists, anti-globalists, anarchists, etc. Realistically, Amerikwa is too far gone for Whites to recover our historic White nation throughout the entire US, but if we can get some decent fraction for ourselves and our posterity that would be much better than what is planned for us, namely effective racial genocide, the continued campaign of anti-White demonization, the theft of White wealth and productivity, and kulak-like scapegoating for any failure to achieve post-racial Utopia, which is absolutely certain to occur because its equality ideology is based on lies that violate the laws of nature, accompanied by persecution and probably mass executions, among many other attacks and injustices against Whites.<br /><br />An important factor in the perversion of White "leadership" has been the undeserved "White guilt" gradually imposed on most Whites and their trusted institutions for at least the last seventy years. This ridiculously overplayed scam springs from many sources, including some mostly internal Whites sources like 1) innate White character and thought processes where we try to be fair and open-minded about some historical excesses against other groups, 2) aspects of Christianity enabling its current transformation to promoting multicultural and White guilt shibboleths, and 3) White radicalism in various guises, like the Transcendentalists. But probably the greatest single factor has been the long-running campaign of anti-White subversion orchestrated by various powerful Jewish sources, including organizations and movements having their minions positioned within many power structures, both formal and informal. We need to destroy the hold of "White guilt" over most Whites through concrete projects and actions.<br /><br />We also need to change White culture so Whites stop caring so much whether other groups "like" them or not or whether Whites are being "fair enough" to non-Whites. Alternative churches need to arise that reject modern mainstream Christianity with its promotion of White guilt and groveling while traditional anti-White churches need to lose many members and much wealth when they push their anti-White agenda.<br /><br />The left and the cultural Marxists have given us a powerful set of tools to critique their own illegitimate power over Whites. Basically all of their ideas and rhetoric can be slightly tweaked and applied right back at them: power, supremacism, bigotry, privilege, authenticity, colonialism, identity, false consciousness, etc, etc, etc. At least it will work for most Whites who still believe in facts, logic, truth, objectivity and fairness, like many Whites do.<br /><br />The main reason the anti-White multicultural left befuddles so many Whites is the long-running delusional "reality" constructed by Hollywood and the mainstream media combined with their lock over other critical institutions of influence. As people see the products of alternate institutions that accurately reflect reality and directly confront many taboos, the anti-Whites seemingly iron grip will soften and crumble like sand.<br /><br />As a brief example, they like to claim that Whites are supposedly all-powerful and frequently oppress non-Whites. A close examination of this claim will reveal its nearly complete fallaciousness and duplicity. Many grim examples of White murders, rape, dishonest one-sided anti-White media, exploitation, inability to advocate for their own interests, persecution when merely advocating for their survival, constant demonization by "our" "civil society" among many other concrete examples will prove the evil Orwellian inversion of this allegation.<br /><br />So true reality is radically different for those who don't harbor a burning hatred of Whites. This was the barest of high-level overviews of a response. We need to create many forms of rebuttal and dissent to their lies and propaganda which I'll discuss in more detail in my next post.<br /><br />The goal of Whites should be to divorce themselves from this evil, anti-White system so we can pursue our own self-determination without bothering or being bothered by other peoples, especially anti-White haters. Any attempt to deny Whites any privileges granted to others is non-White supremacism: i.e. supremacism by non-Whites directed against Whites. One big lie they've succeeded in foisting on most Americans is that anyone merely concerned with White survival or advocacy is White supremacist, which is deeply dishonest, non-White supremacist and genocidal. White supremacism has been demonized thousands of times by Hollywood and the media as retrograde, psychotic, evil, fascist, nazi, ku klux klan, redneck, moronic, perverted and pretty much every other epithet under the sun. So when they slander someone with this usually false label that they've invested tremendous resources into constructing and propagandizing, they aim to shut down rational thought by provoking fear of taboo transgression and punishment, revulsion, discomfort, contempt and hatred, among many other negative and taboo markers associated with "White supremacism".<br /><br />It's time to deconstruct the entire anti-White ediface. Let a thousand venus flytraps bloom!<br /><br />It is 100% against White interests to have ALL of our homelands flooded with non-Whites until we become persecuted minorities in our own, former homes. Any system that pushes this policy on our people is illegitimate and immoral. There's a remote chance that the existing systems in our countries can be changed from their anti-White genocidal course through reforming the system, which we should attempt while concurrently preparing for other contingencies since the future is uncertain.<br /><br />We have an excellent role model in the Jewish community which has literally thousands of organizations pursuing their interersts, including long-term strategic planning and Jewish genetic survival. Anything Jews or any other group are allowed or encouraged to do is also perfectly acceptable for Whites. To believe otherwise is a form of non-White supremacy treating Whites as second-class citizens or subhumans. The mindlessly accepted anti-White racism must be challenged. Since this pervasive anti-White racism is part of an extensive campaign waged using all the levers of power in our society, its creation and maintenance have been a carefully constructed "labor of hate"; its architects and functionaries were anything but mindless themselves. We must do many concrete tasks to begin changing this and fully assert our interests without guilt, shame or submissiveness.<br /><br />I have hope that a good fraction of our own status-conscious elites, especially the younger ones, currently brainwashed into feelings of White guilt or subservience can be jolted out of this inauthentic, false consciousness by confronting them with the severe contradictions of the current anti-White ideology and inducing feelings of low status and inferiority by their being duped by this ridiculously illogical and unethical farrago of anti-White hatred and false history. We need to mess with their status obsessions by pulling the rug out of their pseudo-superiority. They're a bunch of dumbfucks for falling for such obvious scam!<br /><br />In truth, it's easy to fall for the brainwashing, given the coordinated propaganda campaign emanating from the commanding heights of our society. By further building and popularizing our neutral and pro-White institutions, particularly the cultural, media, educational and organizational ones, more people will awaken from the Orwellian nightmare of Amerikwa. It won't be so easy to fall for the scam when there are thousands of cultural and media products that expose it from hundreds of different angles and millions of people are discussing the anti-White matrix.<br /><br />As the consequences of the inept and corrupt "leadership" of "our" country over the last several decades finally arrive with the de facto destruction of the dollar, unwinnable, unending imperialist wars of aggression, the loss of our much of our industrial base, dwindling native ownership of American assets, greater domestic chaos and violence with fewer safe havens, the impoverishment of our working and middle class while "coincidentally" the wealthy, globalist elites loot the American taxpayer, among many other disasters, many more Whites will be searching for answers for their miserable situations and shattered faith. We must provide detailed, accurate and persuasive answers and workable solutions. Giving more power to the rotten, corrupt system and its puppetmasters most responsible for getting us into this mess is NOT the solution! They had their thousands of chances and they continually chose corruption, exploitation, lies, short-sightedness, stupidity and malevolent anti-White aggression. All the hell and despoiling this country has and will go through will have been completely avoidable. The current system and its promoters must be completely and deservedly discredited.<br /><br />America was lulled into a stupor over sixty years ago and has been replaced by an alien body snatcher that superficially resembles traditional America but inwardly embodies an Orwellian inversion of its traditional values, beliefs, culture, law, institutions and people. The Stars and Stripes might as well be a Hammer and Sickle with a Star of David for what its now represents in ideology and behavior.<br /><br />We must gain a deep understanding of how America, and the West in general, and their respective institutions were perverted so thoroughly against their own people, since we want to create new robust systems resistant to such corruption over the long term. This is one of thousands of concrete projects that Whites must pursue thoughtfully through improved coordination and organization which I plan to discuss next.<br /><br />The era of White kowtowing and endless apologies is coming to a close within a few decades. Whites must put their own interests first, just like everyone else. "White guilt" is just a cynical scam designed to bleed, manipulate and scapegoat Whites. It was a great con while it lasted but its practitioners better start planning for a new line of work. Those unsalvageable Whites committed to White degradation can pursue their madness in multicultural cesspools without the rest of us and with the recognition by authentic and healthy Whites that they are spiritually and psychologically deformed trolls utterly unfit to lead or speak for Whites. They and their perverted institutions can wither as authentic Whites withdraw their consent, support and presence. They may have varying motives: outright corruption, self-hatred or naivete. It doesn't matter. What does matter is they have absolutely no moral authority or authenticity. Not one shred. They will be relics of an era of malevolent manipulation against Whites that must be well-understood and guarded against in the future.ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-69035109976551289822009-09-04T19:35:00.003-04:002009-09-04T23:57:34.513-04:00Black365 and Non-White Supremacism<a href="http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/jamesedwards/">James Edwards</a> had <a href="http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/jamesedwards/2009/08/21/365-more-reasons-not-to-eat-at-mcdonalds/">a piece recently about McDonalds and their promotion of a program and web site named black365 "celebrating Black culture ...".</a><br /><br />McDonalds pioneered multicultural advertising decades ago, particularly supporting a strong pro-Black identity. We should start a new healthy restaurant chain called <a href="http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/">MacDonalds</a> catering to Whites. The golden arches could be replaced by a big White W. :)<br /><br />I fully agree with James Edwards' point about the massive double standards employed by multinational corporations and other institutions that promote non-White identity while NEVER doing the same for Whites. About the only time corporations or advertisers explicitly mention White identity is to mock or subvert it, e.g. Whites can't dance or Whites are uptight.<br /><br />Far more common is the implicit treatment of Whites through subtexts which serves three major functions. First, they constantly denigrate White identity, history, culture, attitudes, character and peoplehood, unlike non-White groups, which are respected and shown positively (the only exception being Arabs and Muslims who are sometimes demonized: guess why?). The goal is clearly to destroy any explicitly White group identity and self-esteem. Second, they illustrate "proper" thinking and behavior to define the bounds of accepted White identity. Whites not accepting their assigned safe and submissive role are shown as evil and contemptible (nazis, klansmen, haters, militia "nuts", etc). Everyone gets the message, if only subconsciously. Third, they train non-Whites, including recent immigrants, to see Whites as a hated class to be attacked and displaced in the future.<br /><br />The only accepted "traditional" White identity is to be a patriotard tool of warmongering Zionists and globalists who push other people around in their own countries because the whole world really, really wants to be like America! Support "democracy"!!!<br /><br />These subtexts are literally millions of subtle cues embedded throughout the totality of "our" cultural and entertainment programming. Even though no one sees all or even most of the full set of programming, the average person grows up seeing at least tens of thousands of these anti-White subtexts in thousands of different programs. They become signficant because instead of being randomly distributed in a balanced way, they are systematically biased against Whites. Just watch TV on a typical night and you'll see dozens of examples.<br /><br />The anti-White bias is obvious by comparing the corresponding treatment of non-Whites and Jews (Jews are exquisitely sensitive to the slightest of slights) using the "identity interchange" test. If the commonly accepted anti-White subtexts had the identities exchanged with a non-White, the non-White advocates would be livid with rage at the racist propaganda being spread about their people! It's great for Whites though!<br /><br />Ultimately they want to program Whites (and non-Whites) to behave as servants to their agendas. Our children are cut off from the brilliant accomplishments of their ancestors and the heights and nobility of a healthy White culture and society. Instead they're encouraged to be docile little consumers buying corporate junk manufactured overseas from corporate retail zones next to corporate-built suburbs mostly built with cheap illegal alien labor. These suburbs are meant to be a tacit place of safety using wealth as a barrier instead of ethnocentrism, until the next round of immigration and Black criminal subclass resettlement starts the process over again, leading to fat profits for the controllers managing the process.<br /><br />Isn't modern America such a wonderful land of opportunity? Our founding fathers would be so proud!<br /><br />These constant media images of Whites are a crucial pillar in creating and enforcing anti-White double standards in our "civil society". The news, entertainment and advertising propaganda machines wield massive influence over most sectors of our society including a significant fraction of our intellectual elites.<br /><br />One current repulsive example of White-demeaning advertisting is this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZzXYVHJ2QM">AT&T commercial</a> where a gay-seeming White guy apparently lives in a big house in a suburban neighborhood surrounded by a carefully chosen multicultural crew consisting of a normal Asian man and three children: a Latino boy and White girl who are silent, and an Asian girl, the center and leader of the children. The Asian girl plays the role of a ghetto-speaking Black woman from a soap opera because the gay White guy has asked the neighborhood kids to help him "catch up on his soaps" because he's already apparently recording two other shows during the airtime of the soaps.<br /><br />This is the ideal White man according to our cultural programmers: one who won't reproduce, will happily acquiesce in his people's displacement (and isn't even aware he's part of a people other than "American"), is happily multiculturalist, lives a hedonistic lifestyle, is practically a women (and won't be hunting, fishing, owning guns or have any survival skills) and enthusiastically submits to brainwashing by our elite masters.<br /><br />Why do we give our money to these anti-White corporations?<br /><br />Isn't it great that Whites have such a great sense of humor that they're OK with being constantly ridiculed unlike all the other groups that demand respect?<br /><br />No it's not. It's because Whites are cowed into submission by an evil, anti-White, uncivil society that despises them but that controls most levers of power and uses them aggressively to oppress Whites, attacks their identity, legally steals their wealth and transfers it to non-White colonizers, ungrateful Blacks or various corrupt forces, and then tars any White dissenters and resisters as "racists", "bigots", "fascists", "neo-nazis" and "white supremacists".<br /><br />Ultimately, it's perfectly reasonable that Jews, Blacks and others feel racial solidarity and behave ethnocentrically and even that powerful organizations pander to them.<br /><br />What's NOT OK is that Whites engaging in logically equivalent beliefs and activism are falsely smeared as Nazis, Klansmen or White supremacists by non-White supremacists, especially by powerful and wealthy Jewish and crypto-Jewish organizations and their toadies throughout our "civil society", including the government, corporations, advertising, Hollywood, the MSM and the educational industrial complex. And for almost everyone in the US the propaganda machine has reinforced THOUSANDS of times that those labels represent the worst possible evil.<br /><br />Whites must stop tolerating these double standards against us and only us. We need to make it crystal clear that anything but full acceptance of White advocacy and ethnocentrism while all others are both tolerated and encouraged is NON-WHITE SUPREMACISM. I googled this term a while back and found a few scattered references to it so this is an existing but rare concept. It deserves to become just as mainstream as "white supremacism".<br /><br />We must start calling things by their true names instead of participating in the swarm of lies and obfuscations that enable the anti-White Matrix to pass itself off as a colorblind society that is supposedly just.<br /><br />Colorblind is a con.<br /><br />America is anti-White and non-white supremacist.<br /><br />Try these on for size: Black supremacism, Jewish supremacism, Hispanic Supremacism, Asian supremacism. When non-White advocates believe they have more rights than Whites they are SUPREMACISTS. They need to start hearing this accurate description of their rhetoric and behavior. Oppressed Whites need to learn this tool of understanding and self defense.<br /><br />While the anti-White activists bring up false anti-White doctrines like "White Privilege" the reality of our society, when normalizing for ability and behavior, is "non-White Privilege", especially Black and Jewish Privilege. Whenever anyone tries to fling the pathetic accusation of White privilege, Whites should immediately point to <a href="http://www.whitenationalism.com/div/Diversity.html">the success of groups like Blacks, Asians and Jews which typically have better outcomes than Whites per capita</a>, especially Jews, whose outcomes are staggeringly higher than Whites in terms of wealth, elite education, media ownership and influence, academic position, campaign finance, elite government positions, etc. Hmmm, how come stories about Jewish influence NEVER EVER appear in the mainstream media while LOTS of anti-White or White-critical stories DO? It must be all that White Privilege typically taught by Jewish or non-White professors and activists. It was enlightening to see the Whiteness Studies conference that had a Shabbat dinner on Friday night in their official schedule as well as a roster containing a majority of Jewish and non-White participants.<br /><br />When a large enough group of Whites drop out of the anti-White Matrix and create alternative institutions that empower and protect Whites, their identity, history, culture and peoplehood, the existing institutions will be forced to either adapt or reveal their raw hatred and oppression of Whites. This large group must be led by a vanguard. Some early pioneers have been at it for decades. Now more of us are joining their efforts. We need to keep widening the circle and to tolerate different kinds of pro-Whites, including the shaky ones in the middle starting with pro-White training wheels.<br /><br />Part of the problem is that Whites have been so deracinated (cut off from their roots) and indoctrinated in White-self-hatred that our culture and identity is a shambles for the vast majority of our brethren. We probably can't fully recover what we once had but we can draw from the best of our heritage and forge a new spirit and culture for our people. We also might not be able to create a monolithic, unitary culture, but if we have several White cultures that mostly share a core of common values across different belief systems, that will be infinitely preferable to our current atomization and deracination. The largest split among pro-Whites is probably between Christians and non-Christians. We should not worry about all Whites having to fit some specific ideology or set of values. Support pro-White diversity!<br /><br />Some Whites will always be implacable enemies. Fine. Let them pursue their suicidal path in their own spaces and we can pursue our destiny separately. Good riddance. Divorce is the solution.<br /><br />In time we can create a White Renaissance.<br /><br />It will take much time and effort to counteract the massive 24x7 anti-White control program that's been operating unimpeded for many decades.<br /><br />Essentially every piece of our "civil society" must have alternative institutions by and for Whites promoting our interests. I've already discussed alternative institutions in detail regarding <a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/02/opposing-left-higher-education.html">higher education in a non-racial manner</a> and <a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/05/white-advocacy-ideas-for-alternative.html">alternative media promoting White advocacy</a>. I also explored <a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/04/illegal-alien-amnesty-last-straw.html">White separation.</a><br /><br />We also need institutions and organizations that subvert the existing ones while not being rabidly or even overtly pro-White. We need to recruit Whites from the middle and take them a step at a time to full-blown White advocacy, ethnocentrism and nationalism. A major attack vector are those areas of our "civil society" that promote lies, anti-White bias or non-White supremacism. Trust in these institutions is already low. When average people see professional quality stories with fully documented details available that expose the lies, distortions and propaganda of the current system, cynicism and distrust will strengthen dramatically and faith and trust will be transferred to the new alternative sources. Anti-White crime is an massive opportunity that needs to be exploited to destroy trust in the current lying system. It wouldn't be an issue if they weren't such vicious lying anti-White bigots so they deserve no sympathy.<br /><br />A major barrier to building pro-White institutions is the current dominance of anti-White racism by "civil society". Budding pro-Whites are assaulted by powerful and wealthy groups like the ADL and $PLC and many other groups coordinated with allies in Hollywood, the MSM, academia, government, corporations and other commanding heights in our society. It will be a long-term struggle to gain our rights and justice. We already have some organizations working for our interests, so let's support them however we can, even if only to spread awareness through personal connections.<br /><br />There are other areas I'd like to discuss, including my long-promised alternative cultural post, which is one of the most important alternatives needed because it is the most powerful force brainwashing most Whites. The sheer repetition of anti-White and pro-multicultural ideology over the full lifetime of most citizens, including the numerous subtle subtexts, is difficult for most people to escape. But imagine a full offering of cultural programming that is pro-White with many of the subtexts and meta-messages inverted from their anti-White bigotry. I believe when many Whites are exposed to hundreds and thousands of hours of pro-White cultural programming, White advocacy will become a mass movement including both our average and cognitive elite populations. <br /><br />It can happen in stages too, where a small nucleus of Whites create and distribute this pro-White content and then gain an modest audience that then grows as the truth, hope and justice of our side inspire more and more Whites to escape their brainwashing.<br /><br />We must build our institutions and their broad acceptance piece-by-piece from the bottom up. We can use our talent and spirit to create something authentic even if we have limited resources compared to our oppressors. Some of these pieces are already in place, like some of the organizations I link to. We must start within our own families, friends and communities. We must contest the universally accepted anti-White bigotry and those who promote it.<br /><br />The future is uncertain. We must work to prepare ourselves for any contingency that comes our way.<br /><br />We'll know we're made progress when large business interests start fearing the anger the White community and pander to us the way they pander to non-Whites.<br /><br />nativeamerican365, black365, jew365, raza365, asian365 are all fully supported by "our" "civil society".<br /><br />white365 must be too.ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-45584665643923161252009-07-25T13:15:00.004-04:002009-07-29T21:39:18.153-04:00An Outstanding Documentary: A Conversation About RaceI've just seen the new documentary <a href="http://www.aconversationaboutrace.com">A Conversation About Race</a> by first-time film maker Craig Bodeker. Wow! What a fantastic exploration of the anti-White double standards surrounding "racism" in modern America. Please purchase a personal copy, show it to family and friends and consider giving it as a gift. The movie costs $20, including shipping and handling. It looks like you can watch it <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1084394769627714346">free online as well</a>.<br /><br />I believe this documentary will help awaken some of the brainwashed Whites to the unfairness of our "civil society" and make them receptive to Whites openly pursuing their interests as much all other groups.<br /><br />This is exactly the sort highly intelligent, fair-minded and thoughtful film maker we need to articulate the White side of story that is never shown by the mainstream media or Hollywood (except to condemn White advocates). I have great hopes for Mr. Bodeker's future works, some of which will hopefully explore issues from a pro-White perspective, including various topics never discussed honestly by the MSM and Hollywood.<br /><br />Hopefully many other White advocates will follow Mr. Bodeker's lead and create additional works spanning the full range of news and cultural products to counter the pervasive anti-White propaganda of our ruling elites.<br /><br />Whites have tremendous talents and resources which are mostly being misdirected against our long-term interests. By breaking out of the "anti-White <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Matrix">matrix</a>" and creating more <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redpill">"red pills"</a>, there will be a positive feedback effect recruiting more and more Whites to awaken, some of whom will become activists and contributers.<br /><br />Just two years ago I myself was a fairly conventional, colorblind, neoconned, pro-Jewish conservative.<br /><br />Not anymore, thanks to the red pills on the internet.<br /><br />Thank you Mr. Bodeker for manufacturing a giant batch of red pills!<br /><br />Hopefully the rest of us can help spread them around and produce more in our own modest ways.<br /><br /><b>Updated 2009-07-29: fixed a grammar error and added a bit more</b>ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-42858448774298927452009-06-25T03:30:00.003-04:002009-06-25T12:13:47.125-04:00Prophets of Doom and the Need for OrganizationHave you ever watched prophets of doom like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=&search_query=peter+schiff&aq=f">Peter Schiff</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=&search_query=gerald+celente&aq=0&oq=gerald+ce">Gerald Celente</a> or <a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=&search_query=alex+jones&aq=f">Alex Jones</a>? My perception is that Peter Schiff is the least extreme while Alex Jones is a full-blown conspiracy theorist (not that there's anything wrong with that if he mostly turns out to be right!). Gerald Celente is intermediate being around half or two-thirds of a full-blown conspiracy theorist.<br /><br />I can't help noticing that each of the three appear to gain fame and make their livelihoods through their pessimistic rhetoric. Peter Schiff's company, Euro-Pacific Capital, sells services based on his theories, he publishes best-selling books and he apparently consults for the rich and powerful (e.g in the UAE). Gerald Celente sells a newsletter and makes many paid appearances while Alex Jones hosts a radio show and produces a lot of DVDs. Both Peter Schiff and Gerald Celente have appeared in many MSM shows in spite of their somewhat anti-Establishment messages. Despite these potential conflicts of interests, many of their claims seem plausible and deserve a fair hearing, especially given their recent predictions of our economic troubles with lucid explanations when the other pundits belittled them while predicting smooth sailing as far as the eye could see.<br /><br />The doomsters share some commonalities in their predictions, particularly in believing a major depression is coming. <a href="http://www.takimag.com/blogs/peterschiff">Peter Schiff</a> seems to believe it's more a matter of incompetence, while <a href="http://www.trendsresearch.com/">Gerald Celente</a> believes they are inflating a final bubble, the "bailout bubble" to succeed the previously popped dot.com and housing bubbles, which will ultimately burst with no further bailouts possible, and that powerful interests will use these turbulent times to bring in more authoritarian control, likely launching a war to distract from total economic collapse. <a href="http://www.infowars.com/">Alex</a> <a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/">Jones</a> seems to have an intricate conspiracy theory about this being a long-standing plan to create a totalitarian world government with most people becoming highly controlled slaves and around 80% of the population being killed using bioweapons. In spite of the seeming outlandishness of some of Alex Jones' beliefs, some of what he says seems quite reasonable, particularly giving the creeping totalitarianism and police state structures. I get the sense that during some of Alex's most agitated rants he is being a bit of a showman, kind of like Glenn Beck periodically comes across as phony, except that Glenn Beck seems a lot more phony than Alex Jones. I've heard maybe around 15 hours of Alex Jones and perhaps 10 hours of Glenn Beck, so I'm no great expert on these guys.<br /><br />I haven't carefully researched much of what these guys say (e.g the alleged misdeeds of the Federal Reserve), but much of their message seems plausible. In particular I strongly suspect that the US economy has been managed badly, e.g. by encouraging speculation over long-term investment, allowing looting by the executive class, losing advanced manufacturing and not properly protecting our markets in balance with how our trading "partners" protect their markets, and that the phony economy will soon come crashing down. Some excellent writers discussing this are <a href="http://buchanan.org/blog/">Pat Buchanan</a> and the Irish economics writer, <a href="http://www.unsustainable.org/index.asp?navID=1">Eamonn Fingleton</a>. I strongly recommend Mr. Fingleton's book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Jaws-Dragon-Americas-Chinese-Hegemony/dp/0312362323">In the Jaws of the Dragon</a> which discusses how the East Asian Economic and Political System is not compatible with Western style capitalism, at least how it's practiced in the US currently.<br /><br />Whether there is a New World Order (NWO) conspiracy to impose totalitarian control on the US and ultimately the entire world is such a disturbing question that deserves a full and fair investigation even if it is likely false.<br /><br />Unfortunately there are many issues needing a similar thorough analysis by fair and objective observers, while most of us can only devote a little time on the side to explore these issues. One goal is for us to eventually create think tanks with full-time scholars and support staff to investigate issues and think creatively about the problems facing us. This is something for White advocates to aim for in the future although <a href="http://blog.vdare.com/">we have</a> <a href="http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/index.html">the beginnings</a> <a href="http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/">of this</a>. Another approach that can be started sooner and with minimal resources is harnessing the power of thousands of part-time activists over the internet by intelligently combining their efforts to enable these sorts of detailed investigations. Many of these investigations can be done with other groups because many of the topics aren't directly related to White advocacy.<br /><br />An example of how important work can be done by non-scholarly activists working part time would be an audit of references in academic works. One controversial example is <a href="http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/books.htm">Kevin MacDonald's books</a> which probably have over 500 references per book. Imagine if a team of volunteers tracked down each and every source that Dr. MacDonald cited and did a fair-use scan of the full context of each citation. These could then be posted on a web site that had special software designed to support this sort of research and criticism. This software could be open-source and could integrate with existing software, like open-source portals or content management systems. Then users could judge whether Dr. MacDonald's books accurately quote and interpret each source. Statistics could be compiled about his accuracy. The critical point is that because everything is open, each assertion can be audited and each viewer can examine the full evidence to see who is reliable or not. For example, if it turned out that Dr. MacDonald was deceptive with 20+% of his references that would reflect badly upon his honesty, while if there were just minor nitpicks and no major duplicitous distortions, then his scholarly honesty would pass the first hurdle.<br /><br />Note that this sort of detailed checking of hundreds of different references is a massive effort for one person, but would be easily doable by a few hundred people donating a few hours per person or by dozens of people giving 20-30 hours per person.<br /><br />With his treatment of sources analyzed, scrutiny could be given to the rest of his text and the validity of his other facts and logic. Links to other sources could be developed in determining the truth. The ultimate result would be a detailed exploration of the truth or falsehood of the book and the underlying issues it discusses. Eventually the same sort of analysis can be applied to other sources with related things linked together for easy navigation to further human knowledge and understanding.<br /><br />Many other authors, journalists, politicians, academics and organizations have works, predictions and promises deserving a careful accounting. Consider all the free trade propaganda that has turned out to be absolutely false. We don't currently have a systematic way to rate pundits and talking heads who've been wrong, very wrong and extremely wrong, yet are still invited back to deceive the public with special-interest propaganda. We desperately need this sort of accountability system to keep our "civil society" honest. Imagine how useful it would be for TV viewers to automatically see a side window pop up when a pundit was talking that had a summary of their historical accuracy, their affiliations, etc. If the viewer desired, then could drill down into the details with arbitrary depth. Ultimately this should encourage greater accuracy and less overt propaganda in the MSM. Here I'm assuming that the next generation or two of TVs will essentially be computer/TV hybrids that are hooked up to the internet, or that cheap devices with this capability will plug into the TVs.<br /><br />By intelligently organizing our efforts we can create virtual think tanks that let us each make a small contribution that synergizes with hundreds or thousands of others to produce a much more powerful result than floundering around in isolation with our efforts having near zero impact. Our scholars could get virtual support staffs to aid their research efforts while channeling the energy of activists that would likely otherwise be wasted. This sort of organization can be applied to many kinds of activities beyond fact and logic checking.<br /><br />This system could be applied to study a variety of other problems and issues. For example various facts, values and arguments could be explored. Evidence could be supplied or pointed to. The goal is a robust exploration of topics that tries to coherently and comprehensively explore issues from all perspectives. Dissenting viewpoints can be integrated into the exploration, in fact, ideally, the system would allow many different factions to concurrently articulate their strongest arguments and counterarguments all using the same system, i.e. everybody from the far left to the far right with all viewpoints in between, including off-the-wall ones. Hopefully by letting each side present its arguments and marshall its facts using the same system, areas of agreement or dissent can be clarified and rational dialog can be encouraged. The resulting explorations would also be excellent learning resources for readers wanting to explore different sides of complicated issues.<br /><br />There would need to be features to fight those that try to subvert the purpose of open dialog, e.g. by creating lots of clutter and disinformation. I believe this can be done while not suppressing free speech. One approach would be that such trolls would eventually be rated by other people that you trust as trolls, so their contributions could be hidden by default. This could be overridden on a case-by-case basis when trusted voters believe the particular contribution adds value. Even though the trolls' contributions would normally be hidden, they would still be accessible so people could check whether or not they are actual trolls or if their viewpoint is being suppressed. Different factions may have different views of who adds value and one feature would let users explore the structure from different perspectives, e.g. what does the exploration look like from the perspective of a revolutionary far-leftist versus a neoconservative versus a White advocate, among dozens or even hundreds of different views.<br /><br />We should fully reject the popular tactic of demonizing speakers, usually using ad hominem attacks, to avoid confronting their arguments. The neocons are notorious for this extreme intellectual dishonesty. Everyone's arguments should be considered in good faith and any flaws pointed out using facts and logic or by highlighting differences in values. In many ways obsession over the left-right divide or partisan party differences is con game designed to intellectually disarm us by limiting our thinking and to have us cheer for "our team", not noticing that both teams are tools of the elites. Instead of mindlessly rejecting anything leftists say, we should thoughtfully consider their points. In some cases they might be correct and we should adapt our viewpoint. We should be reading Chomsky, Nader and others, even though we may disagree with some of their values and beliefs.<br /><br />By creating this enhanced "public institutional memory", those who use dishonest rhetoric will eventually damage their own reputations, while those operating honestly and in good faith will gain trust.<br /><br />I believe we need much more free speech and open investigation while our "civil society" and elites are pushing for the opposite. Just look at the recent flood of articles and op-eds calling for stringent "hate speech" laws to weaken what's left of our Constitutional rights and the <a href="http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/06/12/just-another-day-part-2/">coordinated Jewish effort</a> <a href="http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/06/22/just-another-day-part-6/">to get Pat Buchanan</a> <a href="http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/06/24/buchanan-paleos-and-jews/">fired from his television job</a>. I suspect one major cause of conspiracy theory and paranoia is the suppression of free and unhindered discussion. Ultimately our elites are undermining our "civil society" but perhaps this is intentional.<br /><br /> It's become clear that our "civil society", including academia, think tanks and the MSM, is not trustworthy in many ways and our government has likely succumbed to corruption through lobbying, cultural Marxist infiltration and other influences. Therefore we need to create alterative watchdogs to provide an independent audit of our existing institutions. Some of these alternatives may already exist or do part of the job, but there is a need for much more, particularly those that follow the approach I described above using sophisticated tools to create open research and criticism with full auditing of the facts, logic and values.<br /><br />When we encounter <a href="http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/06/12/just-another-day-part-2/">lies or slander</a> we can harness a community to produce detailed rebuttals with full proof if they don't already exist. Once detailed analyses of different questions exist, they can be referenced while making arguments, and if new information and perspectives arise, they can be integrated into the exploration.<br /><br />I'm curious what other folks think of the doomsters and their messages as well as the rest of the post. I'd be interested in your comments or email.<br /><br />PS.<br /><br />Apologies for the delay in coming out with my alternative culture post, which is my next big article. Hopefully it will be ready within one or at most two weeks. I do have a list of those future posts I've mentioned in previous articles and hope to write one or two per month.ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-5856121074595711712009-05-29T22:15:00.004-04:002009-05-31T15:59:41.185-04:00Anti-White Bias: Ignoring Voter Intimidation<b>Updated 2009-05-31 (below original post).</b><br /><br />Here's a typical example of the anti-White bias of our "civil society" as well as the increasingly brazen corruption of the Obama administration.<br /><br />From the <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/29/career-lawyers-overruled-on-voting-case/">Washington Times</a>: (emphasis mine)<br /><blockquote><br />Justice Department <b>political appointees overruled career lawyers</b> and ended a civil complaint accusing three members of the <b>New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense of wielding a nightstick and intimidating voters</b> at a Philadelphia polling place last Election Day, according to documents and interviews.<br /><br /><b>The incident - which gained national attention when it was captured on videotape and distributed on YouTube - had prompted the government to sue the men, saying they violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act by scaring would-be voters with the weapon, racial slurs and military-style uniforms.</b><br /><br />Career lawyers pursued the case for months, including obtaining an affidavit from a prominent 1960s civil rights activist who witnessed the confrontation and described it as "the most blatant form of voter intimidation" that he had seen, even during the voting rights crisis in Mississippi a half-century ago.<br /><br />The lawyers also had ascertained that one of the three men had gained access to the polling place by securing a credential as a Democratic poll watcher, according to interviews and documents reviewed by The Washington Times.<br /><br /><b>The career Justice lawyers were on the verge of securing sanctions against the men earlier this month when their superiors ordered them to reverse course</b>, according to interviews and documents. The court had already entered a default judgment against the men on April 20.<br /> <br />...<br /><br />To support its evidence, the government had secured an affidavit from Bartle Bull, a longtime civil rights activist and former aide to Sen. Robert F. Kennedy's 1968 presidential campaign. Mr. Bull said in a sworn statement dated April 7 that he was serving in November as a credentialed poll watcher in Philadelphia when he saw the three uniformed Panthers confront and intimidate voters with a nightstick.<br /><br />Inexplicably, the government did not enter the affidavit in the court case, according to the files.<br /><br /><b>"In my opinion, the men created an intimidating presence at the entrance to a poll," he declared. "In all my experience in politics, in civil rights litigation and in my efforts in the 1960s to secure the right to vote in Mississippi ... I have never encountered or heard of another instance in the United States where armed and uniformed men blocked the entrance to a polling location."</b><br /><br />Mr. Bull said the "clear purpose" of what the Panthers were doing was to "intimidate voters with whom they did not agree." <b>He also said he overheard one of the men tell a white poll watcher: "You are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker."</b><br /><br /><b>He called their conduct an "outrageous affront to American democracy and the rights of voters to participate in an election without fear." He said it was a "racially motivated effort to limit both poll watchers aiding voters, as well as voters with whom the men did not agree."</b><br /><br />...<br /></blockquote>The Washington Times has a good editorial discussing this case:<br /><a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/29/protecting-black-panthers/">Protecting Black Panthers: The Obama administration ignores voter intimidation</a><br /><br />The simple identity interchange test of double standards clearly proves this is yet another example of anti-White bias so beloved by our "civil society". If White men had been outside a polling station dressed like the defendents, intimidating Black voters and using language like "You are about to be ruled by the white man, nigger", then our "civil society", including the media, academia and the government, especially the Department of Justice, would've gone ballistic and almost certainly those White men would've been prosecuted to a felony conviction, including hate crimes, and would've served jail time. If the prosecution had failed, they would've found some "civil rights" law trick to overturn the explicit Fifth Amendment right of protection against double jeopardy, until they got their White men.<br /><br />But naturally, if Blacks are the aggressors and Whites the victims, then the rules change. If Sonia Sotomayor is appointed to the Supreme Court, no doubt she'll happily enshrine just these sort of double standards as precedents in "CON-stitutional Law".<br /><br />Yeah, we get it. F*** Whitey and f*** the color-blind society!<br /><br />In looking through <a href="http://news.google.com/news?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22black+panthers%22+philadelphia">Google News</a>, the only mainstream media hits are for the Washington Times, which broke the story, and Fox News, the neoconservative-dominated network. The rest of the hits are for some conservative web sites. The MSM has no problem quickly covering emerging stories that adhere to their preferred, politically correct narrative, but obviously they're reluctant to give this story oxygen, especially when the Obama administration is already busy engaging in obvious corruption, like screwing over the Chrysler bondholders by ignoring established bankruptcy law, only closing Chrylser dealers that were Republican donors, pressuring California to bow to SEIU demands or lose federal stimulus money, the bailouts and their unaccountability, <a href="http://www.porkulus.org">porkulus</a> money for favored clients like ACORN, the education ripoff complex, etc, etc, etc.<br /><br />It will be interesting to see if the MSM gets around to covering this story over the next few days or if they try to squelch it like most other politically incorrect stories.<br /><br />From <a href="http://www.bartleby.com/73/1593.html">bartleby.com</a>:<br /><blockquote>A unidentified lady at the Constitutional Convention in 1787:<br /><i>“Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?”</i><br /><br />Benjamin Franklin:<br /><i>“A Republic, if you can keep it.”</i></blockquote><br />We lost it.<br /><br />Zimbabwe and South Africa, here we come!<br /><br />Yes We Can!<br /><br /><b>UPDATE: 2009-05-31</b><br /><br />Two days after my original post only ONE additional MSM article has appeared in Google News: <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/05/28/justice-department-drops-charges-in-voter-intimidation-case/">this CNN story</a>:<br /><br />Let's see how the "professionals" at CNN cover the story:<br /><br /><blockquote><br />May 28, 2009<br />Justice Department drops charges in voter intimidation case<br />Posted: 07:00 PM ET<br /><br />From CNN Senior Producer Kevin Bohn<br /><br />WASHINGTON (CNN) – The Justice Department is dropping charges against the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense and two of its members who were allegedly involved in voter intimidation on Election Day at a Philadelphia, Pennsylvania polling station.<br /><br />A Justice spokesman said the department decided to take this action after winning an injunction earlier this month against a third member, Samir Shabazz, that prevents him from ever brandishing a weapon outside a polling place again as he was charged with doing last November.<br /><br />Shabazz was one of the three persons, along with the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense, charged with voter intimidation last January in a lawsuit filed under the Voting Rights Act. Shabazz will not face any jail time or a fine.<br /><br />“Claims were dismissed against the other defendants based on a careful assessment of the facts and the law,” DOJ spokesman Alejandro Miyar said in a statement. “The Department is committed to the vigorous prosecution of those who intimidate, threaten or coerce anyone exercising his or her sacred right to vote.”<br /><br />On Election Day, two men in uniforms stood outside the polling station with one of them holding a police-style baton weapon and saying he was providing security there. Justice has alleged that person was Shabazz.<br /><br />In January, Justice said in a criminal complaint that the chairman of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense confirmed its members were stationed at that location as part of a nationwide effort to deploy people at polling stations.<br /><br />The Justice Department says The New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense is distinct from the well-known Black Panther Party of the 1960's.<br /><br />UPDATE: Malik Shabaaz, chairman of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense, told CNN Friday that Samir Shabaaz is no longer a member of the organization, and that his organization does not support voter intimidation.<br /><br />"We want to thank President Obama and his administration for dropping charges against us that were vindictively brought by the Bush administration," Malik Shabaaz told CNN. "We don't condone any type of illegal activity at polling stations."<br /><br />Shabaaz said the members in Pennsylvania were not acting under the direction of the national party.<br /><br />(Updated at 4:30 p.m. on Friday, May 29 with New Black Panther Party response)<br /></blockquote><br /><br />Notice that this story completely ignored the affidavit given by Bartle Bull and it completely ignores the explicity anti-White racial facet of the incident. Even if CNN didn't know this aspect of the story when it was first published on the 28th, which is extremely doubtful, it certainly knew about it after the Washington Times published their detailed article on the 29th well before this story was updated at 4:30pm on the 29th, which was used to further undermine the real issue by quoting a New Black Panther Party leader acting as if the entire incident was some sort of illegitimate persecution of their poor, innocent selves.<br /><br />Notice how this article frames the story as if Justice Department had won some great victory in <i>"winning an injunction ... that prevents him from ever [sic, according to Washington Times story] brandishing a weapon outside a polling place again ..."</i>.<br /><br />Then the DOJ spokesmen is given the floor so he can TELL us that <i>"The Department is committed to the vigorous prosecution of those who intimidate, threaten or coerce anyone exercising his or her sacred right to vote."</i>. Hahahahaha!!! More bulls*** constructed reality! That is exactly what they are NOT doing by treating this serious attack against our supposed civil society so lightly BECAUSE Black activists were culpable. The critical point: would they have behaved the same if the identities were interchanged between Black and White? Answer: No way!!!<br /><br />This is just business as usual for our corrupt, worthless and elite-and-corporate-interest-controlled MSM.<br /><br /><a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/05/white-advocacy-ideas-for-alternative.html">Hopefully "change we can believe in" is coming soon.</a>ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-25647747737138847972009-05-13T19:10:00.004-04:002009-05-13T20:59:51.114-04:00White Advocacy: Ideas for Alternative MediaOne major force brainwashing most Whites against thinking and acting ethnocentrically is the mainstream media (MSM), which includes newspapers, magazines, TV, radio and their internet outposts. Like all of our "civil society" institutions, the MSM constantly treats the smallest assertion of White identity or ethnocentrism as racism or supremacism while hypocritically supporting much stronger racial identity and ethnocentrism among ALL non-White groups. This was an important factor in my realizing that the left is not really "celebrating" other groups so much as despising Whites.<br /><br />So one important strategy for White advocates is to subvert, replace or neutralize the impact of these various anti-White institutions. Essentially we're in a deep hole and, barring some unforeseen catastrophic event, it will take many years, much effort and much better organization to dig ourselves out.<br /><br />Regardless of the many possible futures of the US, Whites must fight against the pervasive anti-White double standards that currently dominate our "civil society". Hopefully our system will be open to reform, and it is even possible that a fair, color-blind society could be recovered where Whites' ethnic interests, identity, peoplehood and survival are treated with the same respect as other groups, but unfortunately, we're on a radically different course and have been for decades.<br /><h4>Some Causes of the Mainstream Media's Anti-White Bias</h4><br />The MSM are dominated by corporate interests, White guilt, multiculturalism, political correctness and disproportionate Jewish influence, among others. Part of this anti-White environment is propagated because the left has gradually taken control of our "civil society" over the last fifty years, so they're able to strongly influence many facets of our culture and society, including co-opting many of our cognitive elites, which further strengthens the forces for the left.<br /><br />The left has changed the rules by first claiming to create a color-blind society, but then heaping contempt on color-blindness in favor of excoriating Whites and their supposed "White Privilege" and <a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/04/some-comments-over-at-roissys.html">explicitly rejecting the color-blind ideal</a>. This, among other evidence, demonstrates their bad faith and animosity to Whites. Of course many on the left probably don't interpret the evidence this way, so part of our advocacy must be to grapple with the various leftist arguments and values in their strongest, most cogent forms, to be able to rebut them, so we can recapture some of our lost brethren and reduce the losses of our cognitive elites in the various cauldrons of leftist indoctrination. I plan to explore this issue in a future post. It's also important to understand the psychology and motivations that drive leftists and how this manifests in their activism and behavior.<br /><br />While the left obsesses over equality of outcome between Whites and NAMs (non-Asian minorities), and insists upon coercive law to create an unnatural parity, I've never seen the slightest concern on their part to level disparities between Whites and Jews, which are about as large, or between Jews and NAMs, which are truly massive, or between Asians and NAMs, or all the various intra-group disparities. If the left is truly concerned with disparate outcomes, why do they focus upon one particular dispartity instead of considering the full set of disparities? Of course, if they confronted the existence of these many disparities, they would have to seriously question their belief that the primary cause of the Black-White disparity is anti-Black racism and discrimination by Whites.<br /><h4>Pressures on Existing Mainstream Media</h4><br /><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/US-newspaper-circulation-sees-apf-15039695.html?.v=6">Fortunately several forms of media are struggling financially</a>, primarily from the emergence of the internet, which radically changes the possibilities and economics of information dissemination as well as increasingly draining the advertising that most media channels rely on to fund their operations. Stories seemingly appear daily lamenting the tribulations of the third estate. Yeehah!<br /><br />The media frequently pushes diversity, multiculturalism, anti-White rhetoric, White guilt and politically correct lies, and it suppresses <a href="http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2008/11/27/brimelow-in-baltimore-thanks-splc">"hate facts"</a>, contrary stories or dissenting views of the diversity party line. They particularly favor hiding non-White crime against Whites, including some shockingly brutal atrocities, like the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Channon_Christian_and_Christopher_Newsom">Knoxville Horror</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wichita_Massacre">the Witchita Massacre</a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Jan_Pawel_and_Quiana_Jenkins_Pietrzak">the killing of the White Polish-American Marine Sgt. Janek "Jan" Pawel Pietrzak and his Black wife, Quiana Jenkins-Pietrzak, by four Black Marines, including two of Sgt. Pietrzak's underlings</a>.<br /><br />An analysis of <a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=%22Janek+Pawel+Pietrzak%22+OR+%22Jan+Pawel+Pietrzak%22+OR+%22Jan+Pietrzak%22+OR+%22Janek+Pietrzak%22">Google</a> or <a href="http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Janek%20Pawel%20Pietrzak%22%20OR%20%22Jan%20Pawel%20Pietrzak%22%20OR%20%22Jan%20Pietrzak%22%20OR%20%22Janek%20Pietrzak%22&sa=N&tab=wn&um=1">Google News</a> stories discussing Sgt. Pietrzak demonstrate that many of the modest portion of the MSM that covered the story, obscured the fact that all four of the killers were Black. Look at how sparse the Google News coverage is over the last month even though new court testimony is currently ongoing. Google News only shows one non-local, English language newspaper covering the story, The New York Daily News, and they don't mention in this story that the four killers were Black, although they had been one of the few MSM outlets to do so previously.<br /><br />Our MSM masters insult our intelligence by <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=6204853">not even mentioning the possibility</a> that maybe, just maybe, there is a racial angle to the killing. This ABC News link contains NO mention of the racial angle and the embedded video also refuses to articulate any possibility of a racial motive, preferring to blather on about the mysterious motive that will probably be forever unknown. It's only tribute to the possibility of a racial angle was their showing the mug shots of all four suspects which demonstrates they were all Black. What the ABC News video actually does is use coded language that might sail over the heads of some average or below-average people who might interpret their language literally, while conveying a subtext that implies a racial motive is present, particularly through their grandiose evasions and subtle clues in framing the story including the images shown and the background details about the couple, but by explicitly refusing to articulate this, they're demonstrating the power of political correctness to enforce a grossly dishonest interpretation of reality in spite of our <a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=richard+pryor+who+are+you+going+to+believe+lying+eyes">"lying eyes"</a>. Ultimately it's an exercise in raw power to condition the viewers to recognize and submit to the officially approved limits of allowed speech and thoughts in our increasingly totalitarian society.<br /><br />This is a classic illustration of <a href="http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=1300">Theodore Dalrymple's observation</a>:<br /><blockquote>Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.</blockquote><br />We're supposed to believe that the killers savagely killed Mr. and Mrs. Pietrzak, including rape and sexual abuse of his wife, for a simple robbery. Even worse a <a href="http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0811/06/ijvm.01.html">CNN transcript</a> of a show from the day before most of the initial stories were published demonstrates that the full details of the story were common knowledge, and presumably all the MSM reporters basically knew the same facts, yet they deliberately chose to hide many of these important details. Note that a few newspapers did report the fact that the four killers were Black, but many deliberately left this out, along with other details indicating the gratuitious violence, rape and racist graffiti.<br /><br />Also, the authorities are guilty in this little charade, since if it had been a Black sergeant and his White wife savagely killed and raped by four White underlings with racist graffiti at the crime scene, they definitely would've pushed for any applicable hate crimes, under massive pressure from a firestorm of international media coverage and howls of outrage by the Black "leadership" gang of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, the NAACP, among others, and, oh yeah, the press and the rest of our "civil society" would INSTANTLY call it a horrible hate crime. There would likely be many statements released by legions of academic activists denouncing the brutal White racism gripping America and hundreds of candlelight vigils would be held across the county with guilt-drenched SWPLs denouncing their Whiteness (really meaning all those non-enlightened troglodyte White masses). Yet for the Pietrzak family slaughter, the MSM don't dare mention the term hate crime (same for the prosecutors up to this point that I've seen). Hate crime? Nah, it's just a robbery gone wrong.<br /><br />I personally think hate crime law is a travesty and should be completely scrapped in favor of only enforcing the law based on the criminal's actions without trying to puzzle out whether politically incorrect throughts were motivating the criminal, but given the existence of hate crimes, they should be applied objectively, uniformly and fairly. Obviously in this case and several other notable cases, horrific hate crimes have been committed against Whites with absolute silence from our worthless "civil society". The easy test for double standards is whether people think or act differently when identities are interchanged as I illustrated above.<br /><br />The media is losing credibility because of their blatant political correctness and dishonesty in hiding and obscuring Black and immigrant crime, among other taboos. "Coincidentally", the big and little lies they push also benefit globalist, corporate interests and a small, wealthly elite, while marginalizing non-elite Whites and the middle and working classes in general. Blacks are and will be hurt more in the future by massive third world immigration, but their "leadership" doesn't care.<br /><br />The government is also losing credibilty with their handling of this case. These sorts of double standards are exactly why I've given up on the color-blind society and realized it's a huge con game with Whites as total chumps (and I don't think I'm alone in making this conclusion).<br /><br />Although this media bias hasn't gone unnoticed, and even though many average people might feel uneasy about the media, they don't have any viable alternatives, since even "conservative" media is really mostly neoconservative and in thrall to corporate interests, which also supports much of the politically correct, multicultural agenda, including massive legal immigration and amnesty.<br /><br />The rise in cynicism and the loss of credibility coupled with the technological possibilities of the internet provide an opportunity for serious alternatives to arise.<br /><br />Closely related is the development of alternative cultural production and the arts which I'll consider in a separate post.<br /><br />First I'll lay out some reasons why a diverse alternative media that begins reaching a wider audience seems inevitable, and after considering the specific alternative channels, I'll consider other facets of alternative mass media. America has had a variety of alternative media channels for many decades. In the realm of newspapers and magazines, a wide variety of relatively low circulation offerings have probably been available stretching back to the founding of our republic and certainly many niche publications covering the full political spectrum from far-right to far-left have been available throughout the 20th century.<br /><br />The internet has enabled a wider audience to see alternative perspectives with very little effort or cost to the consumer, while many of the traditional media costs, like printing and mailing have been eliminated for internet publications. Not surprisingly, many new internet-only publications have sprung up reaching much larger audiences than were previously possible.<br /><br />Basically I believe it will soon be possible for a variety of alternative viewpoints to begin reaching a much wider audience than previously possible because technological changes will let mass consumers easily bypass the current corporate-controlled distribution channels, like TV cable networks or limited radio channels, using internet-based devices. It will be interesting to see how the established media react to the onslaught of competition from so many diverse sources, including various ethnic advocates, the full spectrum of political beliefs from far left to far right, quirky subcultures and bands of amateur individuals, among others.<br /><br />Let's now consider some specific media.<br /><h4>Alternative Magazines</h4><br />Alternative magazines are probably the most successful form of alternative media with the widest current readership. They've blossomed in the internet era as the quintessential example of how internet technologies make it much cheaper to produce and distribute content, enabling an end run around corporate control mechanisms, like limited exposure through bookstores, magazine stands, etc. By using various open-source products and tools, including sophisticated content management systems, attractive, powerful and professional sites can be developed very inexpensively. As new web technologies are developed, web savvy activists can stay right at cutting edge.<br /><br />Magazines are typically distinguished from newspapers in being delivered on a weekly or monthly basis instead of daily and including more analysis and background rather than raw news coverage. But this distinction seems be eroding somewhat as most online magazines have daily online content that supplements their traditional periodical content.<br /><br />A few good examples are <a href="http://blog.vdare.com">VDARE</a>, <a href="http://www.takimag.com">Taki's Magazine</a> and <a href="http://antiwar.com">antiwar.com</a>. I trust VDARE on immigration and other topics far more than any MSM source. Taki's Magazine is an internet-only magazine offering a traditional or paleoconservative perspective that has been pushed out of the entire MSM by liberals and neoconservatives with very few exceptions like Pat Buchanan, who probably has to mask his real views at least a little to avoid losing his media role. Many of us who imbibed the neoconservative party line from National Review, the Weekly Standard, Fox News or Rush Limbaugh, now realize there is a much wider universe thanks to the alternative media available mostly through the internet. Likewise antiwar.com gives a critique of American imperial and war policies rarely seen in the MSM.<br /><br />There are hundreds and even thousands of additional sites covering the full spectrum politically and focusing on different target audiences and subject areas. A goal of White advocates is to support existing White-friendly sites while creating and supporting more. When I say White-friendly, I mean it probably doesn't push White advocacy hard, but rather completely rejects the typical anti-White assumptions of the MSM and includes positive views of Whites, probably mostly implicitly, is open to questioning all the current sacred cows and provides a more respectful view of White advocates, among a wide range of voices. Separate media outlets might take up White advocacy more directly. The goal is to encourage an open, honest dialogue and fair treatment.<br /><br />Part of the propaganda war against Whites is accomplished through subtle (and not-so-subtle) injections of anti-White digs into stories concerned with other matters. We can use the same techniques in the media we control and influence. This should be particularly effective in other domains, like cultural production. So, for example, other topics, like family, parenting, cooking, lifestyle, travel, cultural, educational and many other subjects can be developed that support subtle, non-overbearing White-friendly rhetoric. The goal is to displace a noticeable portion of the audience currently given to corporate media that nearly universally pushes political correctness, multiculturalism and anti-White subtexts. Some of these new media can even be financially self-supporting or lucrative through revenue streams currently going to anti-White corporations. Others may run mostly on volunteer labor with charitable donations or White-friendly foundations supporting the core costs. One approach might be to create more regional and community content to build local participation and identity instead of our current phony top-down, leveled, national culture driven by the manipulative values of our elites and corporations desiring good, little consumers buying lots of crap they mostly don't need.<br /><br />An excellent project would be to create a White-friendly current events magazine that competes with Time, Newsweek and US News and World Report while keeping the costs much more contained through mostly web operation and skillful use of volunteer labor and organization. Hopefully it could eventually be reasonably self-supporting and synergize with a network of White-friendly companies, organizations and other media allies. Many of the skills used to create professional alternative media have market value, so volunteer labor can also gain valuable experience, skill enhancement and networking to further the volunteer's career while fulfilling activist passions.<br /><br />Another approach is to aggregate content from several existing alternative magazines to create a higher-reach virtual magazine. This can also act as advertising for the original publications by making more readers aware of the different specific sites. A related concept is to create a Reader's-Digest-like magazine that simplifies and highlights the most important points both for time-limited readers and average readers with non-elite literacy skills. Imagine providing Steve Sailor summaries accessible to the everyday folks along with their ability to navigate to additional detail if they need convince their peers of the substance of the points. An important goal is to enable both our elites and average citizens learn to rebut the left's arguments and rhetoric through facts, logic and our own rhetorical techniques for offense and defense. This is an important part to trying to salvage our "civil society" by opposing and ultimately reversing its current anti-White bias.<br /><br />I believe that print-on-demand technology, e.g. at an airport booth, will make it feasible to create inexpensive hardcopy magazines for those wanting to read physical media while cutting out pretty much all of the traditional costs and complexities of physical distribution. But many consumers won't bother with reading physical media when they can directly read the content over the web, including the proliferation of flexible new devices. Imagine an Amazon Kindle-like device with another two or three generations of development where you have high-quality color screens that look like paper where you're wired into the internet to follow links, look up unknown words, automatically delve into greater detail for topics discussed in articles, etc. And new magazine content can be automatically retrieved if the user chooses.<br /><br />Even better, some of these devices will likely enable a full range of media viewing, including magazines, newspapers, audio, radio and TV, as well as sophisticated information management tools. A major goal is for White advocates to be on the cutting edge in developing and exploiting these many changes both to benefit economically as well as spreading our message.<br /><h4>Alternative Newspapers</h4><br />As mentioned earlier newspapers are under particular market pressure for many reasons including the loss of subscribers as many consumers shift to internet for their daily news, while their primary sources of advertising revenue, including classified ads, are transferred to other channels, like the internet and direct mail. And, as previously discussed, a fair number of people are aware that newspapers are not providing the full story for many important issues, are beset by political correctness and multicultural ideology, and that most are owned by a handful of corporations closely interconnected to our ruling elites, but there aren't too many alternatives.<br /><br />Most newspapers rely on a few news services, like the Associated Press or Reuters, to provide much of their national and international coverage and pretty much all of these services are aligned with the globalist, multicultural elites. Many of the European news services are closely tied to the state elites, commonly receiving government financing and various monopolistic advantages, and it clearly shows in their coverage.<br /><br />Even much of the traditional alternative press, which is normally somewhat liberal or leftist, is being bought by corporations to target their predominantly SWPL readers. Some local, alternative conservative newspapers also exist, for example, publishing weekly.<br /><br />A critical way to gain credibility is to exploit the dishonesty of the current media by bolding covering the stories suppressed by the MSM, particularly politically incorrect crime. The public craves accurate and honest information but the current elites don't want to provide it because it directly conflicts with their goal of radically transforming our country demographically and politically, meaning their plans are directly against the interests of most of the native population, but they don't want the chumps to understand this. Imagine sites that keep reliable and detailed statistics and stories regarding politically incorrect local crimes and other attempted official malfeasance, like when police in some large cities try to keep crime statistics down by discouraging victims from filing crime reports. If the general public knew there were reporters and activists committed to fighting this official corruption, it would be much harder for the elites to continue their current con game, because sympathetic sources, including those within our institutions, would know they'd have trustworthy reporters to inform.<br /><br />Unless the elites try to create a totalitarian state, they will be unable to stop the free flow of information. If they do try to create the totalitarian state, they will likely find they've gone to far and have caused a major rebellion against their usurpations, at least if they try within the next decade or two.<br /><br />It is vital that we create some White-friendly newspapers, including many local ones and at least a few national and international ones. A service can be created by pooling together the resources of many local actors with some national and international resources supported by the many local papers and other organizations, foundations and donors who value these alternatives. Many of the national and international resources can actually be part of an international network of people cooperating to provide wide coverage while mostly using local resources in each case. For example, hundreds and even thousands of European volunteers and advocates could provide substantial coverage throughout Europe for worldwide audiences, just like thousands of American workers can provide American coverage for European audiences as well as Americans. Some of this already exists on the internet, but it hasn't been organized to synergize into effective national and international networks.<br /><br />Many of the local newspapers can start by supplementing existing local newspapers. So instead of attempting comprehensive local coverage, they can start by focusing on those stories normally supressed by corporate media. They can also act as critics of the local papers by demonstrating the various devious and dishonest ways that stories and events are censored and slanted by corporate media. They can also provide truly free speech related to local issues, unlike many existing newspapers which censor many politically incorrect comments. I believe a better approach than censorship is to provide various tools that allow people to filter out intellectual sabateurs without actually suppressing free speech. For example, in an open forum, some people might try to disrupt honest argumentation by creating many nuisance posts. Eventually such commenters will lose their credibility with most readers who will ignore anything they say. I believe tools could be built that would allow full freedom of speech while empowering users and groups of users to overcome those who essentially argue in bad faith and detract from useful discussions. Other tools could also help in supporting or rebutting arguments by pointing to more detailed arguments and evidence. The goal is to encourage honest, open-minded and thoughtful consideration of many different perspectives to try to come up with the truth and the best policies. I plan to discuss this more in a separate post.<br /><br />Much of this work can be done purely using the internet and various low-cost or free content management tools. Guides can be created to help intelligent average citizens act as effective fact checkers, researchers, reporters, writers and editors. I also suspect that many older, retired citizens who are deeply concerned about the direction and future of our country will volunteer, and since they are retired, they are less able to be intimidated for fear of their future career. So ultimately much less money would be needed because we could harness more activist and volunteer labor and we would not be so concerned about making money. The more success this media achieves, the more volunteers, donors and supporters it will attract. Parts of the media could also pursue various media-related revenue streams which would both empower themselves while denying those resources to the anti-White corporate media.<br /><br />One way local volunteers and workers, in many cases relative amateurs, can act as effective reporters is to get out and do much of the tedious legwork that is a vital part of genuine reporting. That involves attending various official or community meetings, talking with many different people within the community, pooling and analyzing local information, much like an intelligence gathering operation, analyzing various official and legal records, building relationships with various power brokers, bureaucrats, elites and average workers within many different organizations, and assertively using laws like the Freedom of Information Act to compel the authorities to provide information in the public interest. Evasive or deceptive behavior by authorities can be exposed to create public pressure for keeping them honest. As these movements gain more credibility, it will be much easier for sympathetic or self-interested members of institutions like government, corporations, organizations, etc, to act as sources, including anonymous whistle blowers. Obviously great care must be taken when working with anonymous sources who sometimes have selfish interests for selectively leaking some information or disinformation. Alternative newspapers and news services can have a public web page with different ways to contact reporters to provide information, providing tips on internet anonymity, uploading documents securely over the web, phone calls, personal meetings and even clock-and-dagger techniques for the extremely cautious, like Deep Throat used during Watergate. Also, as they gain prominance, officials will be forced to give these reporters the same rights they given to other professional reporters.<br /><br />By focusing on honesty, accuracy, objectivity, fairness and long-term credibility, trust can be built up among Whites and non-Whites alike. The core of White advocacy to me is that Whites are merely arguing for simple fairness so that they are treated no worse or better than any other group and that we can pursue our interests just as much as other groups are allowed and encouraged to. White Advocacy to me is about being pro-White rather than anti-Black or anti-Jewish. Sure, some parts of other communities sometimes do things we consider anti-White and we'll criticize them for that, just as it would be reasonable for members of other communities to criticize Whites if they believe Whites have behaved unfairly, like various historical injustices Whites have committed against Blacks, Native Americans or Jews that needed to be rectified and atoned for. Ultimately, we need to look to the future and try to build a positive, healthy and fair society, and I think free speech, inquiry and debate are critical tools to achieving that.<br /><br />A major goal for much of this new alternative media is to be White-friendly so that our perspectives, beliefs and arguments are treated with the respect, objectivity and fairness they rarely receive in any MSM. Critical scrutiny would also be applied to current sacred cows whose misdeeds are currently shielded by the MSM. The overriding goal is to overturn the current political correctness and de facto censorship that help to deeply corrupt our "civil society" and to reach out to our currently brainwashed average citizens and cognitive elites. Although there would likely be many different niches within the White advocacy ecosystem, I think this relatively moderate one is the most important because it can help the most in deprogramming large numbers of our people and breaking the political correctness stifling much of public conversation.<br /><br />Print-on-demand stations that rapidly print magazines or newspapers in airports or news kiosks, can be exploited. For example, if a customer knows they're going to go by a certain kiosk, they can order their desired product and prepay for it using standard online payment systems so they'll be assured of not having any significant wait. There might even be a fully automated disbursement system where they enter a purchase code and it automatically dispenses their order with no human intervention. They can choose which stories to include in the printout based on their interests. So each person may get the parts that most interest them. Perhaps it typically takes 20 or 30 seconds to print out a typical custom newspaper (it probably won't have the huge volume of ads that current ones do) and by preordering they can avoid any delays from competing customers. Although the printers would probably be designed so that customers rarely have to wait longer than three minutes under most circumstances even if they walk up. Of course within a few years you'll be able to have your mobile device detect your location and automatically show you local kiosks and their availability and let you quickly make your desired order. This shows how current magazine and newspaper distribution could be radically changed for those demanding paper copies.<br /><br />But probably most people would dump paper altogether and just read the content over the web or on new-and-improved devices, as discussed above for magazines.<br /><h4>Alternative TV</h4><br />TV is the critical media for reaching our average citizens. Many average and below-average people don't read all that much but watch plenty of TV. This is a crucial media that must be challenged both for news and for culture production, which I plan to discuss separately. TV can also be valuable for our cognitive elites, with high-quality, thoughtful and articulate programs being an important niche we must cover, i.e. a PBS alternative.<br /><br />Imagine brutally honest documentaries done with professional graphics and reporters intelligible to average TV viewers directly confronting topics like Non-Asian Minority crime or immigration and how various elites benefit from deceiving the general public about these problems. I think within a year or two such shows would capture significant market attention, even if it was secret guilty pleasure of borderline SWPLs. Imagine frequent, vivid illustrations of how our country is being colonized and transformed into an alien land, which normally Hollywood and the MSM love to hide while propagandizing us with warm little lies. Imagine an investigative news magazine that targets Hollywood, the MSM, corporations, the refugee industry, and the full universe of our politically correct, multicultural and leftist enforcers. Imagine talk shows with experts like Peter Brimelow, Steve Sailor and Jared Taylor instead of the usual liberals and neocons. Of course I'm all in favor of useful debates between a wide range of people including leftists, liberals, various non-White advocates, neocons, moderates and others. The problem is that paleoconservatives, race realists and other perspectives have been almost entirely excluded from MSM exposure and the exposure they typically get has negative framing.<br /><br />Pretty much all the news programs produced today like morning, noon, nightly and late night news as well as actual breaking news and special events could be covered. Also the full range of support and analysis, like talk shows, interviews, documentaries, debates, group discussions and many others. We should be open to emerging and innovative formats, especially those exploiting new technological possibilities that encourage wider community participation. Various technologies like voice masking could be used to encourage participation in controversial subjects while political correctness still reigns.<br /><br />The critical innovation will be a new generation of devices that will allow TV sets to connect to the internet and download content, essentially bypassing our current satellite, cable and broadcast channels. These have revolutionary potential to break the corporate control currently applied to all of these capital-intensive or physically constrained distribution channels. So new virtual networks and stations can be created that anyone can "tune into" over the internet. If people like what they see, they will explore other offerings on these channels and related media, and they will recommend these channels to their friends and family.<br /><br />The new devices can be based on open standards and even open-source software with new features being added periodically. They would have disk storage and act like a DVR where they can hold store shows, perhaps even hundreds or thousands of shows before they run out of space. They might very easily allow extra storage like external hard disks to be added that can boost the available storage. They might even allow customers to use and support peer-to-peer networking so the users can donate some of their internet bandwidth, particularly when they're not using it, and some small portion of their storage to hosting general content, so that there no central server is needed to host the content. Instead the general public can mostly use each others' storage devices to retrieve the shows, which makes media distribution time and cost much lower for content creators. Peer-to-peer technologies can also have very high-performance. Based on upcoming internet improvements, many people will probably be able to watch high-definition TV shows, including news, with at most a short delay to cache a little data to improve the quality of the performance. But people could also automatically download the shows they know they want to see so they can watch without having to worry about network problems disrupting the show.<br /><br />Even slow network connections would be able to download shows of interest with high quality, it would just take more time, so they would wait to watch the show until after it is fully or nearly downloaded. Like DVRs the devices would be able to both download new content while playing currently stored content. The software could make it easy to create disks to store the shows to share with others who may not have internet access or for archiving. These devices could have reasonably intuitive on-screen menus and help to make them easy for average users. Since they're hooked to the internet, they could download audiovisual help that explains the devices, or allow users to browse help forums on their TV looking for help with their problems or to post a question. The device could probably enable full blown web surfing and other information services and tools as well as TV, especially now that most TVs will be high-definition. Some new internet-TV synergies may be possible, allowing the TV content to be playing in part of the screen while enabling other tools to work next to that. For example, the user may make text or audio notes that comment on the TV show, perhaps to investigate or clarify some point. Friends or virtual communities could interact while watching a show together or a user could create comments and questions for other members of a virtual community synchronized with different parts of a show. One use of the capability would be for activists to critique and analyze existing shows to help create guides debunking MSM propaganda and manipulation.<br /><br />The tools to create news programs and documentaries, like cameras and editing equipment are much cheaper than historically, so low-cost equipment can be used to create professional-looking shows. Ideas, techniques and software can be shared and developed by this network of local channels, further lowering costs and improving effectiveness.<br /><br />So given the possibilities of this new technical infrastructure, we want to create a White-friendly alternative media just like for the magazine and newspaper segments. In fact many of the same people can contribute across these different media, for example, doing research and journalistic leg work, and the different organizations can closely collaborate and cross-promote one another. Again, local people can start by covering the set of local stories that are currently suppressed and heavily slanted to build up market credibility. These various local virtual channels can pool their efforts with other local channels to create virtual national channels, perhaps with a small dedicated national or international staff.<br /><br />As far as advertising, among other possibilities, we can promote local manufacturers, businesses, organizations and individuals that are committed to strengthening local communities and American workers instead of offshoring, outsourcing and insourcing foreign workers like so many amoral, traitorous corporations. Ideally we'd create some alternate retail channels that supply American products made by real Americans. I'll explore those ideas in a separate post. Funding could include donations from appreciative audiences. Using the internet many small donations would go far in helping these enterprises stay solvent. For example, viewers could become sponsors of a yearly series by paying $10, or if they particularly like a show, they can give a $5 donation. They could buy moderately priced disk sets for their personal use or to give as gifts.<br /><br />One interesting application would be to capture an MSM news show, like the nightly news and then wrap critical content around it so that average people can see where the corporate media is trying to manipulate and deceive them. This can be linked to proof, like detailed documents and stories that elaborate on this for those that want to verify the accuracy of the critiques. This approach can be applied to any TV production, including cultural production, documentaries, public debate, government meetings, etc.<br /><br />These media can tie into partners in other media, like web sites, magazines, newspapers, radio, organizations, etc. One goal within White advocacy is to create broad networks that collaborate and synergize.<br /><br />If a network became large and professional enough, it might eventually be hosted by traditional cable or satellite systems. The network could also be something of a grab bag that has a wide-range of shows, particularly early on when less content is being produced.<br /><h4>Alternative Radio</h4><br />New communication technologies will make inexpensive audio feeds through the internet or personal mobile devices possible so that traditional radio can be supplemented or displaced, just like TV. The main goal is to make it extremely easy and convenient for average people. The same points made for other media pretty much apply to radio as well.<br /><h4>General Strategy of Alternative Media</h4><br />It is likely that as alternative media becomes more successful, the MSM will feel pressured to be more honest in their coverage of issues, since they'll have been embarrassed by the detailed exposure and critiques they will suffer. This would be good since it would demonstrate success in improving our "civil society" to be more honest and less anti-White.<br /><br />Since our highest goals are not making money and serving our corporate masters, we can be free to pursue any innovations that emerge, even if they don't bring in revenue. It is likely that many new possiblities will arise in the future, some of which will likely have revenue potential.<br /><br />A wide range of content targeted to different audiences should eventually be produced. For example we need to target average, above average and exceptional people. Other demographic segments should also be targeted like different age groups, both sexes, different subcultures, including blue collar workers, small businessmen, professionals, government, law enforcement and military, non-White groups, and even artsy, SWPL-types and committed leftists. Different segments may be reachable to some degree by packaging the message differently. In fact constructive relations with non-Whites can be enhanced when they hear an open and honest hearing of White advocacy which I see as pro-White but not anti-non-White, other than our desire to stop further non-White colonization of our country which will upset the ethnic balance of the nation and likely ultimately lead to serious societal problems if not checked. If Whites behave badly, they should be chided and likewise if non-Whites behave badly, they should also be held accountable. A major problem with our current "civil society" is its intentional rejection of a simple, fair standard like this in favor of anti-White ideology.<br /><br />Although my personal preference is for scrupulously honest reporting and analysis, logically we'd want to have the full spectrum of voices, including those that directly confront various strategems and dirty fighting of the left without being constrained by slavish adherence to the Marquess of Queensberry rules. We need to learn from what our competitors are doing and not doing and also from our mistakes.<br /><h4>Providing Superior Services</h4><br />Since our main goal is to encourage open dialogue and spread our message, we would be very flexible in helping consumers receive and manage our message. For example, we'd make it easy to retrieve archives, search for particular segments of interest, create notifications when user-specified subjects are to be discussed and so on.<br /><br />Many of our programs would be more enjoyable because they wouldn't constantly be interrupted by annoying commercials which usually undermines any genuinely thoughtful exploration of a topic. Our shows would also be more interesting because we would enable full discussions unconstrained by the chains of political correctness. More accurately, we'd want to create several different virtual channels that would cater to different segments. One important target audience are the large group of Whites mostly brainwashed by anti-White ideology, so the channels targeting them would be more subtle and circumspect in countering the normal MSM propaganda while raising questions about typical MSM assumptions and values. As consumers are deprogrammed, hopefully many would begin exploring more blunt alternatives.<br /><br />Since the most important parts of our alternative media would be highly truth focused, we could provide much more background and raw data for interested consumers to see the validity of our reporting. For example, detailed collections of legal documents, perhaps with a few blackouts for the reasonable privacy of innocent parties or irrelevant personal details, FOIA requests and their responses or denials, would be linked to stories, along with more background information and full interview transcripts, press conferences, etc. The goal is to provide much more raw material allowing truth auditing than the press normally provides. This sort of truth auditing can be done by well-organized teams of people.<br /><br />Other sources could be linked or excerpted under fair use. With some improved software tools some of this effort may not be all that difficult and over time very powerful resources could be built up exploring many issues. For example related stories, topics, background, and many other facets could be interrelated. The tools could also be provided to consumers to help them deftly navigate and search these resources as well as enabling an extensive community that would ultimately help recruit further members and volunteers, while allowing vigorous debate with opponents which would help us sharpen our understanding and arguments, or even make corrections or alter our viewpoint when we're wrong.<br /><h4>Alternative Supplements and Watchdogs to Existing Media</h4><br />I plan to do a separate post discussing a variety of information services that would act as resources for White advocacy and other topics, but one valuable service is the media watchdog. Some already exist, like Media Research Center, but it seemed to have a somewhat partisan GOP and neoconservative slant when I last followed it off-and-on a few years ago. Sometimes we could make use of existing media watchdogs, but we'd also want our own to expose media bias, manipulation and propaganda based on our concerns.<br /><br />One very important service would be to dissect MSM stories and shows showing exactly how they lie, omit, distort and otherwise dishonestly report the news. Analysis of how they serve other interests could also be done, including navigating the web of corporate and financial relationships linking various power structures.<br /><br />Part of the offerings would be classic examples of the various propaganda techniques to educate and sensitize the public to dishonest reporting, while another part would be ongoing analysis of everyday news. Much of this everyday analysis could be done by an organized set of amateur volunteers who could be trained and managed by more sophisticated leaders. They could also use powerful information tools and databases to explore other stories and facts related to the story. This technique could be applied to local, regional, national and international stories and the MSM stories could be linked to corresponding alternative media treatments or to alternative media supplements that provide additional details that the MSM left out. By providing these politically incorrect details that the MSM loves to omit, alternative media will both weaken the public's trust in the MSM while enhancing their own reputation.<br /><h4>Some Miscellaneous Thoughts</h4><br />One key requirement for building these alternative media starting with limited resources is to begin organizing and managing those resources available to us more intelligently and strategically. By pooling a relatively modest contribution of money, time, intelligence, creativity, energy and drive from tens and hundreds of thousands of volunteers, we could achieve far more than just complaining over the internet. I plan to discuss this in a separate post.<br /><br />Our new media organizations would periodically be infiltrated by leftists and others desiring to undermine them. We would need to be cautious to prevent them from undermining the trust that must be built up slowly and carefully. Since a key value is honesty and transparency, there aren't any particular secrets to hide, but we must still think strategically about how they might try to undermine our fledgling institutions using dirty tricks.<br /><br />We'll need a group of White advocacy lawyers and legal organizations to help defend against various attacks from our opponents, including frivilous lawsuits designed to consume our resources and energy. If they play dirty, we can also use our creativity to return the favor.<br /><br />If a censorship regime is created here, we'd need to apply a wide-ranging strategy to overcome this. This is actually a real issue, because many parts of the White world are already facing creeping totalitarianism and censorship much more serious than the US. We'll likely need to help support and strengthen many technologies and services designed to evade censorship and government control. We'd likely have to work on dispersing our content across many countries worldwide and helping average people learn how to work around official censorship using various software tools. Fortunately we wouldn't be alone because there any many different groups working to overcome government censorship.<br /><br />It's also important to remember that not everyone in the government is happy with the direction things are moving, so one important goal is to encourage our natural allies within many elite-dominated institutions to help undermine the elite and corporate power grabs, corruption and malfeasance.ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com25tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-27217773641640169322009-04-28T19:42:00.010-04:002009-04-29T22:39:15.302-04:00Some Comments Over at Roissy's<b>Update: 2009-04-29: 2nd update</b><br /><br />I've actually done a bunch more posts (16+) on the second thread mentioned below. And they involve a lot of interaction with some other posters, including a typical Jewish, bad-faith douchebag. Head on over to <a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/sobering-thought-of-the-day">Roissy's and check it out</a>! I'm probably gonna be too lazy to copy all of these over to this post when you all can just read it all in context. That'll leave more time to finish up my giant post on subverting the MSM I hope to publish within a day or two.<br /><br /><b>Update: 2009-04-29</b><br /><br />I've followed Latte Island's suggestion to copy the comments here as a courtesy. There are some very thoughtful commenters over at Roissy's though, so you might want to check them out in their full context, as well as some other commenters running other conversations that are interesting.<br /><br /><b>Original post with some editing</b><br /><br />I've posted a number of somewhat long comments on two of Roissy's recent posts, discussing topics like Jews, Blacks, Whites, "civil society", immigration, etc.<br /><br />The first thread discusses immigration and the demographic transformation of California.<br /><br /><a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/text-message-of-dire-portent/">First Thread: Text Message Of Dire Portent</a><table><tr><td><a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/text-message-of-dire-portent/#comment-70217">First Comment</a></td><td><a href="#comment1-1">Local Copy of Comment</a></td></tr><br /><tr><td><a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/text-message-of-dire-portent/#comment-70289">Second Comment</a></td><td><a href="#comment1-2">Local Copy of Comment</a></td></tr><br /><tr><td><a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/text-message-of-dire-portent/#comment-70293">Third Comment</a></td><td><a href="#comment1-3">Local Copy of Comment</a></td></tr></table><br />In the second thread I make much longer comments covering a variety of topics.<br /><br /><a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/sobering-thought-of-the-day">Second Thread: Sobering Thought of the Day</a><table><tr><td><a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/sobering-thought-of-the-day/#comment-70954">First Comment</a></td><td><a href="#comment2-1">Local Copy of Comment</a></td></tr><br /><tr><td><a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/sobering-thought-of-the-day/#comment-71102">Second Comment</a></td><td><a href="#comment2-2">Local Copy of Comment</a></td></tr><br /><tr><td><a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/sobering-thought-of-the-day/#comment-71103">Third Comment</a></td><td><a href="#comment2-3">Local Copy of Comment</a></td></tr><br /><tr><td><a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/sobering-thought-of-the-day/#comment-71149">Forth Comment</a></td><td><a href="#comment2-4">Local Copy of Comment</a></td></tr></table><br />Roissy and some of his commenters are sharp and have interesting things to say.<br /><br />If I make some more comments later, I'll add more links above. You all can also just jump to the thread and search for my handle, or you certainly might like reading over other folks comments as well.<br /><br />I'm also working on a long post (and have been for a while) on ideas for subverting and replacing the mainstream media. I hope to have it finished in a day or two.<br /><br />I'm curious whether folks like my giant posts, which I hope are somewhat logically coherent in covering a subject, or whether you all would like me to break them up into smaller chunks, perhaps with a "table of contents" post for a set of them. I'm not sure if they're so long, it gets to be a trial to read the whole thing.<br /><br /><h3><a name="comment1-1">Thread 1: Comment 1</a></h3><br />Yeah, but how old are you G?<br /><br />Are you over 45?<br /><br /><h3><a name="comment1-2">Thread 1: Comment 2</a></h3><br />Well said Lucius.<br /><br />To detail the implications of my question to G, California has radically changed demographically over the last 60 years, particularly since the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965">Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965</a>.<br /><br />You can view the historical ethnic demographics for the US, including California at the <a href="http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0056/twps0056.html">US Census Bureau</a> in Excel or PDF files.<br /><br />The results for California (through 1990) indicate:<table><br /><tr><th>Year</th><th>%White</th><th>%Black</th><th>% non-Hispanic White</th></tr><br /><tr><td>1940</td><td>95.50</td><td>1.8</td><td>89.49</td></tr><br /><tr><td>1950</td><td>93.66</td><td>4.4</td><td>N/A</td></tr><br /><tr><td>1960</td><td>91.97</td><td>5.6</td><td>N/A</td></tr><br /><tr><td>1970</td><td>89.01</td><td>7.0</td><td>N/A but 76.27 from 15% sample, 78.00 from 5% sample</td></tr><br /><tr><td>1980</td><td>76.18</td><td>7.7</td><td>66.60</td></tr><br /><tr><td>1990</td><td>68.97</td><td>7.4</td><td>57.22</td></tr><br /><tr><td>2006</td><td>59.8</td><td>6.2</td><td>43</td></tr><br /></table><br />The last line comes from the 2006 ACS Estimates according to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_California">Wikipedia</a>.<br /><br />So there have been large and rapid changes to ethnic demographics in California (no surprise).<br /><br />Our traitorous elites would like to Californicate the rest of the country the same way if they can get away with it.<br /><br />We shouldn’t let them.<br /><br /><h3><a name="comment1-3">Thread 1: Comment 3</a></h3><br />@G<br /><br />My point was that if you were a young man, you wouldn’t have been alive to witness the full scope of the demographic changes in California. You’ve only witnessed the latest incremental step in our out-of-control immigration, which might not look that radical if seen from the perspective of, say, ten years (although I’ve actually seen many natives report how much worse it has gotten over the last 10 years.<br /><br /><br /><h3><a name="comment2-1">Thread 2: Comment 1</a></h3><br />Obsidian said:<br /><blockquote><br />Voodude makes a powerful point that I’ve been thinking about for awhile now-why are people, who don’t live among or even near such “others” spend so much time thinking, writing, ruminating about said “others”? I mean, its pretty clear that Roissy and others, take great care not to rub elbows w/NAMs in any major way, if at all.<br /><br />So…wassup with that?<br /></blockquote><br />To answer your point about rubbing elbows with NAMs, our "civil rights" laws deny the historic right of free association, so it is both illegal and abhorred by our "civil society" for a group of Whites to segregate themselves away (it's kosher for Jews though). As the country becomes more non-White, it will become more difficult to escape the third worlding of this country unless you have wealth or power. The old White ethnic neighborhoods of yesteryear that provided community and safety for non-elites are now a forbidden dream.<br /><br />So why think about these issues? Because we're rationally analyzing the future of this country based on current trends and don't like what we see.<br /><br />We already have plenty of evidence in from many areas of the country, like California, Florida, Arizona, New York, with the following results: wire-pulling-elites-living-in-gated-communities-with-lots-of-wealth? life is goooood! middle-and-working-class? life is not so goooood!<br /><br />I personally get along well with foreigners and have always been interested in foreign cultures, languages and peoples. But in the same way that I respect those other groups and countries and don't think globalism should level all countries into controlled consumer cattle, or that the US should be imperialistically dictating to them, I respect my own nation and people and don't want to see it heavily colonized and transformed into something alien, particularly since this has been engineered very dishonestly. It's now "racist" to speak out against the transformation, while in 1965 it was promised that no such transformation would occur, in order to pass the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965">Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965</a>. Likewise with the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Reform_and_Control_Act_of_1986">Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986</a> where a "one-time" amnesty would be granted in exchange for future immigration control and border enforcement. They've lied through their teeth every time and deserve no more trust or credibility.<br /><br />An example of what our elites have planned for us comes from <a href="http://www.america2050.org/">america2050.org</a> which is sponsored by some left wing foundations, global corporations and the Jewish J.M. Kaplan Fund.<br /><br />Here's a <a href="http://www.america2050.org/about.html">quote</a>:<br /><blockquote><br />America 2050 is a national initiative to meet the infrastructure, economic development and environmental challenges of the nation <b>as we prepare to add about 130 million additional Americans by the year 2050.</b><br /><br />America 2050 is guided by the National Committee for America 2050, a coalition of regional planners, scholars, and policy-makers to develop a framework for the nation's future growth that considers trends such as: <br /><br /> * <b>Rapid population growth and demographic change</b><br /> * Global climate change<br /> * The rise in foreign trade <br /> * Sprawling and inefficient land use patterns<br /> * Uneven and inequitable growth within and between regions <br /> * Infrastructure systems that are reaching capacity<br /> * The emergence of megaregions <br /></blockquote><br />Look at the passion the Jewish <a href="http://www.jmkfund.org/">J.M. Kaplan Fund</a> has for <a href="http://www.jmkfund.org/grantprograms.html">"Migrations"</a>:<br /><blockquote><br />The Fund aims to support: a) comprehensive immigration policy reform for the United States; and b) the integration of immigrants into local and national communities. The former aim is pursued through grants for public education and advocacy. The latter is pursued by efforts, initiated by the Fund, to: bolster local immigrant-friendly policies and programs; highlight immigrant contributions to the commonweal; and establish, with the Migration Policy Institute, a new award – the E Pluribus Unum Prize – intended to honor government agencies, non-profit organizations, businesses, and individuals who have succeded in integrating recent immigrants and adding value to the larger community.<br /></blockquote><br />I wonder if the Kaplan family support the same policies for Israel that they do for the US? We've got plenty of third world non-Jews we could ship off to Israel so they too can enjoy the magically enriching benefits of diversity (Our Greatest Strength! TM) and marginalization within their own land.<br /><br /><h3><a name="comment2-2">Thread 2: Comment 2</a></h3><br />Obsidian,<br /><br />Thanks for your courteous reply. Let me answer your questions in two posts. Here's part one.<br /><br />I'd be interested in hearing your ideas and opinions about the content of my posts.<br /><br />I'm also curious if you believe our "civil society" is anti-White or not (e.g. Hollywood, mainstream media, academia, K12 education, government, etc)<br /><br />Let me answer your second question first. Freedom of association is being denied to Whites when they can't create and participate in ethnocentric organizations, either legally or through social sanction. For example, the typical university has dozens of ethnic organizations catering to Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Jews (as an ethnic group) and so on, but if Whites even establish non-racial organizations like <a href="http://www.westernyouth.org/">Youth for Western Civilization</a>, they are excoriated and shunned as racists and get their own <a href="http://vdare.com/cleburne/090408_splc.htm">$PLC</a> <a href="http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/02/26/white-nationalist-linked-right-wing-youth-group-debuts-at-cpac">bulletins</a>. Again, this is NOT a White group, but they are effectively treated as if they were and considered beyond the pale.<br /><br />So if Whites tried to establish White Engineers, White Student Association, White Lawyers, etc, they would be condemned as bigoted Nazis and their future career prospects harmed. Such are the blatant double standards governing our "civil society". Another example, in the House of Representatives, the Congressional Black Caucus has refused to seat White representatives who represent majority Black districts. Can you imagine our "civil society" approving of remotely similar behavior for any White group (such White groups aren't even allowed right now, meaning, they are technically legal, but anyone participating in an explicitly White ethnocentric organization is outcast as a racist Nazi, particularly by Jews, who have TONS of rabidly ethnocentric organziations for themselves)?<br /><br />Another facet to traditional freedom of association was the ability of neighborhoods to legally control their ethnic or racial composition. This was overturned in the 1960s and unscrupulous real estate moguls used these legal tools to destroy ethnic neighborhoods, while making handsome profits and ensuring a constant supply of new customers with Whites continually being pushed to new, temporarily safe, expensive areas. In many cases remaining Whites and their children would suffer violence as the neighborhoods deteriorated. Detroit is a classic, if extreme, example. "White flight" was really ethnic cleansing against Whites in many cases.<br /><br />You yourself have discussed the violent nature of Black urban areas in previous posts. Frankly many Whites want nothing to do with such environments. If a certain subgroup of Blacks prefer a thuggish and violent lifestyle, I'm OK with them pursuing such a life within their own spaces, but Whites, particularly non-elite, non-wealthy, Whites should also be allowed to pursue a healthy, safe environment for themselves and their families and defend their own spaces against violent aggression.<br /><br />The next facet of your point revolves around the replacement for traditional freedom of association by the new implicit freedom based on wealth. So wealthy people can escape to nice areas filled with nicer people (excepting the recent trend toward Section 8 housing that intermixes some of the thuggish subclasses into areas they otherwise couldn't afford, although they normally target the middle class and not the rich). California now has many gated communities for just this purpose, analogous to long standing Latin American patterns for separating the classes. These were unnecessary before our recent "enrichment" by diversity.<br /><br />So you are correct that since a larger number of Blacks are less wealthy, they are more limited in where they may live. It's not a legal restriction but an economic restriction that statistically affects Blacks more than most other populations.<br /><br />One reason Blacks have a bad reputation as a group is their tolerance and coddling of the thuggish subclass responsible for so much crime and violence. Most Black leadership defends and excuses their bad behavior instead of properly condemning it. I also believe a disturbing portion of the non-thuggish Black majority shares this attitude and sympathizes with them, at least when they're sticking it to Whitey. Given all the anti-White propaganda coursing through our popular culture, educational system and so on, it's not too surprising that so many Blacks have a lot of anti-White hostility.<br /><br /><h3><a name="comment2-3">Thread 2: Comment 3</a></h3><br />Obsidian,<br /><br />Here's part two dealing with your first question.<br /><br />The "short" answer for why Jews have both historically and currently are pushing so hard for third world immigration into America is that they consider this in their group interests. Professor Kevin MacDonald has documented in great detail in <a href="http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/books.htm">three books written during the 1990s</a>. They benefit while displacing their traditional competitors, Whites, who they distrust as potential Nazis. This is demonstrated by a notorious quote by Jewish activist Earl Raab, from <a href="http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/CofCchap7+Ref.pdf">Chapter 7</a> of "Culture of Critique"):<br /><blockquote><br />The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible—and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever.<br />(Earl Raab, Jewish Bulletin, 1993 February 19, 23)<br /></blockquote><br />They are benefiting by displacing the traditional WASP leadership of the country while they fit in as "White" even though they have a great deal of hostility for the traditional population, which is frequently masked euphemistically as contempt for "flyover country". Many Jewish commentators including David Gelernter, Ben Stein and Michael Medved have discussed this.<br /><br />An example of very disproportionally Jewish representation is their enrollment in top-tier universities, which then provide the most prestigious manpower for other elite institutions in government, media, academia, business, Wall Street, etc.<br /><br />Look at the numbers of Jews <a href="http://reformjudaismmag.org/_kd/Items/actions.cfm?action=Show&item_id=1278&destination=ShowItem">attending various elite universities</a>: <a href="http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Connelly-Harvard.html">THAT'S DISPROPORTIONATE</a>! Where's the liberal and diversicrat outrage for 2% of the population taking 38% of Northwestern, 33% of Washington University (St. Louis), 30% of Yale, 28% of the University of Pennsylvania, 25.5% of Harvard, 25% of Brown, Columbia and Cornell, 21% of NYU, 18.3% of Michigan, etc? (NOTE: <a href="http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/college/national-search">these are all outstanding schools</a> and <a href="http://www.hillel.org/HillelApps/JLOC/Search.aspx">nearly all outstanding schools have way more than 2% Jews</a>: do your own search: e.g. Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is about 10% Jewish as is UC Berkeley: Those are large campuses that are 5 times disproportionate). Since Jews are categorized as White it turns out that (non-Jewish) Whites are strongly underrepresented at many elite universities, if we want to follow the affirmative action bean counting so sacred to our "civil society".<br /><br />Of course, since Ashkenazi (European) Jews have an average IQ of around 110, it is to be expected that they will be somewhat overrepresented among the intellectual elites, but part of their disproportion also comes from ethnocentrism. For example, several years ago a study was done analyzing the citations of scientific papers and they discovered that Jewish authors tended to disproportionally cite other Jews and cite them more heavily, which could enhance their careers, since a major metric of academic success was how frequently your publications were cited.<br /><br />Historically Jews across the broad spectrum of beliefs and organizations were nearly universally supportive of scrapping the traditional immigration restrictions, like the national origin quota, while in modern times, it is still extremely popular, but some dissenters have appeared, mostly because they fear the impact of Muslim immigration.<br /><br />If not for the Jewish activism in promoting these policies, it never would've happened as thoroughly documented by <a href="http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/books.htm">Kevin MacDonald</a> in his The Culture of Critique with <a href="http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/CofCchap7+Ref.pdf">Chapter 7</a> focusing on their role in overturning the national origin quota in 1965.<br /><br />An excellent source for further exploring these issues is <a href="http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/index.html">The Occidental Observer</a> which contains many articles with copious links to additional sources of information. A basic philosophy of this site is that Whites should organize and behave ethnocentrically just as much as other groups, like Blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews, are allowed and encouraged too.<br /><br />Our civil society is now explicitly rejecting the color-blind society. For example, consider the many publically funded institutes at universities staffed by taxpayer-funded academics, like <a href="http://www.kirwaninstitute.org">The Kirwan Institute</a>.<br /><br />Here's <a href="http://www.kirwaninstitute.org/research/talking-about-race.php">a full quote for context with particularly interesting parts in bold</a>:<br /><blockquote><br />For some time now, the push for colorblind discourses, policies and practices around race and ethnicity in the United States has become more and more pronounced. Some justify this push with reference to the mistaken belief that nowadays racial identity has only marginal effects on a person's or group’s social interactions or access to social and economic opportunity. Some advocates for colorblindness go further: more than superfluous, they say, race talk of any kind is inherently divisive and pernicious.<br /><br />At Kirwan, we agree that all too often implicit and explicit race talk has indeed been used to divide and alienate. <b>At the same time, we believe colorblindness, though sometimes urged by people and organizations with the best intentions, is a mistake—one with profound consequences.</b> The critical question is not whether to use race, but how to talk about race in a variety of contexts. That question is an empirical one we engage in through a number of projects. In some cases we specifically examine how people talk about race and how such conversations impact their behavior. In other work we look at how issue "frames" operate. And in still other projects we look at the efficacy of using class-based or universal policy approaches to racial matters.<br /><br /><b>In the Diversity Advancement Project, for example, the Institute is collaborating with the Center for Social Inclusion to develop strategies to increase public support for racial, ethnic and gender diversity in our public and private institutions.</b> Our project on Democratic Merit aims to push colleges and universities toward greater investment in those communities and students whose success is needed to enhance the health and strength of our multiracial democracy. <b>And in our projects on African American-Immigrant coalition building, we work to understand the conditions and contexts that facilitate constructive, institutionalized relationships across lines of race and nativity, and those that tend to undermine or preclude such relationships.</b><br /><br />It is impossible to quickly summarize all of this work, much of it ongoing. <b>What we can say is that context, audience, and environment all matter in determining how best to promote racial justice. We can also say that, drawing on our own efforts and those of numerous colleagues and experts, we expect to make steady progress toward agreement on how the findings of this growing field can usefully shape our collective social justice advocacy and activist practice.</b><br /></blockquote><br />Note that brazen advocacy and politics is pursued at an academic institution funded with public money and this is only one of many. <a href="http://www.newracialstudies.ucsb.edu/intro">Here's another one that also lists further such scams</a>.<br /><br />Of course for all their happy academic talk about "context", their idea of fairness and balance is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiteness_studies">Whiteness Studies</a>, which is a direct attack on Whites, our identity, history, traditions and peoplehood, in constrast to EVERY other ethnic studies, which openly advocate for their ethnic group.<br /><br />Consider one of the flagships of the Whiteness Studies movement, <a href="http://racetraitor.org/">racetraitor.org</a>:<br /><blockquote><br />The white race is a historically constructed social formation. It consists of all those who partake of the privileges of the white skin in this society. Its most wretched members share a status higher, in certain respects, than that of the most exalted persons excluded from it, in return for which they give their support to a system that degrades them.<br /><br /><b>The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race, which means no more and no less than abolishing the privileges of the white skin.</b> Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue, domestic and foreign, in US society.<br /><br />The existence of the white race depends on the willingness of those assigned to it to place their racial interests above class, gender, or any other interests they hold. The defection of enough of its members to make it unreliable as a predictor of behavior will lead to its collapse.<br /><br />RACE TRAITOR aims to serve as an intellectual center for those seeking to abolish the white race. It will encourage dissent from the conformity that maintains it and popularize examples of defection from its ranks, analyze the forces that hold it together and those that promise to tear it apart. Part of its task will be to promote debate among abolitionists. When possible, it will support practical measures, guided by the principle, <b>Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.</b><br /><br />The editors publish things in RACE TRAITOR because they think that publishing them will help build a community of readers. Editorial opinions are expressed in editorials and unsigned replies to letters. <br /></blockquote><br />Yeah, right. "White trash" shares a more exalted status than Oprah, Chris Rock, Michael Jordon, Colin Powell or Barack Obama.<br /><br />I don't see these academics ferociously calling on anyone to smash the Black race, which they would do if they were logically consistent. Likewise, Jews are much more successful than Whites (and, by transitivity, vastly more so than Blacks), yet I don't see any of them trying to deconstruct Jewishness or dismantle Jewish privilege.<br /><br />F*** them and their double standards and hypocrisy.<br /><br />Kevin MacDonald documents how substantial Jewish influence was mostly responsible for these "cultures of critique" (of Whites).<br /><br /><h3><a name="comment2-4">Thread 2: Comment 4</a></h3><br />@chicnoir<br /><br />You're correct that such national-origin organizations are permissible. But most American Whites have ancestors from many different European countries. Many government and corporate forms, including for new jobs, ask me if I'm "white", not of Irish or German descent. And since White people are demonized by Hollywood and our media and legally discriminated against by our government, this only strengthens our pan-European identity as Whites.<br /><br />Some Jews argue that the Palestinian people don't really exist because they supposedly don't have a historic existence. Well, given their treatment over the last 120 years by Zionists, even if they didn't really exist two centuries ago, they sure do now.<br /><br />The existence of White identity is much, much older than the anti-White leftists claim, as discussed in the comments on <a href="http://age-of-treason.blogspot.com/2009/03/whose-country-is-this-anyway.html#7443157693542194642">this thread</a>. A few more comments down from this one, I give some excerpts and some google book searches anyone can run to see some proof.<br /><br />If the pan-African Black identity is "celebrated", then White should be too.<br /><br />Likewise given a Jewish identity encompassing Mizrahis, Ashkenazis, athiests, Buddhists (still considered Jews) and the full spectrum of Jewish religious belief from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconstructionist_Judaism">Reconstructionist</a> to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haredi_Judaism">Haredi</a> Jews.<br /><br />Likewise for creating a synthetic "Asian" identity for American consumption. In Asia, they consider themselves Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese, Filipino, etc, first, second and third over pan-Asian.<br /><br />The key insight that killed my lifelong belief in the color-blind society was that the left, as it takes over our "civil society", is motivated by hatred of Whites instead of love of non-Whites, and this is reflected in the increasing anti-White policies, rhetoric and ideology. The color-blind rhetoric was just a tool to dispossess Whites of their traditional society and as we are marginalized, ethnic politics will likely rule the day and Whites will be a hated scapegoat class, similar to the kulaks <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html">genocided in the millions by Stalinist Jews in the 1930s</a>.ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-9582970734152053452009-04-12T05:00:00.007-04:002009-04-12T09:20:41.211-04:00Illegal Alien Amnesty: The Last StrawThe New York Times is reporting that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/us/politics/09immig.html?_r=1&hp">Obama wants to legalize the current hoard of illegals</a> in this country by pushing legislation through Congress this fall. Naturally, they're promising to enforce the border and require employers to check that new employees are legal. Gee that sounds familiar... Oh yeah, they promised they'd do both of these things to pass <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Reform_and_Control_Act_of_1986">the "one-time" amnesty in 1986</a>.<br /><br />How well did that turn out again?<br /><br />Of course, they followed this "one time" amnesty with a <a href="http://www.numbersusa.com/content/issues/amnesty.html">whole sequence of one-off amnesties</a>, 500,000, here, a million, there, with NO ENFORCEMENT except a few token scraps on occasion for the cameras. <a href="http://www.cis.org/ImmigrationHistory">Here's more history.</a><br /><br />When selling IRCA in 1986, they claimed there were around one million illegals, but they ended up legalizing 2.7 million at that time AND another 400,000 in a subsequent amnesty in 2000 for those who complained they were improperly excluded from the 1986 amnesty. How many of these 3.1 million have used family unification to legalize additional millions of immigrants? This time Obama is throwing around the ridiculous 12 million illegal figure that hasn't changed for years, even though the actual number is likely at least twenty million and perhaps even over 30 million.<br /><br />The pack of lies continues.<br /><br />I think this amnesty would be the last straw.<br /><br />If amnesty passes, the last shred of legitimacy in the federal government will finally snap. The Constitution is essentially dead letter with activist judges, bureaucrats, legal scholars and activists evicerating the traditional understanding of objective law by bending it to their will using <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=TucYAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA132&dq=%22Humpty+Dumpty+said+in+a+rather+scornful+tone%22">postmodern sophistry like Humpty Dumpty</a>:<br /><blockquote><style type="text/css">.nobrtable br {display:none}</style><div class="nobrtable"><br /> <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><br /> <tr><td>"When <i>I</i> use a word," Humpty Dumpty said in a rather scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean--neither more nor less."</td></tr><br /> <tr><td>"The question is," said Alice, "whether you <i>can</i> make words mean so many different things."</td></tr><br /> <tr><td>"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master--that's all."</td></tr></table></div></blockquote>We have the illusion of continuing our historic Republic, but, in actuality, a critical core has been replaced by elite betrayal, Cultural Marxism, non-White supremacism, particularly Black and Jewish, corporatism, corruption and raw anti-White ethnic politics, which all act against non-elite Whites and our descendants.<br /><br />The system is seriously broken and there doesn't seem much chance is reforming it.<br /><br />As I've partially discussed in past posts and intend to discuss in the future, the US has become structurally anti-White in all the major institutions of "civil society" (media, Hollywood, advertising, K12 education, academia, law, corporations, government, wealthy foundations, organized religion, etc). Immigrants with no history in this country immediately benefit from affirmative action that explicitly discriminates against Whites. As an added bonus, Whites get to subsidize their displacement by non-White aliens through high taxes. But this isn't good enough for the White-hating leftists pushing for even more anti-White hatred, vilification and discrimination. The lower we fall, the more they want to kick us in the head, stomach and family jewels. It is staggering how much more overt and vicious anti-White hatred has become over the last twenty-five years. If we don't start fighting back, it will get a lot worse.<br /><br />If amnesty passes, we need to stop supporting the current regime, and strategize how we can intelligently perform mass civil disobedience and weaken its perceived legitimacy. Regardless of the result of the push for amnesty, we need to begin seriously subverting the institutions that are destroying this country and colonizing it with armies of aliens. Concomitantly, we must be build a wide constellation of alternative groups and organizations that can wean both our average and elite citizens away from the pernicious control mechanisms used to turn them against their interests (media, Hollywood, K12 education, universities, corporations, etc), or at least give a significant fraction the awareness and tools for resisting much of that control.<br /><br />It is critical that we have many different, independent movements and organizations that cover a broad spectrum of beliefs. Obsessing about ideological purity hurts our broader cause. We need to build bridges to our misguided kin and sympathetic non-Whites. Likewise, we need to defend the rights of our more extreme brethren and encourage others to genuinely try to understand their perspective. We must break the leftist and Jewish (see Neocons and Lawrence Auster) strategem of manipulating Whites into condemning those further to their right. More on this later.<br /><br />When I say "this country", I mean what really matters: our traditional population and its culture, history, values and character that make us distinctive, not some abstract, universal ideology making us easy pickings for our elite overlords, particularly the Jewish ones, who advocate diametrically opposed policies for Israel. An outrage of modern America is that our healthy patriotism has been harnessed by our enemies to manipulate many Whites into supporting causes directly against their interests, like Neocon imperialism, American exceptionalism hubris, proposition nation ideology, anti-White discrimination, among others.<br /><br />I plan to discuss relations between non-elite Whites and other groups, like elite Whites, Jews, Blacks, Hispanics, Asians and so on in more detail later, as well as the fact that we must try to understand why some Whites have been co-opted to anti-White activism. One critical point: we must try to understand how they see the world, why they think their policies are highly moral and we must provide intellectually and morally persuasive arguments to rebut their strongest arguments while explaining our vision effectively.<br /><br />One example of an anti-White institution is the Roman Catholic Church, which, for the last few decades, has relentlessly pushed open borders, propagandized its parishioners and transferred massive wealth from White members to illegal aliens and refugees, among others. A lot of Catholics aren't happy about this and some have voted with their feet by leaving the Church. A more constructive response is to start organizing, speaking out and talking with little old Catholic ladies, who normally leave lots of money to the Church, to educate them on how the Church has betrayed this country, its citizens and the Church's legacy. This isn't the Church of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulton_J._Sheen">Bishop Fulton J. Sheen</a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Coughlin">Father Charles Coughlin</a>. The Church would likely "rediscover its patriotism" if Whitey stopped paying the bills, or at least it might split into traditionalist versus social justice factions. Some rural parishes aren't getting the wall-to-wall indoctrination like the urban ones, so if they had more awareness of the problem, they could apply more pressure. Another approach is to pursuade millions of Catholics to convert to various Orthodox faiths that aren't agitating for the destruction of our country and people. A good chunk of illegal alien Hispanics go to church just to get free goodies and won't be contributing all that much to the Church's wealth in the future.<br /><br />Similar efforts should be made in other churches fed up with the leftists gutting or inverting traditional beliefs in favor of "social justice". And the traditionalist dissenters shouldn't slink out quietly, but forcefully litigate to receive their fair share of church assets and property if the leftists don't want to share equitably.<br /><br />Likewise for the rest of our "civil society" institutions now in thrall to evil or corrupt elites. More on this later.<br /><br />The decline also reflects the cultural and moral decline of our mass population over the last half century. If we create alternatives to our current "civil society" institutions, we can reverse this decline, at least for a portion of our population.<br /><br />If amnesty passes, I think the best we can likely hope for will be to break this country up into pieces, leaving those parts heavily populated by SWPLs, aliens, Jews and thuggish minorities the freedom to create their multicultural utopia, attempt to continue the American Empire for Israel and rabidly promote gay marriage, group marriage, child marriage, animal marriage, and whatever else they claim are inalienable human rights that are intuitively obvious to everyone decent. Whatever dudes. Nice knowin' ya.<br /><br /> To be clear I believe there is a small but important subset of certain minorities that is thuggish. A major modern corruption is that the ethnic leadership and a disturbingly large portion of the average folks within those minorities defend and excuse the thugs' atrocious behavior instead of anathamatizing it like Whites do for their own much smaller population of thugs. It's an important piece of evidence that they're behaving very ethnocentrically and we'd better behave likewise.<br /><br />The more traditional parts of America can create a new and improved Constitution(s) that try to fix the fatal flaws of our current one and have more cohesive populations. By breaking up the country, we'll allow regional diversity where San Francisco can really step on the gas pursuing their philosophy to its logical conclusions without any concern for the "prudes" in Oklahoma. More power to 'em. I think it would be highly instructive for the survivors.<br /><br />Roughly speaking we would break between the red states and the blue states, although there is no reason to preserve existing state boundaries, when many states have polarized subregions. There would be complications in handling a variety a urban areas, like Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland and so on, but in some cases they could have a good chunk of their metropolitian statistical areas and some countryside for additional growth while in others they might contain a much broader local region. The predominant population and values of the local community could determine the choices. I would anticipate some migrations between different regions by people wanting to live in an environment friendly to their values, culture, ethnic group or other interests.<br /><br />There are many ways to partition the country and different approaches to how they would interrelate or not. To list just a few possibilities:<ul><li>Articles of Conferation style weak central government with more powers devolved to the states, including some states banding together to enforce common secured borders</li><br /> <li>Breakup into several smaller independent countries, from two or three to twenty or thirty</li><br /><ul><li> Varying levels of cooperation between countries, e.g. economies, transportation, R&D, etc.</li><br /> <li> Different countries could have different Constitutions and follow different values and policies.<br /> <br/>For example, some could be ethnic nations, while others could be multiracial. The ethnic nations probably wouldn't be 100% pure, so much as overwhelming controlled by one ethnic group, and preferring to remain that way through strong control of the border and interior.</li><br /> <li> Some ethnic states may choose to limit Jews so their own population could lead and develop its own culture and institutions without being displaced by this high-performance, highly ethnocentric elite, just like Black nationalist states would likely choose to limit the role of Whites so Blacks would occupy most of the leadership and elite positions. Other states would likely be dominated by Jews as the elites or crypto-elites, so they would still have plenty of places to flourish. </li><br /> <li> Many details would need to be negotiated to disentangle existing commitments and allowing reasonably efficient transportation (this is secondary to sovereignty though) </li></ul></ul>There are many ideas related to breaking the US into more manageable parts and the notion is gaining momentum. It may also be possible to accomplish the division in a fairly civilized manner. Some models for the subsequent inter-American relationships would be the traditional American-Canadian relationship or the pre-EU modern Europe, where national borders were enforced but substantial interaction and trade still flourished. For this to become a reality, there must be many people exploring and developing many concrete ideas that can then be promoted among various segments of our population. More on this later.<br /><br />Most Americans did not sign up for this highly risky social experiment that involves massively colonizing our country with low social capital or incompatible aliens. And frankly, even if some of the immigrants are great people with high abilities, like some Asians and even Africans (I know some professional <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igbo_people">Igbo</a> that are impressive, including having very high marriage rates), why should our homelands be colonized, while their homelands remain ethnic strongholds. The con game is that pretty much ONLY Whites are being colonized.<br /><br />If the elites think it's such a great idea, why don't we partition the country and try the experiment for fifty or one hundred years in perhaps 30% to 40% of the country and assess the results before committing the entire country. This is simple risk management.<br /><br />Even worse, pretty much every White homeland in the world is simultaneously engaging in the same risky, essentially irreversible experiment. Whites need to wake up and take back at least a portion of our homelands for ourselves and our descendants. Sure, some Whites are culturally and racially suicidal. That's their right. But it's time the rest of us escape their insane gamble that will likely fail spectacularly with dire results for our people, forever.ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com21tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-20137517787635761122009-04-04T19:14:00.011-04:002009-04-07T02:27:55.097-04:00Anti-White Bias: University ScholarshipsThis post supplements: <a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/03/debunking-one-million-white-ethnic.html"><span style="font-style: italic;">Debunking "One Million White Ethnic Scholarships ..." by Chris de Morsella</span></a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.blackexcel.org/link4.htm">Blacks</a>, <a href="http://www.apiasf.org/">Asians</a>, <a href="http://www.hsf.net/">Hispanics</a> and other non-Whites receive many racially-oriented scholarships without stigma. Searching for "<a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=black+scholarships">Black Scholarships</a>" or "<a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=african+american+scholarships">African American Scholarships</a>" yields many sites that provide real scholarships or tell how to get them. The same is true for "<a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=hispanic+scholarships">Hispanic Scholarships</a>", "<a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=asian+scholarships">Asian Scholarships</a>" and "<a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=jewish+scholarships">Jewish Scholarships</a>". Look at the huge list of large corporate donors for just <a href="http://www.hsf.net/Donors.aspx?id=1642">one source</a> of Hispanic scholarships (<a href="http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/2009/2/17/more_than_2_million_in_college.htm">here's a separate large source</a>).<br /><br />Yet searching for "<a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=white+scholarships">White Scholarships</a>" or "<a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=caucasian+scholarships">Caucasian Scholarships</a>" yields <span style="font-style: italic;">very few </span>hits for getting scholarships. Many of the hits are people questioning whether any exist and how to get them if they do exist. Other hits are for scholarships where the family name "White" is part of the scholarship's name, like "Wayne F. White Scholarships". The <a href="http://www.collegescholarships.org/scholarships/white-scholarship-guide.htm">first and only link</a> on the first page discusses White scholarships as pretty much being limited to some scholarships for Whites to attend public Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBSUs) that want to increase diversity for legal reasons since they're overwhelmingly Black.<br /><br />The second results page contained <a href="http://www.nextstudent.com/directory-of-scholarships/Racial/0004/Racial-Caucasian-scholarships.aspx">another link</a> listing a few actual White scholarships which I analyzed in detail in my previous post. As I discussed <a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/03/debunking-one-million-white-ethnic.html">in my previous post</a>, almost no White racial scholarships exist while the ethnic White scholarships that do exist are NOT racial scholarships but only require ethnic ancestry that some non-Whites can also claim: e.g. 1/4 Italian or 1/8 Polish. There was also <a href="http://voice-of-deseret.blogspot.com/2009/02/racial-and-ethnic-scholarships.html">one link by an explicit White advocacy group</a> but it appears to be very small and apply to youth education unless they're misusing the word "secondary education".<br /><br />Many other hits related to a few provocative attempts to create tiny, token White-only scholarships, like this ABC News story: <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/us/story?id=2674267&page=1"><span style="font-style: italic;">Whites Only Scholarship Creates Outrage</span></a> about the controversial attempt by the College Republicans of Boston University in 2006 to establish a one-time $250 scholarship for someone at least 1/4 White. Naturally the politically correct, multicultural crowd <a href="http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=515961">were</a> <a href="http://www.dailycardinal.com/article/4493">outraged</a>.<br /><br />From the Harvard Crimson article above (emphasis mine): <blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;">But in interviews last night, several Harvard students said that the Caucasian-only scholarship was divisive.</span><span style="font-style: italic;"><br /><br /></span><span style="font-style: italic;">“An act such as this is probably not going to help people on the other side of the table understand where the BU Republicans are coming from,” said Jason C. B. Lee ’08, president of the Harvard Black Students Association. “We’re open to discussion, but we think <span style="font-weight: bold;">it should be done in a less inflammatory way</span>.”<br /><br /></span><span style="font-style: italic;">Leaders of Harvard’s political community agreed, criticizing the means used by the BU Republicans.<br /><br /></span><span style="font-style: italic;">“If they want to have a serious debate about affirmative action, that’s one thing,” said Eric P. Lesser ’07, former president of the Harvard College Democrats. “But if they want to resort to these gimmicks, then <span style="font-weight: bold;">that’s despicable.</span>”</span><span style="font-style: italic;"><br /><br /></span><span style="font-style: italic;">“The statement they’re making is worthwhile,” said Mark A. Shepard ’08, the former vice president of the Harvard College Republicans, “but they are themselves engaging in discrimination to protest discrimination.”<br /><br /></span><span style="font-style: italic;">“This idea is completely ridiculous,” Vijay G. Warrier ’09 said. “But if this scholarship is awarded, Indian-Americans should be allowed to apply because any reasonable usage of the term ‘Caucasian’ would include most Indians.” </span></blockquote>All this outrage for a measly little $250 scholarship for someone who only has to be 1/4 White! The Black Student President thinks establishing a tiny scholarship for someone that is only 1/4 White is inflammatory? Wow. There are probably at least tens of millions of dollars per year in scholarships and grants ONLY for Blacks and it is "inflammatory" of Whites to create ANY vaguely White-based scholarship (1/4 White is not very restrictive)?<br /><br />I'll take double standards for $1000, <a href="http://www.sonypictures.com/tv/shows/jeopardy/">Alex</a>.<br /><br />There was a <a href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/221432/no_special_scholarships_for_white_heterosexual.html?cat=4">similar</a> <a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/119939.html">incident</a> <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&as_q=white+heterosexual+male+scholarship&as_epq=college+republicans&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=50&lr=&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ramcigar.com&as_qdr=all&as_rights=&as_occt=any&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&safe=images">at the</a> University of Rhode Island in 2006-2007 where the College Republicans ran an ad for a $100 scholarship and the Student Organizations Advisory and Review Committee tried to derecognize the College Republicans. The commissars only backed down when they came under public scrutiny by the national group <a href="http://www.thefire.org/">FIRE</a> (Foundation for Individual Rights in Education).<br /><br />This outrage at creating token White racial scholarships while ANY non-White racial or crypto-racial scholarships are encouraged is a ridiculous double standard that Whites should stop tolerating. Expose the one-way Color Blind Con Game (TM) to your friends and family! Discussion among ourselves is an important first step in breaking the power of our corrupt anti-White "civil society". We need to be pragmatic in recognizing that various people are at different levels of receptiveness, so our advocacy needs to be thoughtful targeted to each audience based on how much reality they can handle at that time. More on this in a future post.<br /><br />It's time for Whites to advocate for themselves EXACTLY the same way that Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Jews and anybody but "hideous Whites" gets to do now. It's only fair.<br /><br />We don't have much time left to fix our country because the demographics are going to be locked in soon. Once that happens, our options narrow considerably and the chance of serious ugliness increases. This topic requires more elaboration in a future post.<br /><br />Probably the best we can hope for over the next three years is to prevent an illegal immigration amnesty and begin creating and strengthening alternative institutions to displace the societal control mechanisms that mentally enslave Whites directly against their interests (media, Hollywood, K12 education, higher education, advertising, etc). Again, more on this later.<br /><br />Of course some of our strongest opponents are deracinated, leftist Whites and <a href="http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.com/">SWPL</a> Whites. Special care needs to be taken convert more of our cognitive elites out of this subculture and to weaken its allure for our talented youth. Again, further thoughts in a future post.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Update: 2009-04-05:</span><br /><br />It goes without saying one of our strongest opponents are a significant portion of the Jewish community, most of their organizations and many of their powerful members embedded in our elites. They have been and are strongly opposed to Whites pursuing ethnocentrism the way they rabidly do. See my <a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/02/original-giant-post.html">Original Giant Post</a> for my take on this with lots-o-links.<br /><br />An interesting source discussing Jewish ethnocentrism is Israel Shahak's "Jewish History, Jewish Religion" which appears to be <a href="http://www.radioislam.net/historia/shahak/english.htm">fully available here</a>.ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-91596644764966531982009-03-19T02:00:00.011-04:002009-06-01T02:58:17.672-04:00Debunking "One Million White Ethnic Scholarships ..." by Chris de MorsellaAs I write this, the fourth result of googling for "<a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=white+scholarships">White Scholarships</a>" is the article: <a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.multiculturaladvantage.com/opportunity/scholarships/diversity/bias/White-Ethnic-Scholarships-Dont-Trouble-Student-Group-Protesting-Minority-Scholarships.asp">One Million White Ethnic Scholarships Don’t Trouble Student Group Protesting Minority Scholarships</a> by Chris de Morsella. This article is so deceptive and dishonest I feel compelled to correct the record by analyzing its claims in detail.<br /><br />I'm planning on following up this post with a general discussion of racial and ethnic scholarships and their current anti-White bias, and will <a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/04/anti-white-bias-university-scholarships.html">link it here when complete</a>.<br /><br />Here's the content of Mr. de Morsella's article with some comments and analysis interspersed:<br /><ul><li>bold emphasis is mine</li><li>the strange layout of the first paragraph follows the original article's format (I believe it to be a formatting error):<br /></li></ul><blockquote style="font-style: italic;"><p style="margin-bottom: 0pt; padding-bottom: 0pt;">The Daily Free Press, the student newspaper at Boston University, recently ran</p> <table style="border: 0pt none ; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; border-collapse: collapse;"> <tbody><tr valign="top"> <td> <!-- [BEGIN] AD COPY --> <div class="adv" align="center"> <script type="text/javascript"><!-- google_ad_client = "pub-1444293225920212"; google_ad_width = 300; google_ad_height = 250; google_ad_format = "300x250_as"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_ad_channel = "3821059650"; google_color_border = "FFFFFF"; google_color_bg = "FFFFFF"; google_color_link = "990000"; google_color_url = "CC0000"; google_color_text = "000000"; //--></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="file:///C:/Users/jere/Documents/web/White%20Scholarships/White-Ethnic-Scholarships-Dont-Trouble-Student-Group-Protesting-Minority-Scholarships.asp_files/show_ads.js"></script> </div> </td> <td style="font-style: italic;"> <p style="margin-top: 0pt;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfreepress.com/media/storage/paper87/news/2006/11/21/News/Bu.Group.Offers.White.Scholarship-2505837.shtml?norewrite200611291414&sourcedomain=www.dailyfreepress.com"> </a></p><blockquote><p style="margin-top: 0pt;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfreepress.com/media/storage/paper87/news/2006/11/21/News/Bu.Group.Offers.White.Scholarship-2505837.shtml?norewrite200611291414&sourcedomain=www.dailyfreepress.com">an article covering the activities of a Republican student group</a> that was seeking to draw attention to what they call the “worst form of bigotry confronting America today,” Boston University’s College Republicans are circulating an application for a “Caucasian Achievement and Recognition Scholarship” that requires applicants be at least 25 percent Caucasian.</p> <p>Joe Mroszczyk president of the student group, Boston University College Republicans, told the college's BU Today Web</p></blockquote><p></p> </td> </tr> </tbody></table> <p style="margin-top: 0pt;">site "<a href="http://www.bu.edu/phpbin/news-cms/news/?dept=4&id=41878&template=4" target="_blank"> We think giving out a scholarship based on any race is crazy</a>" I would ask Joe is it “crazy” only when the targeted ethnic groups are people of color? To expose the <span style="font-weight: bold;">glaring hypocrisy and double standards</span> that Joe is <span style="font-weight: bold;">self-righteously</span> engaging in I did a quick Internet search on various “white” ethnic scholarship search terms and got large number of hits. If Joe is so opposed to scholarships that have an ethnic focus, I would suggest he include in his noble crusade ethnic scholarships for students from the following ethnicities as well:</p> <p>Number of returned results on Google for the following searches:</p> <ul><li> Polish-American scholarships ~ 57,100 </li><li> Irish American scholarships ~ 131,000 </li><li> Italian American scholarships ~ 223,000 </li><li> Jewish scholarships ~ 808,000 </li><li> German American scholarships ~ 142,000<table style="border: 0pt none ; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; border-collapse: collapse;"> <tbody><tr valign="top"> <td> <!-- [BEGIN] AD COPY --> <div class="adv" align="center"> <script type="text/javascript"><!-- google_ad_client = "pub-1444293225920212"; google_ad_width = 300; google_ad_height = 250; google_ad_format = "300x250_as"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_ad_channel = "3821059650"; google_color_border = "FFFFFF"; google_color_bg = "FFFFFF"; google_color_link = "990000"; google_color_url = "CC0000"; google_color_text = "000000"; //--></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="file:///C:/Users/jere/Documents/web/White%20Scholarships/White-Ethnic-Scholarships-Dont-Trouble-Student-Group-Protesting-Minority-Scholarships.asp_files/show_ads.js"></script> </div> </td></tr></tbody></table></li></ul></blockquote><table style="border: 0pt none ; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; border-collapse: collapse;"><tbody><tr valign="top"><blockquote> </blockquote></tr></tbody></table>So Mr. de Morsella claims that the number of google search results corresponds to the number of scholarships! Note the title of his essay: "<span style="font-style: italic;">One Million White Ethnic Scholarships...</span>" and these numbers, like 808,000, are the source of his "million" White scholarships!<br /><br />I've done the following google searches in early March 2009. Mr. de Morsella's article was published in 2006.<br /><br />for <a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=polish+american+scholarships&fp=Sogw2xyoDN8">polish american scholarships</a>: (no quotes): 143,000 hits [2006 article: 57,100 hits]<br />for <a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=italian+american+scholarships&fp=Sogw2xyoDN8">Italian American Scholarships</a> (no quotes): 322,000 hits [2006 article: 223,000]<br />for "<a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=%22italian+american+scholarships%22&fp=Sogw2xyoDN8">Italian American Scholarships</a>" (with quotes): 1660 hits<br /><br />So clearly Mr. de Morsella was NOT using quotes in his google search three years ago, since the quoted results yields so few hits.<br /><br />for <a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=black+OR+%22african+american%22+scholarships&fp=Sogw2xyoDN8">black or african american scholarships</a>: 1,200,000 hits<br /><br />In the interests of more diverse diversity, let's use Mr. de Morsella's "methodology" to look for some more scholarship categories :<br /><br />for <a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=martian+american+scholarships">martian american scholarships</a>: 9,300 hits<br /><br />Hey, not too shabby. I expected there to be ZERO scholarships for Martian-Americans, but according to Mr. de Morsella's "methodology", there are nearly TEN THOUSAND!!!<br /><br />for <a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=martian+scholarships">martian scholarships</a> : 32,800 hits (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvin_the_martian">Marvin</a> will be happy since he is NOT an American)<br />for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&as_qdr=all&q=porno+scholarships">porno scholarships</a>: 199,000 hits (teenage interest in college just shot up over 50%!)<br />for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&as_qdr=all&q=pencil+scholarships">pencil scholarships</a>: 244,000 hits<br /><br />One QUARTER OF A MILLION scholarships JUST for PENCILS!!! My Number Two pencils have just left for a pub crawl to celebrate their good fortune!<br /><br />for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&as_qdr=all&q=desk+scholarships">desk scholarships</a>: 1,030,000 hits<br /><br />OVER A MILLION!!! I just sent my desk to catch up with my pencils!<br /><br />Wow. So far I've found OVER ONE AND HALF MILLION scholarships and although I should probably keep looking to help populate safe educational spaces with a rich tapestry of oppressed and underrepresented communities (many Pencil Americans are brutalized every day. SNAP!), I'll leave further discoveries to others so I can get this post out the door.<br /><p></p><p style="font-style: italic;"></p><blockquote><p style="font-style: italic;">In order to further illustrate the <span style="font-weight: bold;">gross hypocrisy</span> that underlies the <span style="font-weight: bold;">incendiary claims</span> made by Mr. Mroszczyk, I have compiled a small sampling of the plethora of white ethnic scholarships.</p> </blockquote>Note the continuing demonization of Mr. Mroszczyk, the College Republican. Mr. de Morsella is perfectly willing to stridently and, I believe, unfairly, attack the motives and character of those who disagree with him. He continues this throughout the rest of the article as you will see below.<blockquote style="font-style: italic;"><a href="http://www.multiculturaladvantage.com/opportunity/scholarships/diversity/ehtnic-white-scholarships.asp" style="padding-left: 6px;">Click here to view a sampling of white/ethnic scholarships.</a></blockquote>I will now list the full contents of this page here. The rest of the original post will resume below.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">BEGINNING OF SAMPLING PAGE. ORIGINAL POST INTERRUPTED.</span><br /><span style="font-style: italic;"></span><blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;">Partial List of Scholarships for White Americans</span><br /><p style="font-style: italic;">The following is a short assortment of scholarships with a white ethnic focus. This is a casual compilation intended to demonstrate the wide availability of scholarships that are tailored and targeted for white students based on their ethnic origin. There are literally many hundreds of thousands and perhaps many millions of scholarships like these that are available for students with various white ethnic origins.</p><p></p></blockquote><blockquote><p style="font-style: italic;"><span class="label">It is not a comment against these types of scholarships!</span> ~ In fact, this web site sees nothing wrong with ethnicity being a criteria for some scholarships, including scholarships that are geared towards various white ethnic groups.</p><p></p></blockquote><p>In fact, Mr. de Morsella's comrades have a HUGE problem with the existence of White scholarships. I will analyze this in more detail in my upcoming post which <a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/04/anti-white-bias-university-scholarships.html">I will link here</a>. Here's an <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=2674267&page=1">article that demonstrates the controversy</a>. Of course, Mr. de Morsella's original post was in response to this exact story.<br /></p> <p style="font-style: italic;"></p><blockquote><p style="font-style: italic;">By the same token, we also see nothing wrong in scholarships that are geared towards non-white ethnic groups and other diverse groups such as woman, GLBT, national origin, age, veteran, language speakers, people with disabilities, geographical area etc.</p> <p style="font-style: italic;">Given the fact of the wide availability of white/ethnic scholarships <span style="font-weight: bold;">we seriously question the motives of those who are so loudly outraged</span> at scholarships with a non-white minority focus.</p><p></p></blockquote><p>I dispute the "wide availability of white/ethnic scholarships". Much of the rest of this post will analyze this in more detail, including Mr. de Morsella's supposed evidence below.<br /></p> <p style="font-style: italic;" align="center"></p><blockquote><p style="font-style: italic;" align="center">~~~</p> <ul style="font-style: italic;"><li>Pulaski Merit Scholarships - Polish</li><li>Abraham Fellowship - <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span></li><li>Mitchell Scholarships - Irish</li><li>Irish American Scholarship Fund</li><li>UWM Polish-American Scholarship</li><li>Association of Italian American Charities Dr. Frank C. Marino Memorial Scholarship</li><li>Polish-American FREEDOM FOUNDATION Lane Kirkland Scholarship Program</li><li>Trans-Canada Alliance of German-Canadians - Scholarship</li><li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish </span>War Veterans National Scholarship Program</li><li>Walter N. and Frances Hnatiuk Scholarship - Ukranian</li><li>The Kosciuszko Foundation's Tuition Scholarships for Polish Americans</li><li>Marinelli Scholarship - Italian</li><li>Irish-American Scholars Program</li><li>Starkoff Fellowship- <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span></li><li>Polish-American Congress Scholarship</li><li>Augustus Society Italian Scholarships</li><li>Kosciuszko Foundation Tuition Scholarship - Polish</li><li>Deutscher Brüderliche Bund Scholarship - German</li><li>Petryshyn Memorial Scholarship - Ukranian</li><li>Norman R. Peterson Italian Scholarship</li><li>Ethel Marcus Memorial Fellowship - <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span></li><li>Polish Scholarship Fund, Inc.</li><li>National Italian American Foundation Assunta Luchetti Martino </li><li>Scholarship for International Studies</li><li>Anna and Charles Stockwitz Fund - <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span></li><li>Charles and Louise Rosenbaum Scholarship Loan Fund - <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span></li><li><span style="font-weight: bold;">B'nai Brith</span> Women of Greater Hartford Scholarship</li><li>Massachusetts Federation of Polish Women's Clubs Scholarships</li><li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span> Social Service Agency of Metropolitan Washington</li><li>Levie Educational Fund Scholarship - <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span></li><li>American Council for Polish Culture Scholarship Challenge Grant</li><li>George L. Graziado Fellowship for Business - Italian</li><li>Marcus and Theresa Levie Educational Fund - <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span></li><li>The Roothbert Fund - <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span></li><li>Polish American Club Scholarship</li><li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span> Foundation for Education of Women Scholarship</li><li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span> War Veterans of the USA - Scholarship</li><li>National Italian American Foundation George L. Graziado Fellowship for Business</li><li>National Italian American Foundation Merrill Lynch Scholarship</li><li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span> Welfare Board Scholarship</li><li>Amelia Greenbaum Scholarship Fund - <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span></li><li>National Italian American Foundation National Italian American Foundation</li><li>National Italian American Foundation Alexander Defilippis Scholarship</li><li>Encouragement Scholarship -<span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span></li><li>Vincent Viceglia Fellowship- Italian</li><li>Free Sons of Israel - <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span> Scholarship</li><li>Polish American Arts Association Scholarship</li><li>Frank L. Weil Memorial Scholarship - <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span></li><li>Adele Kagen Scholarship Fund - <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jewish</span></li><li>National Italian American Foundation Bolla Wines Scholarship</li><li>Rhode Island Polonia Scholarship</li></ul></blockquote><p>OK. So I count 51 items on the list. But actually the "Assunta Luchetti Martino" line is continued on the next line with the "Scholarship for International Studies", so there are actually 50 items.<br /></p><p>19 of 50 items are Jewish. I sampled the requirements for five of the Jewish scholarships and they ALL required the applicant to be JEWISH. That is NOT available to most Whites, since Jews are only 2% of the American population while non-Jewish and non-Hispanic <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States">Whites are around 66% of the population</a>. In fact the Jewish scholarships do NOT have a White racial requirement but a Jewish religious or ethnic one. This leaves 31 non-Jewish scholarships in his list.</p><p>Jews don't really count as White because they usually fiercely assert a separate identity, including a sense of superiority to Whites and contempt for Christianity. If I had to make a wild guess, I'd say perhaps 60+% of Jews feel this way, but this is an experimental question to be determined by evidence. Also, historically and currently, many <a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/02/original-giant-post.html">powerful sections of the Jewish community work against the interests of non-Jewish Whites,</a> including <a href="http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/CofCchap7+Ref.pdf">being instrumental in overturning</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965">the national origin quota in 1965</a>, which was the sine qua non in destroying traditional America.<br /></p><p>Many of the remaining items are NOT restricted by ethnicity. I did a sample of around 15 and 9 were NOT restricted to Whites. Some USED to have ethnic requirements in the past, but now are open to ANY student (e.g. Deutscher Brüderliche Bund is open to anyone who takes one year of German). If you drill into the list, you'll see most are very modest, like $250-$2000 one time scholarships. You can get a sense for how big or notable many of these scholarships are by noting that Mr. de Morsella's article frequently appears right at the top of any google search for these scholarships even though he just mentions these scholarships as one line each in his post.<br /></p><p>Among the ones I sampled that were NOT restricted to Whites OR White ethnic descent are: Mitchell Scholarships, Irish American Scholarship Fund, Irish-American Scholars Program, Marinelli Scholarship, UWM Polish-American Scholarship, Dr. Frank C. Marino Memorial Scholarship (preference but not requirement for Italian descent) and <a href="http://lcwa.cofc.edu/german/scholarships.html">Deutscher Brüderliche Bund Scholarship</a>. Two didn't even apply to Americans!<br /></p><p>Look at the <a href="http://www.us-irelandalliance.org/wmspage.cfm?parm1=34">winners</a> of 2009-2010 Mitchell Scholarship. There is a Black and likely an Asian Muslim, a Hispanic and at least one Jew. Reading <a href="http://www.us-irelandalliance.org/user-assets/Documents/USI_MS_Program_v6.pdf">the requirements</a> demonstrates NO ethnic or racial requirement.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.irishsummerfest.org/html/scholar.html">Irish American Scholarship fund</a> is another that doesn't seem active anymore (as of 2009 the current year on their web page and application is 2006). There is no ethnic requirement and the only mention of anything vaguely ethnic is the <a href="http://www.irishsummerfest.org/heritageapplication.pdf">following question</a>:</p><p></p><blockquote style="font-style: italic;">List the names of any Irish organizations in which you or your family are members:</blockquote>The <a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=irish+american+scholars+program">Irish American Scholars Program</a> is a national program available through many universities and enables study at universities in Northern Ireland. Again, an analysis of the <a href="http://department.monm.edu/offcampus/irish.htm">program</a> <a href="http://www.apcu.net/irishamericanscholars.htm">requirements</a> indicates NO ethnic requirement whatsoever. It just involves study in Northern Ireland.<br /><p></p><p>The <a href="http://www.polanki.org/default.htm">UWM Polish-American</a> Scholarship <a href="http://www.polanki.org/2009_POLANKI_Awards_Application.pdf">does NOT require Polish ancestry</a>:</p><p></p><blockquote>4. of Polish ancestry, OR studying Polish language, history, society, or culture, OR significantly engaged with Polish culture.</blockquote><a href="http://schools.tdsb.on.ca/donmillsci/guidance/scholarship/scholarship_edit.htm">Trans-Canada Alliance of German-Canadians</a> appears to requires attending a provincial CANADIAN University, if it's still active, since latest reference applied to 2001 and the parent organization <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&as_q=scholarship&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=50&lr=&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=www.germancanadian.com&as_qdr=all&as_rights=&as_occt=any&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&safe=images">doesn't seem to mention the scholarship</a> on its website. This is NOT an American scholarship.<br /><p></p><p>The <a href="http://krakow.usconsulate.gov/lane_kirkland_scholarship_program_inaugurated_in_krakow.html">Lane Kirkland Scholarship</a> DOESN'T EVEN APPLY to Americans but is to train leaders from <a href="http://www.pafw.pl/strona.php?setlanguage=2">Eastern Europe and Central Asia at Polish Universities</a>!<br /></p>Mr. de Morsella seems to have the utmost confidence in google, yet he seems too lazy or dishonest to actually google the details of all these supposedly White ethnic scholarships that frequently are NOT.<br /><p>Naturally his list includes NOTHING for WASPs or other long established Whites in America.</p><p>Of course SOME of the items in his list DO have an ethnic requirement, like Italian or Ukranian descent, but even here there is NO racial requirement in the six or so that I sampled, so most if not all of the actual ethnic scholarships in his list can be given to non-Whites as long as they have the required descent: a Black, Hispanic or Asian person of 1/8th Polish or 1/4th Italian descent would qualify by the stated requirements, e.g. <a href="http://www.augustus.org/scholarship.html">the requirements for the Augustus Society</a>: "You must be of Italian Descent". Or consider the Order of the Sons of Italy who <a href="http://www.osia.org/public/scholarships/grants.asp">require at least one Italian or Italian-American grandparent</a>. There are NO racial restrictions in that requirement.<br /></p><p>Another example is the <a href="http://www.niaf.org/scholarships/about.asp">National Italian American Foundation</a> which has two categories of scholarships: </p><p><b></b></p><blockquote><p><b>General Category I:</b> </p><ul>Italian American students who demonstrate outstanding potential and high academic achievements. Area of study: open.</ul> <b>General Category II:</b> <ul>Those students from any ethnic background majoring or minoring in Italian language, Italian studies, Italian American studies or a related field, who demonstrate outstanding potential and high academic achievements.</ul><p><b></b></p><p></p></blockquote><p>And here is how they define Italian American:<br /></p><blockquote><p></p><p><b>Q</b> <span style="color:maroon;">What qualifies an applicant as "Italian American"?</span> </p> <p><b>A</b> To be considered "Italian American" for the NIAF scholarship program, the student must have at least one ancestor who has emigrated from Italy (any region). </p></blockquote><p></p><p>Note: with this definition, a non-White with a great-great grandmother from Italy would qualify (1/16 Italian).<br /></p><p>This is UNLIKE the myriad of explicitly racial and ethnic scholarships that exist for Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, etc, but NOT for Whites. Particularly charming are the convoluted lists designed to mean "everybody BUT a White". Hahaha, that's so clever! It sails right over the heads of dumb White folks!</p>That's a real accurate and honest list of "White" or "White ethnic" scholarships you've got there, Chris! NOT!!!<br /><br />Another major difference is how all of these modest White ethnic scholarships are financed by private interests, like community ethnic organizations or a trust from an estate, while <a href="http://www.hispanicfund.org/2009-sponsors/">hundreds of famous, large corporations</a> contribute many millions of dollars to non-White ethnic scholarships every year, including some with substantial fringe benefits, like the <a href="http://scholarships.hispanicfund.org/applications/subsectionID.1,pageID.123/default.asp">google scholarships</a>.<br /><p>How many corporations are financing White ethnic scholarships? BARELY ANY.<br /></p><p>How does the number and value of corporate White-only scholarships compare to the size and value of minority-0nly scholarships? MASSIVELY DISPROPORTIONATE IN FAVOR OF ANYBODY BUT HIDEOUS WHITES.<br /></p><a href="http://blackoncampus.com/2007/02/17/the-color-of-deception-the-truth-about-race-based-scholarships/">This fellow</a>, Mr. Mance, falls hook, line and sinker for Mr. de Morsella's phony list of supposedly White scholarships and adds some more of his own. At least Mr. Mance goes to the trouble to link to the scholarships and pick out some requirements, although he still neglects to consider that descent from a nationality is NOT the same thing as a racial requirement, so that "Finnish descent" could apply to a non-White of 1/16 Finnish descent. Also, even some of the requirements he lists are NOT ethnic but sometimes just involve being a member of an ethnic organization. e.g.<br /><a target="_blank" href="http://bellsouthpwp2.net/j/o/joeylanglinais/p/PWP-Langlinais/page4.html"></a><blockquote style="font-style: italic;"><a target="_blank" href="http://bellsouthpwp2.net/j/o/joeylanglinais/p/PWP-Langlinais/page4.html">Cajun French Music Association Scholarship</a> — “to apply for this scholarship, applicant must be a member, or a child, grandchild, or great-grandchild of a member in good standing of the Lafayette Chapter of the Cajun French Music Association.”<br /><p><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span></p></blockquote><p>How is that any kind of <a href="http://www.cajunfrenchmusic.org/memberships.html">ethnic requirement</a>? There are several more in HIS list with HIS quotes that don't have ANY ethnic requirements.<br /></p><p><span style="font-weight: bold;">END OF SAMPLING. </span><span style="font-weight: bold;">ORIGINAL POST RESUMES.</span> </p><blockquote style="font-style: italic;">Scholarships that are targeted towards some ethnic group or another literally number in the millions. <span style="font-weight: bold;">The overwhelming majority of these ethnic-scholarships are NOT targeted towards minority groups.</span> These awards are usually NOT for groups that HAVE been historically disadvantaged in our society – but rather they target various white ethnic groups such as those listed above.<br /></blockquote><blockquote><p style="font-style: italic;">This phenomenon of white outrage at scholarships that target traditionally disadvantaged ethnic groups – a rage that is mute when it comes to the <span style="font-weight: bold;">vast majority of ethnically targeted scholarships that are geared towards various white ethnicities is ignorant, ugly and unfounded</span>.<br /></p> </blockquote><p>I dispute his statement that "the overwhelming majority of these ethnic scholarships are NOT targeted towards minority groups". As show above, his list was highly deceptive and did not contain White-only scholarships. Below I will analyze another source that discusses White scholarships to get a sense of how many White scholarships there actually are. The results demonstrate his statement is bollocks, just like everyone knows.</p><p>Again, notice his vicious smearing of anyone that dares dispute the anti-White party line.<br /></p><blockquote style="font-style: italic;">Currently there seem to be fewer and fewer scholarships that target minorities. I know this because we publish scholarship opportunities on our web site <a href="http://www.multiculturaladvantage.com/opportunity/scholarships/scholarships.asp">The Multicultural Advantage</a>. In it we list scholarships, grants, and other opportunities for, not only minorities, but also for women, veterans, international students, older students, GLBT's, disadvantaged students, and students with disabilities. With each new year it is getting harder to find opportunities for minorities as these programs are being dropped as a result of the pressure being applied. Part of the reason scholarships that target disadvantaged minorities are being dropped is that this <span style="font-weight: bold;">hypocritical white backlash</span> only sees ethnic or race when they are non-white and ignores ethnic and race when it is white.</blockquote><p></p> <p>It isn't a HYPOCRITICAL backlash at all. Some Whites are sick of being pretty much the only group promoting a "color-blind" society while other groups are shamelessly ethnocentric and brazenly anti-White. They are resisting the blatant anti-White double standards that govern all the major institutions of our "civil" society. But, please, keep on demonizing and oppressing Whites because soon more and more will start "believing their lying eyes" instead of the false, hypocritical, anti-White propaganda war that dominates our society (Hollywood, advertising, media, academia, K12 education, government, etc). I myself gave up on the so-called color-blind society around two years ago because I realized it's a con game and Whites are the chumps.<br /></p><blockquote><p style="font-style: italic;">I feel that it is time for a healthy backlash against this backlash that simmers in a veritable <span style="font-weight: bold;">witch’s brew</span> of <span style="font-weight: bold;">misdirected anger</span> and <span style="font-weight: bold;">cloaked racism</span>. There is nothing that evil about scholarships that have ethnic or racial focus. I doubt, for example that Joe gets hot under the collar regarding the numerous scholarships that exist for the descendents of Polish immigrants or those that are there for Irish, Italian or Jewish Americans or any number of other “white” ethnic groups. This leads me to seriously question why does this <span style="font-weight: bold;">loud</span> young Republican reserve his indignation, exclusively for the <span style="font-weight: bold;">significantly smaller number of scholarships</span> that exist for disadvantaged ethnic and racial groups.</p> </blockquote><p>Again. This is a lie. There are almost NO scholarships exclusively for Whites. Details further below. Almost all scholarships that Whites actually receive are open to ANYONE.<br /></p><blockquote style="font-style: italic;"><p><span style="font-weight: bold;">There is no consistency or integrity in this overly affected outrage, of his.</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;">It is false, and seems to me at least, to be motivated by something much darker than some righteous quest for justice or fair play</span>.</p><p><span class="label">About the Author:</span> Chris de Morsella is Chief Operating Officer of The Multicultural Advantage, a web site that provides resources designed to help professionals from diverse backgrounds succeed in the workplace and employers increase their diversity recruiting effectiveness. Chris is our global diversity and immigration commentator. Though <span style="font-weight: bold;">his roots are in technology leadership, working on key projects within companies like Microsoft, Associated Press and Thompson Publishing</span>, his work has been focused on diversity staffing issues for over five years. Having worked in the United States, Europe, Asia and Latin America and being able to speak English, Italian and Spanish gives him some interesting perspectives on global diversity issues.</p></blockquote><p></p>So Mr. de Morsella claims Mr. Mroszczyk exhibits bad faith ("affected outrage") and then continues his article-long impugning of his motives and character. Mr de Morsella questions his integrity? That's pretty rich considering the sleazy, deceptive and dishonest piece of agitprop he wrote!<br /><br />Anybody who doesn't agree with him must be an evil racist. But we now know he is either a world-class gibbering idiot too lazy to check the details of his supposedly Whites-only scholarships OR intentionally deceptive and dishonest. I'm voting mostly for the latter, since his background and some <a href="http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/008159.html">other</a> <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16471-could-biodiesel-power-future-rockets.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=energy-fuels">statements</a> he's apparently made on the web demonstrate he's fairly intelligent, i.e. far too intelligent to honestly believe that google hits represent actual scholarships or are closely correlated with the number of such scholarships.<br /><br />Speaking for myself, as one who sincerely believed in the color-blind society from childhood in the 1970s until around 2007, I feel genuine outrage because I'm fed up with the anti-White bias that dominates our society and pretends that the only reason Blacks or Hispanics don't achieve the same outcomes as Whites is from malevolent White racism. The ugly reality is that different groups have different abilities (e.g. American Blacks have an average IQ of 85 compared to the White average of 100 and an Ashkenazi Jewish average of around 113-115) and different cultural traits (e.g. Blacks have over 70% illegitimacy rate and less devotion to education than Whites). These differences ALSO contribute to the difference in outcomes.<br /><br />If this country is so White-centric, then why are Jews and Asians doing so much better than Whites? Why is there a constant stream of politically correct animus towards Whites and Christians throughout our culture and media? I'll discuss this in more detail with references in my upcoming companion post which I'll link to here when it's complete.<br /><br />Why compare Whites to Blacks when both Asians and particularly Jews have EVEN BETTER OUTCOMES than Whites? Look at the numbers of Jews <a href="http://reformjudaismmag.org/_kd/Items/actions.cfm?action=Show&item_id=1278&destination=ShowItem">attending various elite universities</a>: <a href="http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Connelly-Harvard.html">THAT'S DISPROPORTIONATE</a>! Where's the liberal and diversicrat outrage for 2% of the population taking 38% of Northwestern, 33% of Washington University (St. Louis), 30% of Yale, 28% of the University of Pennsylvania, 25.5% of Harvard, 25% of Brown, Columbia and Cornell, 21% of NYU, 18.3% of Michigan, etc? (NOTE: <a href="http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/college/national-search">these are all outstanding schools</a> and <a href="http://www.hillel.org/HillelApps/JLOC/Search.aspx">nearly all outstanding schools have more than 2% Jews</a>: do your own search: e.g. Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is about 10% Jewish as is UC Berkeley: Those are large campuses that are 5 times disproportionate).<br /><h4>Actual White Scholarships: Some Details<br /></h4>Anyone wanting to compare the relative frequencies of ethnic scholarships can start by looking at the different lists at <a href="http://www.nextstudent.com/directory-of-scholarships/Racial/Racial-scholarships.aspx">nextstudent.com</a>. Whites have <a href="http://www.nextstudent.com/directory-of-scholarships/Racial/0004/Racial-Caucasian-scholarships.aspx">1 page of 6 items</a>, four of which are NOT restricted only to Whites. Compare this with the <a href="http://www.nextstudent.com/directory-of-scholarships/Racial/0003/Racial-African-scholarships.aspx">list</a> of African-American scholarships: 26 PAGES of 50 items per page. Wow. That's parity. Hispanics have <a href="http://www.nextstudent.com/directory-of-scholarships/Racial/0006/Racial-Hispanic-scholarships.aspx">22 pages</a>. Asians have <a href="http://www.nextstudent.com/directory-of-scholarships/Racial/0002/Racial-Asian-scholarships.aspx">16 pages</a>. Sure, some of these may not be exclusive, but many of them are and most are designed explicitly to exclude Whites.<br /><br />The White list includes the following items:<blockquote style="font-style: italic;"><table id="dgScholarship" style="border-color: White; border-width: 0px; width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse;" border="0" cellspacing="0" rules="all"><tbody><tr><td><li style="padding: 5px; font-size: 12px;"><a href="http://www.nextstudent.com/directory-of-scholarships/Racial/0004/105100/Racial-Caucasian-Bert-scholarship.aspx"> Bert A. Reinero Scholarship </a></li> </td> </tr><tr> <td> <li style="padding: 5px; font-size: 12px;"><a href="http://www.nextstudent.com/directory-of-scholarships/Racial/0004/80943/Racial-Caucasian-COBA-scholarship.aspx"> COBA Culturally Diverse Student Scholarship </a></li> </td> </tr><tr> <td> <li style="padding: 5px; font-size: 12px;"><a href="http://www.nextstudent.com/directory-of-scholarships/Racial/0004/80258/Racial-Caucasian-David-scholarship.aspx"> David Fischer Minority Scholarship </a></li> </td> </tr><tr> <td> <li style="padding: 5px; font-size: 12px;"><a href="http://www.nextstudent.com/directory-of-scholarships/Racial/0004/95292/Racial-Caucasian-Francis-scholarship.aspx"> Francis Eppes Scholarship </a></li> </td> </tr><tr> <td> <li style="padding: 5px; font-size: 12px;"><a href="http://www.nextstudent.com/directory-of-scholarships/Racial/0004/53301/Racial-Caucasian-Gertrude-scholarship.aspx"> Gertrude McDaris Ruskin & Sidney H. Ruskin Scholarship Fund </a></li> </td> </tr><tr> <td> <li style="padding: 5px; font-size: 12px;"><a href="http://www.nextstudent.com/directory-of-scholarships/Racial/0004/67497/Racial-Caucasian-Werner-scholarship.aspx"> Werner Scott Scholarship </a></li></td></tr></tbody></table></blockquote>Here are the details for the scholarships NOT limited to Whites of these six:<br /><br />1) <a href="http://www.coba.missouristate.edu/assets/coba/THE_BIG_BOOK_2009_10_web.pdf">COBA Culturally Diverse Student</a> (p. 8 of text)<br />2) <a href="http://www.produkte24.com/cy/eckerd-college-750/eckerd-college-academic-course-catalog-530/seite-125.html">David Fischer (applies to Eckerd College)</a><br />3) <a href="http://www.aie.org/Scholarships/detail.cfm?id=14676">Francis Eppes</a><br />4) <a href="https://www.wachoviascholars.com/eruskin/index.php">Gertrude McDaris Ruskin & Sidney H. Ruskin Scholarship Fund </a><br /><br />According to <a href="http://www.produkte24.com/cy/eckerd-college-750/eckerd-college-academic-course-catalog-530/seite-125.html">this page</a>:<br /><blockquote style="font-style: italic;">David Fischer Minority, established in 2001 in honor of St. Petersburg Mayor David Fischer to help increase diversity among the Eckerd College student body.<br /></blockquote>An analysis of the <a href="http://www.eckerd.edu/commondataset/index.php?f=home">demographics</a> of Eckerd college indicates it is predominantly White (at least 1407 out of 1835), so increasing diversity means more non-Whites.<br /><br />So 3 of the six are NOT limited to Whites in any way and an additional one is for either Cherokee or Anglo-Saxon descent. Only TWO of six are actually purely restricted to Whites. Sure this list may not be an exhaustive listing of all racial scholarships, but it reasonably accurately reflects the great disparity between White and non-White scholarships.<br /><h4>Conclusion<br /></h4>The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was sold as the creation of a new color-blind society where everyone was to be judged on the content of their character and NOT on the color of their skin. Almost immediately explicit discrimination was implemented via affirmative action and we've been living in an increasingly Orwellian society filled with doublethink and outright hypocrisy (i.e. supposedly we're "equal opportunity" while having blatant double standards that favor EVERY non-White minority, even groups and individuals that have NO history in the county and just got off the plane).<br /><br />A reasonable argument could be made for favorable treatment for groups that were mistreated in the past like Blacks, Native Americans and those specific Hispanics and their descendants that were historically present within the US with some proportionality to the degree of mistreatment and the degree of membership within the mistreated group. But it is utterly unfair to give special benefits to foreigners or ethnic groups that have no history in this county during the era of mistreatment at the expense of the traditional population.<br /><br />Another consideration is that substantial favorable treatment has already been granted for many decades and the cold hard reality is that a substantial part of the outcome disparity between different racial and ethnic groups arises from innate biological differences and chosen cultural differences. By facing these painful truths more constructive and effective social policy can be developed to benefit our struggling citizens.<br /><br />It's become clear that multiculturalism doesn't really "celebrate" other cultures so much as it hates Whites and is driven by a desire to marginalize and ultimately eliminate Whites.<br /><br />If the multiculturalists and our ruling elites keep pushing anti-White hatred and discrimination, then Whites should push back hard and advocate just as aggressively for their own racial interests like Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Jews and every other group.ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-19635198727452495492009-02-24T23:50:00.005-05:002009-04-04T01:40:57.319-04:00Opposing the Left: Higher Education<h4>Introduction<br /></h4>When I refer to the Left, I'm referring to what I believe to be the "evil Left". I'm not saying that everything or everyone on the Left is evil or wrong, but I do think that many of the people and doctrines like Cultural Marxism and multiculturalism are primarily motivated by an animus to Whites instead of a true dedication to justice or fairness. So for simplicity, instead of constantly saying "evil Left", I'll just say "Left".<br /><br />Higher education holds part of the "brain" of the Left that propagates multicultural, anti-White and other Cultural Marxist ideologies to our institutions and power centers, like government, Mainstream Media, Hollywood, corporations, non-profit organizations, ethnic activist organizations, the diversity industry, K12 education and others. The academic Left leads the Cultural Marxist indoctrination our intellectual and cognitive elites.<br /><br />Many departments within the social sciences and humanities have essentially been captured by the Left with many of these "scholars" acting primarily as promoters and activists. Many departments restrict entry to like-minded comrades or blackball right-wing dissenters. Whiteness Studies is a particularly egregious example.<br /><br />Weakening the academic Left should pay large, cascading dividends.<br /><h4>Higher Education is too Expensive<br /></h4>Traditional higher education is ridiculously expensive for the learning it provides and is inflexible by requiring physical presence at a specific time and place. This expense has grown well beyond inflation for decades. One fraction of the high cost comes from the physical and administrative overhead of the modern university, while another is the subsidizing of faculty research using undergraduate tuition, which is usually unfair for the students, since high-powered professors usually leave most teaching to graduate students. Another portion of the cost arises from diverting money to fund the Left and its pet causes, including employing Leftist ideologues as "scholars" to formulate Leftist ideology and engage in activism, and funding activist campus organizations serving as training grounds for Leftists starting on their Long March through our societal institutions.<br /><h4>An Alternative: VECS<br /></h4>Higher education is on the brink of a revolution displacing a noticeable fraction of existing academia with an alternative system we can call the Virtual Education and Certification System (VECS), since hopefully it will vex the Left. VECS will be an online alternative that is cheaper and more flexible by separating learning from the certifying of student mastery.<br /><br />A major business opportunity exists to replace the current "manual" and "physical" education with "automated" and "virtual" education. This emerging business will be both profitable and save students money, time and inconvenience. Some businesses are already in this market but not with the depth and sophistication I believe possible. The University of Phoenix is probably the largest virtual university, while many traditional universities, like the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign actively court online students.<br /><br />Some of the communications and collaborative technologies to fully implement the vision still need to be developed and deployed but should be available over the next decade or so.<br /><br />VECS would dramatically extend the current online offerings by splitting the learning process from the process of certifying mastery of a subject. A quality education with nearly all the benefits of the current system plus additional benefits could be had more cheaply for most students. Statistically, most students don't really take advantage of resources like instructor's office hours or even lectures. Students would only pay for what they use.<br /><br />There has been a recent trend favoring inexpensive community colleges for non-elite students that offers some lower cost competition to VECS, although I think VECS would offer better for less. Community colleges could also team up with VECS to provide physical facilities as needed.<br /><h4>The First Half: Student Learning<br /></h4>Students could learn at their own pace using whatever sources they desire. Extensive high-quality lectures would be available. Many different versions of each course could be developed by the most exceptional teachers targeting students of varying ability and diverse learning styles. Students can choose presentations that best match their needs, or a combination of lessons if needed. e.g. $50 for whole semester of lectures and $1-3 per individual lecture depending on how many are purchased (discount for purchasing more). An active, electronic book might cost $40, since no physical books need to be manufactured. Course costs would likely vary depending on popularity, lecture creation costs, size of target audience, etc.<br /><br />Since this course content is sold to a mass audience and is electronic, it can be enhanced incrementally at relatively low cost and the scholars and staff creating it will receive higher status and monetary rewards than traditional faculty. The existing system is very labor inefficient where, typically, many non-stellar lecturers create many middling variants of similar course materials. VECS would encourage the most outstanding and effective teachers to create reusable learning materials.<br /><br />There could also be some flexibility in coverage of materials so highly intelligent students could cover a broader range of material more deeply.<br /><br />The virtual approach wouldn't work well for a few specialized subjects or classes, like laboratory intensive courses, hands-on engineering, etc, but ways to get around this could be devised, including sophisticated computer simulations, partnering with existing institutions, corporations, government or creating regional campuses that students can visit occasionally to perform capital-intensive work. Some subjects can be left wholly to traditional universities if they're too hard to virtualize.<br /><br />Fortunately, the virtual approach works well for ALL the politicized humanities and social sciences, and all of the general curriculum courses that such politicized instructors currently use for indoctrinating non-majors. The displacement of part of traditional academia with VECS would starve funds from an important fraction of the Left. For example, if over 30% of current Whiteness Studies and ethnic studies professors had to find new jobs, they couldn't use academia to leech off of the non-elite Whites they despise and want to marginalize.<br /><br />By creating new virtual institutions, many non-Leftist scholars currently shut out of market, might be employed and spend part of their time doing anti-Leftist and alternative research. Also, because fewer of our intelligentsia would be marinated in Leftist dominated environments, hopefully more non-Leftist scholars and professionals could be cultivated. A goal to is provide a traditional, high-quality education emphasizing communication and reasoning skills, so the student can work and think independently.<br /><br />A functional online library could be created or licensed either directly from content publishers or existing libraries. If they refused to do so, either minimal fair use sources could be created for instructional purposes or the internet and local libraries could be used as needed for library research. Once VECS became large enough, existing libraries or content producers would eventually compete for this market share. e.g. student library fee of $25-$300/year, with the $300 fee referring to serious scholarly use of library resources by a graduate student. I consider that number an high upper limit. Google Books, before it was partially locked down recently, demonstrated the feasibility of digitizing millions of books and making them easily searchable and browsable. In fact Google Books already provides a large usable library if you restrict your sources to those having expired copyrights.<br /><h4>New Tools for Student Teacher Interaction<br /></h4>One part that existing online universities don't really get right are the various interactions between instructors and students. I imagine a sophisticated set of tools to create learning networks that link students with peers and varying levels of grad student or professor for one-on-one or group discussion and projects. Students could build long-term relationships with preferred teachers or they could contract out as needed with anyone available. Commonly students would choose a set of teachers as special mentors who would take an interest in their progress and act as mentors and possible career references.<br /><br />Tools could be created to match student to teacher very flexibly. For example, if a student or a small study group wanted to ask some questions at 3 AM they could put out a search request for anyone available for a certain subject with a proposed price. The teachers could've set their profile ahead of time to match the appropriate courses, minimum acceptable price and their availability. The student would only see the results of available teachers without necessarily being able to browse the teachers availability (to protect privacy if desired). The student could then look over the teacher's ratings and decide whether to hire the teacher. Procedures could be devised to deal with student dissatisfaction. Records of the interaction could be kept to audit complaints. Most would behave reasonably to protect their reputations because both students and teachers could be rated as troublemakers if they act up too much.<br /><br />For example, students could pay $10-$200/hour for instructional consulting depending on desired expert level, ranging from a junior or senior tutor, graduate student, postdoc, or OK, good, great or outstanding professor and so on. All these folks could have ratings like on Amazon based on student satisfaction and they could market themselves to different categories of student (e.g. very patient with slow students, average students, outstanding high-IQ students, etc).<br /><br />Since most students don't spend much time directly interacting with professors, such one-on-one time can be purchased as needed. For example, during a course a student may spend $190 for one-on-one time as follows: $30 for 2 hours with a $15/hour senior plus $160 for 2 hours with a $80/hour professor. Notice that this is more exclusive time than most current students get and the cost is modest compared to traditional course costs. The student has complete control of how much money to spend and how to allocate their spending.<br /><br />For recitations, a small group of 10 students could split the costs of a one hour weekly discussion session with an $100/hour professor: $10/student over say 12 weeks yields $120/student for the class. Of course, instead of being constrained to a single one hour recitation, it could be broken up into two 30 minute sessions per week so people who can't always make the live session could submit questions that might be addressed by the professor or group.<br /><br />Students that wanted to save some money might prefer to spend somewhat less to view prerecorded recitations. Students and professors who offered their recitation for sale could receive some compensation for any use of their recitations.<br /><br />Of course recitations aren't mandatory. They're just a way for a group of students to encourage group learning with a high-value expert at a lower cost since they're sharing the bill. And there really is no specific timetable for learning, but many students might prefer to adhere to a rigid schedule to avoid procrastination and laziness.<br /><br />Students can also create peer support groups that are essentially free, or perhaps they periodically hire a senior or a grad student to answer some of their questions or discuss the material at a very low per student cost (e.g. $16/hour divided by 4 students is $4/hour). So 15 hours of this assistance over the course of a class would cost only $60 per student.<br /><h4>Some Rough Cost Estimates<br /></h4>Most traditional universities are charging about $800 to $4000 per class when total costs are included (excluding room & board). The high-end numbers represent expensive private universities, including the big-name elites like MIT and the low-end numbers represent state subsidized universities. Those numbers leave a lot of room for undercutting. A basic package of training materials, instructional time and certification test might run $300-$800 so it would usually even undercut the in-state tuition of many state supported colleges. Poor students can trade off the costs of assisted learning for using free course materials and more individual and peer work to eliminate all instructional costs. But most students probably would prefer to benefit from top-notch commercial instructional materials and the personal assistance from experts for a few hundred dollars per course. Of course if students are not prepared for the certification test, they would likely fail and need to retake it. That is no different than the current system except that retaking a certification test would be much cheaper than retaking a traditional class.<br /><h4>Student Networking<br /></h4>Another facet of traditional education missing from current online universities is the socialization and human networking which is probably the most significant factor in elite education, like the Ivies. Part of this could be recreated through collaborative online communities working through common projects and having an infrastructure for peer support and socializing. It may also be possible to create or frequent local meeting places for students to study together, socialize and network, at least within or near cities. Also, there could periodically be regional meetings allowing some socialization with peers. e.g. having periodic meetings 100-200 miles away. Modern social networking technologies will likely partially replace socialization from attending traditional universities by allowing similar peers to be discovered locally and cultivated.<br /><br />Since students passing certifications would also be proven achievers (discussed below), there would likely be interest from the local business and professional community in mentoring or networking with these students.<br /><h4>The Second Half: Certification<br /></h4>Now let's consider the certification half, since we're separating training from the certification of student mastery, unlike current universities. It's well known that current universities are suffering a plague of grade inflation since they've relaxed traditional educational standards in favor of profiting from the "educational industry complex" which can't afford to disappoint high-paying customers. So modern college transcripts really aren't taken all that seriously by the business world, since, typically, most students are getting A and B grades for showing up for class and making a modest effort, unlike fifty years ago when higher education was more restricted to the cognitive elites and grading was more severe.<br /><h5>Objective and Trustworthy Tests</h5>High-quality, reliable certification tests would provide a far more objective and trustworthy measure of student mastery than the current unreliable system. Different certification vendors could exist, and based on the quality of their result, they might have varying acceptance by the marketplace. I'm most interested a vendor providing genuinely reliable and competent assessment of the student's mastery in many subjects. The tests could include fairly elaborate testing processes including multiple choice, short answers, essays, work products, problem solving, computer demonstration, audio and video answers, creative works and oral exams. I fully expect that for nearly all certification tests professionals would grade exams requiring a demonstration of student work or essays, just like at a good university, with only a modest fraction of a test being machine gradable answers. This would make student cheating much harder, because even though there may not be an infinite set of questions, if they're able to master the very large set of questions, they essentially know the subject anyway. Small details can be changed for many sorts of questions to make memorization nearly impossible. And over time additional questions can be added into the wider pool eventually creating such a large set that it wouldn't really help most students unless they had an eidetic memory.<br /><br />Since most of the grading would involve some subjective judgment, sets of 3-5 independent graders would typically each score these subjective questions and an overall grade would be calculated. If there is unusual disagreement between graders, more attention would be applied to the deviations. Auditors would periodically review the full grading system to make sure it is reasonably consistent and fair. Questions would be designed to eliminate the need for students to inject any personal details, like race, ethnicity or sex, unless that was important for the subject. Fairly detailed grading standards would be developed and published to make the system as objective as possible. Full records would be privately kept for long periods to help insure the system is as consistent and fair as possible.<br /><h5>College Curricula Define Standard Courses</h5>Modern college curricula could be used as a baseline for standardizing certification test coverage. Some states are already creating standards to systematize in-state transfer of course credits. Detailed specifications of course content and test expectations could be published. There might be some flexibility in the range of material covered so that as long as the student showed they had a reasonable mastery of a good subset of the material, that would be adequate for passing. For example, in one block of 10 questions the student must choose 5 to answer. Scores could be assigned based on the proficiency demonstrated. Also, the student could choose among a few variations of the course that emphasizes different sets of material if that makes sense for the subject matter.<br /><br />Different tests could be targeted to different levels of student (e.g standard, superior, elite) and the level would be included in the transcript. This corresponds to the quality and difficulty range of existing universities and regular versus honors courses. The upper reaches of student achievement could also be tested if desired. e.g. proficiency at the 99.9 percentile level, by having fairly difficult tests that spread out the full range of student mastery. Certification tests could be spread out over multiple sittings, like two three hour exams, or classes could be certified in smaller units, e.g. certifying each half of a semester course separately.<br /><h5>Standardized Testing Centers</h5>There would be standardized testing centers where the student is filmed while taking the test to prevent cheating (that record would be deleted after the results are certified and the student approves the result, thereby waiving rights to sue, etc). Typically the tests might be $150-$300 per class. Since the certification costs are not staggeringly high and some tools would be provided to help the student assess whether they're ready to take the test, the pressure shouldn't be overwhelming, since they can always take the test later. Some accommodation might be made for students who have severe problems with high-stakes testing, although they should bear that extra cost and that should be noted on their transcript.<br /><h5>Complicated Certification Tests Just Cost More (and are Rare)<br /></h5>In some cases it might make sense for the certification to include ongoing supervised work or testing, for example, for a project involving significant initiative or creativity. Again, this is likely to be statistically rare so the higher costs wouldn't be too burdensome compared to the total educational costs. For example, some supervision and testing demonstrating that the student created a large computer program. That might be needed once or twice for a computer science degree. Technology may be usable to record the student creating their work product as proof of authorship.<br /><br />There can even be high-value oral exams before three professors using the high-quality video infrastructure normally used for student/teacher collaboration. Complicated exams like this would be the exception and might cost over $500 since, for example, it may involve one hour from a $120/hour professor and one hour each from two $80/hour professors, plus additional costs. Again, this sort of test would be rare.<br /><br />Certification has the virtue of allowing self-motivated students to achieve recognition of their mastery at any time with no overhead other than testing costs.<br /><h4>Some General Impacts<br /></h4>VECS would probably impact the lower tiers of academia more than the elites, although I would hope several non-Leftist elite virtual universities would be created, supporting many scholars critiquing the Left and formulating alternative ideas, as well as supporting non-partisan objective scholars. Hopefully, scholars could create new virtualized and localized educational communities where they could perform their research while making money training and certifying students without all the soul-draining administrative tedium required by current universities. Hopefully they could recreate much of the value of a research community through gathering in common localities or using the new collaborative and communication tools. They could also be adjunct at traditional universities, particularly as VECS gains acceptance and traditional universities want a piece of the pie.<br /><br />If scholars could be paid around $50-$200/hour for around 10-20 hours per week for one-on-one teaching or recitation with very low adminstrative overhead, and received funds for student certification, their research, e.g. by foundations or the government, and consulting out their intellectual skills, then they could still have some reasonable time for academic research while living a reasonably comfortable life. Many scholars don't have that opportunity today given the shenanigans Big Education pulls like using legions of adjunct faculty. Popular teachers may be able to make salaries like $300+/hour for teaching groups (e.g. weekly lectures or discussions with groups of 15 for $20/hour per student).<br /><br />The overall effect would likely be to reduce some employment of scholars in academia and education, since some previous labor would be eliminated by automation. But this may also free up student funds to support more one-on-one and small group discussions built around a standardized lecture package, so employment may not drop precipitously but instead be redirected to higher-quality interactions for the students. Education would be more affordable, efficient and flexible. Particularly effective teachers would command a larger consulting rate and be in high demand.<br /><br />VECS works particularly well for training undergrads since they normally don't get that much attention from professors at many universities. With this model they could get that attention if they needed it at a lower cost than traditional universities. Adult and non-traditional students would be drawn to the flexibility and low cost, since they may have commitments precluding traditional full-time attendance.<br /><br />Since this new form of education could deliver better training and better measurement of mastery with significantly lower costs and greater flexibility, I would expect market pressure to draw some significant fraction of students toward this option. And since business would gain a much better estimation of student abilities, they would have more confidence in these certification results. Market acceptance of certification would provide all the needed legitimacy to increase market share. Small business can lead the way in accepting these new certifications, since they would have practical value and small businesses may want to help weaken our out-of-control elites.<br /><br />Communities should be strengthened since fewer youth need to leave to get a quality education, and career transitions will be easier and cheaper, which is helpful in dynamic and unstable economy.<br /><br />Also, the same logic and some of the same infrastructure could be used to provide a wider set of pragmatic career training. As suggested by Charles Murray in his book Real Education, too many students attend four year colleges that aren't good fits for their abilities, interests or career prospects. It makes more sense to channel lower ability students into more pragmatic, focused training that doesn't waste their time and money.<br /><br />In fact this entire scheme might be transferrable to K12 education and might point the way to reducing the baneful influence of the Cultural Marxists and teachers unions.<br /><h4>Some Concerns<br /></h4>One concern is student and instructor privacy. For example, a politician wouldn't want his fiery student discussions about overthrowing the system and reeducating the masses to leak out on the web. There can likely be both legal and technical approaches to mitigating privacy concerns.<br /><br />For example, all audio and video streams could add a wide set of dynamic watermarks that vary per user, so if the data is leaked in the future, there would hopefully be way to track down the source of the leak, even if it had undergone some distortion trying to mask the source. By a wide set of dynamic watermarks, I mean that hundreds or thousands of relatively insignificant changes are made to the data in such a way that intelligibility is preserved, but the data has been customized in a way that is hard to hide even with substantial data transformation. This is a speculation on my part; I don't know if this is technically feasible.<br /><br />Legal protections for networking privacy could be established to restrict use of any leaked data with penalties for people who misuse illegally leaked data, e.g. to humiliate someone.<br /><br />Students could choose to maintain more privacy by not disclosing their real names and using an avatar instead of live video. There may soon be photorealistic or cartoon-like video avatar technology that monitors your behavior and causes your avatar to mimic your motions, like facial expressions or lip movements. Voice obfuscation could transform your voice to be unrecognizable or to sound like Bugs Bunny or Jack Nicholson.<br /><br />Another concern is that the contract instructor labor will be fulfilled largely by cheaper foreign labor, e.g. from India, China or Eastern Europe, undercutting American scholars. That is a distinct possibility.<br /><br />Another objection might be that a few corporations will dominate VECS and enforce Leftist ideology in the training materials. e.g. engaging in biased grading of essay exams if they don't regurgitate Leftist shibboleths or subtexts. As long as a certification system delivers high-quality skill, ability and knowledge assessments, the market will accept it, so traditionalists could create alternatives if needed. My hope is that non-Leftists can get a foothold in these emerging fields and prevent them from being politicized. The main goal is to break the current ideological near monopoly in academia.<br /><br />Another concern is that widespread adoption of VECS would seriously damage our University R&D. This is a valid concern. Our R&D has been under strain for many reasons, including outsourcing of R&D by corporations, offshoring of manufacturing, insourcing of many foreigners at lower wages to act as research scientists and engineers, and other factors. So this is added to the massive list of indicators of decline we need to oppose. Academia should not believe they'll be spared while the rest of society goes down in flames. Average students and their families will fight against the current research funding rent-seeking done on their backs.<br /><h4>Conclusion: Like it or not, here it comes<br /></h4>Regardless of whether VECS is a wise change to our education system, and I do believe it will be a valuable addition, based on the large gains in productivity and lower cost, this sort of change will occur whether we want it or not. It won't displace all existing institutions, but it will likely shrink the existing system noticeably. Higher Education can't continue its stratospheric rise in costs without consequences or competition. And given the policies of our elites to offshore increasingly skilled labor and insource foreign professionals to drive down domestic wages, the trumpeted value of ultra-expensive higher education is in doubt. Many students and their families will gladly abandon $100,000 debts for a more flexible and pretty much just-as-good $12,000-$25,000 education.ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-61008159966334445482009-02-16T01:42:00.007-05:002009-02-17T00:04:33.761-05:00Whiteness Studies: Noel Ignatiev Also Critiques Jews<span style="font-size:100%;">This is the first of several posts I intend to write on Whiteness Studies, a recently developed "scholarly" field that is actually populated exclusively with committed, Leftist, anti-White activists.<br /><br />More disturbing is the widening power these activists and their allies wield through the placement of cadres or fellow travelers within institutions, or other forms of influence like diversity industry "training" (i.e, reeducation) in universities, K12 education, corporations, military, government and the broader society, frequently using public funds.<br /><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noel_Ignatiev">Noel Ignatiev</a> is one of the Jewish leaders of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiteness_studies">Whiteness Studies</a> movement, a co-founder of the journal <a href="http://www.racetraitor.org/">Race Traitor</a> and the notorious source of several widely-cited, genocidal-sounding quotes. He's not a "hypocritical Jew" since he holds somewhat similar beliefs critiquing Israel, Zionism and anti-Semitism </span><span style="font-size:100%;">(details below).</span><span style="font-size:100%;"><br /></span><span style="font-size:100%;"><br />Below is the "What We Believe" statement from the homepage of the <a href="http://www.racetraitor.org/">racetraitor.org</a> site with some particularly incendiary quotes bolded:</span><span style="font-size:100%;"><br /><span style="font-style: italic;"></span><blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;">The white race is a historically constructed social formation. It consists of all those who partake of the privileges of the white skin in this society. Its most wretched members share a status higher, in certain respects, than that of the most exalted persons excluded from it, in return for which they give their support to a system that degrades them.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race</span>, which means no more and no less than abolishing the privileges of the white skin. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue, domestic and foreign, in US society.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">The existence of the white race depends on the willingness of those assigned to it to place their racial interests above class, gender, or any other interests they hold. The defection of enough of its members to make it unreliable as a predictor of behavior will lead to its collapse.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">RACE TRAITOR aims to serve as an intellectual center for those seeking to abolish the white race</span>. It will encourage dissent from the conformity that maintains it and popularize examples of defection from its ranks, analyze the forces that hold it together and those that promise to tear it apart. Part of its task will be to promote debate among abolitionists. When possible, it will support practical measures, guided by the principle, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity</span>.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">The editors publish things in RACE TRAITOR because they think that publishing them will help build a community of readers. Editorial opinions are expressed in editorials and unsigned replies to letters. </span><br /></blockquote>Here's another aggressive, genocidally-worded <a href="http://harvardmagazine.com/2002/09/abolish-the-white-race.html">exhortation</a>:</span><span style="font-size:100%;"><br /><span style="font-style: italic;"><blockquote>Every group within white America has at one time or another advanced its particular and narrowly defined interests at the expense of black people as a race. That applies to labor unionists, ethnic groups, college students, schoolteachers, taxpayers, and white women. Race Traitor will not abandon its focus on whiteness, no matter how vehement the pleas and how virtuously oppressed those doing the pleading. The editors meant it when they replied to a reader, "<span style="font-weight: bold;">Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed—not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.</span>"</blockquote></span></span><span style="font-size:100%;">This Occidental Observer <a href="http://www.theoccidentalobserver.com/articles/Editorial-Ignatiev.html">editorial</a> disputes Ignatiev's claims of innocence in using genocidal language. </span><span style="font-size:100%;">He claims to not want genocide against Whites but rather to radically reorder society.<br /><br />Ignatiev is a Communist desiring the revolutionary transformation of the US.<br /><br />Here's the conclusion of his pamphlet <span style="text-decoration: underline;"></span><a href="http://libcom.org/library/1600-1980-introduction-united-states-noel-ignatiev?quicktabs_1=0">Introduction to the United States: An Autonomist Political History</a>:<blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;"></span><span style="font-style: italic;">A revolutionary strategy is, in short, a strategy of dual power. It is the treating of revolution as an act for today, as a part of the continuous struggle, instead of a dream to be indefinitely postponed in the interest of "realism".</span><br /><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">From what we have said so far it should be evident that we regard the struggle against white supremacy as the most advanced outpost of the new society and the key ingredient in a revolutionary strategy. The waging of that struggle among whites is the main distinctive task of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sojourner_Truth_Organization">STO</a>, as befits its character as an organization made up of white people.</span></blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;"></span>Here's the <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=eiPFHAAACAAJ">Google Book Link</a>. The pamphlet was originally published in 1980 and then reprinted in 1992.<br /><br />More recently, from an <a href="http://www.racetraitor.org/zmagazineinterview.pdf">interview</a> conducted on St. Patrick's Day in 1996: </span><blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;">Now if there were five or ten per cent counterfeit whites around—people who</span><span style="font-size:100%;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic;">looked white but really weren’t—then, I think, the white skin would lose its</span><span style="font-size:100%;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic;">value. The judge, the school principal, the cop, the social worker, the personnel</span><span style="font-size:100%;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic;">officer at the plant—and all of the other people who implement and carry</span><span style="font-size:100%;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic;">out the racial tracking of our society—would no longer be sure about how to</span><span style="font-size:100%;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic;">perform their function. <span style="font-weight: bold;">The white race would undergo some kind of fission or</span></span><span style="font-size:100%;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">self-destruction, and we would open up to the possibilities that could transform</span><span style="font-size:100%;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">this country from the nightmare that it has been into the dream that it</span><span style="font-size:100%;"> </span><span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">might be</span>.</span></blockquote><span style="font-size:100%;">And from: <a href="http://racetraitor.org/whitestudies.html">Abolutionism and "White Studies"</a>: (last paragraph) </span><span style="font-style: italic;"><blockquote>The task of the nineteenth century was to abolish slavery. The task of the twentieth century was to end legal segregation. The next task facing the American people is the abolition of the white race as a social category. The movement to abolish slavery stimulated women's rights and other reform movements. The Civil Rights movement helped give birth to the counterculture and various oppositional movements. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Today nothing offers a greater likelihood of revolutionizing the political climate than a comprehensive challenge to whiteness and its ways.</span></blockquote></span><span style="font-size:100%;">It should be recognized that although Ignatiev is a self-described non-believing Jew, he forcefully denounces some of the most important Jewish interests as understood by many Jews: </span><ul><li><span style="font-size:100%;">The right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state</span></li><li><span style="font-size:100%;">The use of anti-Semitism accusations to restrict debate about Israel and Jewish influence</span></li><li><span style="font-size:100%;">The causes of Anti-Semitism being only evil Gentiles </span></li></ul><span style="font-size:100%;">He loudly condemns Zionism and considers Israel a racist state. His proposed solution is a unified non-sectarian Palestine including both Jews and Palestinians without any legal favoritism for Jews, and with Palestinians having the Right of Return, full legal rights and financial assistance. Obviously very few Jews accept this solution, since it destroys their conception of Israel as a Jewish ethnostate, and, in the real world, Ignatiev's proposed solution would likely lead to the eventual subjugation or genocide of most Israeli Jews. Of course, Israel is in an extremely difficult long-term strategic position no matter what approach they take, particularly with the fast-approaching proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.<br /><br />Hilariously, he uses the example of South Africa to reassure Israelis to gamble on the good faith of the Palestinians for their survival: <span style="font-style: italic;"><blockquote>...the establishment of majority rule did not cause the gods to weep or the earth to open and swallow the people...</blockquote></span>I wonder why didn't he use Zimbabwe as a heartwarming example of post-racial brotherhood?<br /><br />Of course South Africa is puttering along behind Zimbabwe by one or two decades but is following the same, drearily predictable descent.<br /><br />Following are several <a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html">quotes</a> demonstrating his beliefs:<br /><br />1) Israel as racial state: </span><blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;">Israel is a racial state, where rights are assigned on the basis of ascribed descent or the approval of the superior race. In this respect it resembles the American South prior to the passage of the Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts, Ireland under the Protestant Ascendancy, and, yes, Hitlerite Germany. But in its basic structures it most closely resembles the old South Africa. It is therefore not surprising that Israel should have developed a close alliance with South Africa when that country was still under apartheid.</span> </blockquote><span style="font-size:100%;">2) Jewish Influence in the US: </span><blockquote><span style="font-size:100%;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Is one permitted to say above the level of a whisper that U.S. policy toward Israel has something to do with Jewish influence in the U.S.? Perhaps Nobel Peace Prize winner Bishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa can get away with it: "The Israel government," he observed, "is placed on a pedestal [in the U.S.] People are scared in this country to say wrong is wrong because the Jewish lobby is powerful-very powerful" (Guardian 29 April 2002).</span> <span style="font-style: italic;">Not only does Zionism shape U.S. policy, it stifles discussion of alternatives. To cite a personal example: Two years ago a PBS reporter interviewed me on the eve of the UN-sponsored conference on racism about to be held in S. Africa. I made some remarks about Israel, and afterwards I asked her if she would use what I said. "Of course not," she replied. "I agree with you, and so do all the journalists I know, but we can't run any criticism of Israel without following it by at least ten refutations." Harvard Professor Daniel Pipes and Martin Kramer of the Middle East Forum have begun a website, Campus Watch," to denounce academics deemed to have shown "hatred of Israel." Students are to inform on professors.</span></span></blockquote><span style="font-size:100%;"><span style="font-style: italic;"></span>3) Sources of anti-Semitism: </span><blockquote><span style="font-size:100%;"><span style="font-style: italic;">If I accomplish nothing else in this talk, I hope to create space for some who are repelled by Israeli actions but are held back from condemning Zionism by a desire not to be antisemitic.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Does what I have just said mean that I dismiss the possibility of a revival of anti-semitism? No, it does not. History shows that anti-semitism ebbs and flows, and that it may return. Time prevents me from exploring that history in any depth; let me instead recommend two books: The Jewish Question by Abram Leon and The Origins of Totalitarianism by Hannah Arendt (in particular the first part, "anti-semitism"). <span style="font-weight: bold;">For now I will say only that anti-semitism (or more accurately anti-Jewish sentiment) is rooted neither in human nature or Christian theology; it is the product of social relations, including the historic concentration of Jews as representatives of commerce in non-commercial societies. The peculiar occupational distribution of European Jews led members of the dispossessed classes among the non-Jewish population to direct their animosity toward the Jews as the visible agents of oppression.</span> "anti-semitism," as the 19th-century German Socialist August Bebel put it, "is the socialism of fools." It is not beyond historical explanation (as is implied by a term like "The Holocaust," which takes anti-semitism out of history and relocates it the realm of natural phenomena).</span></span></blockquote><span style="font-size:100%;"><span style="font-style: italic;"></span>4) His proposed solution to the Israel/Palestine conflict: </span><blockquote><span style="font-size:100%;"><span style="font-style: italic;">What solution, therefore, do I propose? A simple and moderate one: within historic Palestine, the area between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River, live ten million people. I propose that there be established there a single state, in which every person who declares his intention to live there and adopt citizenship be recognized as a citizen and have one vote. I propose further that the special advantages given to Jews be terminated, that the Palestinians who were forced into exile after 1948, and their descendants, be granted the right to live there, and that the state undertake practical measures to make it possible for them to do so by building housing and extending to them to right to rent or buy, if necessary providing funds to help them. I propose further that both Hebrew and Arabic be declared official state languages to be taught in the schools, that all residents be granted the right to publish newspapers and maintain cultural institutions in any language they choose, that the special position of Orthodox Judaism be ended and that the state declare freedom of worship and make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.</span></span></blockquote><span style="font-size:100%;">Ignatiev has also authored a five-page entry on Zionism for the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Encyclopedia-Race-Racism-Set/dp/002866020X">Encyclopedia of Race of Racism</a> that has been roundly <a href="http://www.adl.org/PresRele/IslME_62/5395_62.htm">condemned</a> by many Jewish groups. <a href="http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/10/13/macmillan-usa-encyclopedia-damns-zionism-as-racism/">This link</a> contains a critique and a link where someone uploaded a PDF file from a photocopy of the full entry.<br /><br />Future posts will consider some ideas for coping with the White-hating Left.<br /><br /><br /><br /></span>ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-29118363726288098772009-02-12T14:33:00.012-05:002009-04-08T12:19:58.836-04:00Some Jews Supportive of White AdvocacyThis post will hold a list of Jews and Jewish Organizations that are supportive of White Advocacy.<br /><br />As I discover more, I'll update this list.<br /><br />This initial list is pretty small because I've just started researching this topic so I'm sure there are plenty more to be added.<br /><br />[THIS LINE IS A PLACE HOLDER FOR A LINK TO A FUTURE POST ABOUT WHY WHITE ADVOCACY IS NECESSARY SINCE OUR SOCIETY HAS BECOME UNFAIRLY BIASED AGAINST WHITES]<br /><br />Let me know if other categories would make sense. Feel free to leave suggestions in the comments.<br /><br />I particularly thank the empathetic Jews willing to see how Gentiles might be ticked off at the anti-White and anti-Christian actions of some Jews and who try persuading their brethren to question and change their anti-White positions. They give me hope that we can all work together to create a just, mutually beneficial society.<br /><br />Organizations/Publications/Web Sites:<br /><ul><li><a href="http://www.jtf.org/">The Jewish Task Force</a><br /></li></ul>Bloggers and Writers (address the Jewish Question in good faith):<br /><ul><li><a href="http://kvetcher.net/">Kvetcher</a></li><li><a href="http://latteisland.blogspot.com/">latté island</a></li><li><a href="http://www.marcusepstein.com/">Marcus Epstein</a></li><li><a href="http://paulgottfried.com/">Paul Gottfried</a><br /></li><li><a href="http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/">Nicholas Stix</a><br /></li></ul>Bloggers (not sure if address the Jewish Question):<br /><br />Bloggers (seemingly unwilling to confront the Jewish Question):<br /><ul><li><a href="http://www.amnation.com/vfr/">Lawrence Auster (View From the Right)</a></li></ul>[NOTE: I've put Mr. Auster here because my perception in reading a good fraction (? 80%+) of his writing over the last two years or so, is that he seems to casually dismiss critics of Jewish influence without confronting their arguments. I haven't had time to dig into his archives yet and I notice he's just put up a post, "<a href="http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/012484.html">Anti-Semitism--a collection</a>" covering some of his interactions with possible and actual anti-Semites. I'll try digging through these in the near future and see if and how he has dealt with what I think of as reasonable arguments concerning disproportionate Jewish influence. One of my questions is how does Mr. Auster define anti-Semitism (I'm not sure right now).<br /><br />I am a free-speech advocate who believes the healthiest way to deal with some of the extreme conspiracy theory among various groups of both the Left and Right is to openly and thoroughly discuss the issues, provide evidence, critique fallacies, etc. Of course this can be a very time consuming process so I understand if a particular people like Mr. Auster don't wish to do this over and over.<br /><br />In time I'd like to see some collaborative sites that enable large groups of people to analyze the honesty and truthfulness of various topics, including books like The Critique of Culture, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, etc. Some of these books are extensively documented so it would be possible to have a group of people scan the full context of all the original sources and post them on a web site to provide such an audit that people of good faith can judge. I would think that such a scanning would constitute fair use under US copyright law.]<br /><br />Update 2009-04-08: Added Paul GottfriedScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-44968421819270212822009-02-12T08:11:00.012-05:002009-02-18T19:14:27.618-05:00Our Negligent Civil Defense and Ideas for Improvement<span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Civil_Defense">According to wikipedia</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Since its creation by President <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush" title="George W. Bush">George W. Bush</a> after the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks" title="September 11, 2001 attacks" class="mw-redirect">September 11, 2001 attacks</a>, United States Civil Defense has been concentrated within the cabinet-level <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Homeland_Security" title="Department of Homeland Security" class="mw-redirect">Department of Homeland Security</a> (DHS).</p></blockquote><p>Not surprisingly civil defense is now handled by the Department of Homeland Security.</p></span><span style="font-size:100%;"><span><span class="standardcontent">Let's look at the top five priorities for the new Secretary of Homeland Security:</span></span><br /><br /><a href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm2241.cfm">Homeland Security Secretary Asks—Here Are Answers!</a><br />by James Jay Carafano, Ph.D.<br />January 26, 2009<br /><br /></span><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><blockquote><p>On day one, new Secretary for Homeland Security Janet Napolitano issued a directive requiring her staff to report to her by the end of the month on five top issues. The directive covered:</p> <ul type="disc"><li><i>State and local intelligence sharing</i> (law enforcement's ability to "connect the dots" in looking for terrorist threats);</li><li><i>State, local, and tribal integration</i> (ensuring governance at all levels works together);</li><li><i>Transportation security</i> (assessing what is being done to safeguard air, surface, and maritime transportation);</li><li><i>Risk analysis</i> (determining the most efficacious means to reduce threats and vulnerabilities); and</li><li><i>Critical infrastructure protection</i> (reducing the danger terrorists might destroy or degrade important assets from bridges to computer networks).</li></ul> <p>The secretary wants answers by January 28.</p></blockquote><p>Well that seems like a typically bureaucratic list and certainly each of these issues is worthy of attention but isn't something obvious missing?</p><p>This "obvious item" hasn't been spotted for at least thirty years in US Civil Defense policy: namely, helping the general public thoroughly prepare. Admittedly for relatively minor disasters like floods, hurricanes, etc, the government provides adequate information to the general public.</p><p>But they don't even come close for WMD attacks, especially nuclear attacks.<br /></p><p>In this post I want to focus on nuclear attacks from terrorism or war. <span class="standardcontent"><span><span><span class="standardcontent">I plan to deal with an EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) nuclear attack in a future post. </span></span></span></span></p><p>I think a nuclear attack on the American homeland is nearly inevitable as nuclear weapon technology proliferates broadly, say Iran and another Muslim state or two. Or perhaps Pakistan's nuclear weapons and technology falls under fundamentalist control. Even if nuclear weapons proliferate only to Iran, their leadership might be crazy enough to attempt nuclear attacks against the US via terrorist proxies. Proliferation enables our enemies to use nuclear terrorism with plausible deniability and there is the disturbing possibility that a major nation might attack us covertly to gain advantage while diverting blame onto terrorists or a rogue state.</p><p>This <a href="http://foreignerinformosa.typepad.com/the_foreigner_in_formosa/2006/10/chinese_lebensr.html">alleged statement</a> of a high-level retired Chinese General should not be ignored. I wouldn't be too surprised if some Chinese leaders have long-term genocidal, colonization plans to relieve their population pressure and increase their power and glory.<br /></p><p>Hopefully the government has thoroughly dispersed a variety of our intelligence and national security infrastructure because otherwise an wily enemy could smuggle several tactical and strategic nuclear warheads through our porous borders and detonate them simultaneously at critical facilities like Homeland Security, the FBI, the Pentagon, CIA headquarters, Ft. Meade (NSA) as well as our major cities, military bases and other important targets. I'm sure most of our major national security facilities have at least some hardened bunkers but the loss of a significant fraction of our national security manpower and intelligentsia would be devastating. I suspect that a modest-sized group of ideologically committed Muslim terrorists backed by a government like Iran using scrupulous security protocols may very well be able to pull off such an operation with secrecy. A clever enemy would do data mining and espionage to determine a reasonably set of targets to devastate our ability to recover and respond.</p><p>Maybe I'm missing something, but it sure seems like a <span><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;">simultaneous, </span></span>large nuclear attack by terrorists would NOT be that hard using a small group of people planting bombs with timer/cell phone triggers. God knows our lightly controlled borders and cargo inspection system would not be that hard to breach, particularly by using corrupt payoffs for what is thought to be drug or human smuggling. Only ONE illicit container-sized shipment needs to get across the border. In fact a devastating number of warheads could be smuggled in a lot less than one container.<br /></p></span> <span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><p>The government's strategy for nuclear attack seems to be:</p></span><ol><li><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><p>Prevent the attack (without seriously involving, educating or preparing citizens).<br /></p></span></li><li><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><p><span class="standardcontent">Give citizens a bit of advice that might help some folks on the periphery of any attacks (if we don't suffer a large-scale, simultaneous attack) because the advice is essentially "hunker down or run away somewhere safe" with a few days of emergency supplies.</span></p></span></li><li><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;">Deal with the mess afterward if an attack does succeed (hoping it wasn't a serious attack like 10+ city nuclear attack including all the major ones).<br /></span></li></ol><span style="font-size:100%;">Are You Ready? <a href="http://www.ready.gov/america/_downloads/emergency_preparedness/are_you_ready.pdf">(PDF)</a> (<a href="http://www.ready.gov/america/_downloads/emergency_preparedness/are_you_ready.txt">text</a>)<br /></span><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><p>An examination of the Department of Homeland Security's <a href="http://www.ready.gov/">ready.gov</a> website does include a modest discussion of nuclear attack but the content is quite superficial and provides nothing to CONCRETELY prepare ahead of time, which is vital for survival in most cases if near or downwind from an attack.</p></span><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><p>OK. To be fair the document DOES discuss shelters. Here's the full discussion:<br /></p><blockquote style="font-style: italic;"><p>Taking shelter during a nuclear blast is absolutely necessary. There are two kinds of shelters—blast and fallout. The following describes the two kinds of shelters:<br /></p><ul><li>Blast shelters are specifically constructed to offer some protection<br />against blast pressure, initial radiation, heat, and fire. But even a blast shelter cannot withstand a direct hit from a nuclear explosion.</li><li>Fallout shelters do not need to be specially constructed for protecting against fallout. They can be any protected space, provided that the walls and roof are thick and dense enough to absorb the radiation given off by fallout particles.<br /></li></ul></blockquote></span><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><p>There are NO REFERENCES to any other sources that would provide more details.</p><p>Unless you prepare a shelter ahead of time, then if you're in the path for fallout without adequate shelter, you aren't likely to survive the period of high radiation, which can last for weeks. To the best of my understanding, you might survive without special shelter if you're far enough from the blast and the prevailing winds keep the fallout away from you. If you have significant <span><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;">radiation exposure, you'll get ill and might not survive for long. </span></span>Almost no American basement provides adequate radiation protection, although you could rig up something barely adequate with the proper materials and a little time.<br /></p><p>I have no problem with the government using multiple documents to disseminate knowledge because obviously you can't fit everything into one document. The problem is the ONLY thing that seems to exist for citizens is this high-level document (which is more useful for tornadoes, chemical spills, etc). There are NO detailed followup documents that help with nuclear attacks that I could find; I'm pretty sure they don't exist.</p><p>O<span><span><span class="standardcontent">f course the motivated individual CAN find lots of good data on the web that was published 30-50 years ago when we had a better Office of Civil Defense </span></span></span><span><span><span class="standardcontent">(e.g. details about nuclear weapon effects, how to build a fallout shelter, including some expedient ones).</span></span></span></p><p>Why isn't the government publishing up-to-date information covering the details needed to usefully prepare for nuclear attack?<br /></p><p>A serious civil defense program might include policies like the following:</p></span><ul><li><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><p>Sponsoring R&D and certified testing of a wide variety of fallout and blast shelters designs from cheap-and-adequate to expensive-and-premium with plenty of intermediate models.</p></span></li><li><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;">Publishing plenty of documents on shelter theory, design and construction with ample technical detail aimed at multiple audiences including architects, engineers and the motivated layman.</span><br /></li></ul><ul><li><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;">Publishing plenty of documents filled with detailed survival skills like radiation detector operation, emergency medicine for laymen, decontamination, shelter life, etc.<br /></span></li><li><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><p>Creating building codes and recommendations to encourage builders to incorporate fallout or blast shelters into new structures or retrofit them into existing ones. Ideally there would be standard, proven designs of varying cost that owners could choose based on their budgets. Tax policy could offer incentives for building shelter space and preparedness spending.</p></span></li><li><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;">Encouraging a shift in new houses toward more earth-covered structures designed to provide some innate blast protection at all times. These structures would also have lower energy costs.<br /></span></li><li><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><p>Making some modest and inexpensive changes to building standards if they would substantially improve the survivability or reduce the combustibility of structures at a distance from the blast. At least spread awareness so home buyers can choose these various customizations at their discretion. For example it might be possible to design windows with a coating that lowers the chance that the nuclear flash causes combustibles in a room to ignite (e.g. several miles away ground zero). The idea is improve the overall robustness of our cities with minimal additional cost.</p></span></li><li><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><p>Supporting the creation of several standard, trustworthy, survival packages so average citizens can choose among them based on their budget without needing to master a large body of technical knowledge.</p></span></li><li><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><p>Creating standards for the full spectrum of products related to WMD protection: shelters, air filtration, NBC suits, radiation detectors, energy production, decontamination aids, blast doors, etc.<br /></p></span></li><li><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><p>Supporting the development of EMP-related <span><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;">knowledge and </span></span>technologies. I plan to discuss this in a future post.</p></span></li><li><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><p>Creating vastly improved civil defense warning systems, including detecting nuclear blasts and sending special warnings instantly to the entire surrounding region, giving people on the outskirts of blast zone some time to cover or shelter from the blast wave. Twenty or thirty seconds could save hundreds of thousands of lives and dramatically reduce the severity of injuries which would reduce pressure on emergency medical systems.<br /></p></span></li><li><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><p>Encouraging the creation of a civil defense industry that manufactures trustworthy, standard products like air filtration systems, power supplies for shelters, shelter design and construction, blast doors, etc.</p></span></li><li><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;">Making sure we have a two-way communication system that keeps shelter residents in contact with each other and the authorities.</span></li></ul><ul><li>Creating hardened infrastructure throughout all our major cities, like vital services, public shelters, tunnel complexes, etc.</li></ul><ul><li>Creating local community organizations, plans and infrastructure.</li></ul><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"></span><ul><li><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;">Encouraging industry to harden their facilities and operations to recover more quickly after an attack, particularly when creating new facilities so the cost isn't prohibitive.<br /></span></li></ul><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;"><p>I see the creation of this sort of civil defense infrastructure as "physical" insurance, particularly on a societal level. It won't guarantee individual survival, but it would certainly have a significant impact on keeping more of our citizens alive with fewer severe injuries AND making our society more robust in the aftermath of an attack. It would almost certainly help the county psychologically, since many more people would have practical survival knowledge and would have made significant, useful preparations. Current levels of ignorance and lack of survival infrastructure will likely lead to serious panic after an attack.<br /></p><p>Much of cost for developing and deploying this could be amortized over decades so the cost isn't prohibitive and a large civil defense industry could lower costs using economies of scale. More robust structures could replace obsolete ones according to the natural replacement schedule.<br /></p><p>I suspect a good fraction of families might not mind adding say $10,000 to the cost of their house and spending a few hundred dollars per year if it substantially improved their safety from this catastrophic risk (these are my somewhat made up numbers but I think they're in the right ballpark for adequate protection).<br /></p><p>The main goals are to start spreading greater awareness and increasing our ability to weather these probable attacks. Affordable, decades-long improvement is better than the current lethargy and complete unpreparedness by the vast majority of citizens.</p><p>One benefit of pursuing a vigorous civil defense program is its deterrent effect on would-be attackers, since the greater our survivability, the more likely we'd be back on our feet after an attack, hopefully able to identify the attackers (e.g. using various scientific and intelligence techniques) and retaliate <span><span class="standardcontent" style="font-size:100%;">punishingly</span></span>.<br /></p><p>If we suffer a horrible attack with our current negligent preparation, I believe the survivors will be furious at our leadership and <span><span><span class="standardcontent">government </span></span></span>legitimacy may well be lost (particularly considering how many other trends are undermining public trust already).</p></span><span style="font-size:100%;"><p>We'd better stop assuming the government will always stop the attack and start preparing the general public to cope with successful attacks.</p><p><br /></p></span>ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-13037033842768727322009-02-11T02:37:00.005-05:002009-02-12T21:10:52.142-05:00Long Comment on Roissy about US and Western DeclineI've posted a long comment on Roissy's blog detailing many trends I interpret as decline for America and the West.<br /><br /><a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/02/09/obamas-women-part-2/#comment-50519">LINK<br /><br /></a>I also engage in some subsequent conversations mostly related to this post.<br /><br />I intend to break up this long comment into smaller, more detailed blog entries and will use this post as the "table of contents" for that effort.<br /><br />I also intend to create a list of indicators of American and Western Decline and welcome community input to sharpen the accuracy of this list, including dissenting opinions.<br /><br />I'll link all these goodies from this post as I develop them.<br /><br />I'm just a dude who's got a certain level of understanding trying his best within his own limitations to figure out what the *bleep* is going on, why and what should be done to deal with that. I think most other folks are in a similar boat. I don't pretend to have all the answers. Please enlighten me if you think I'm full of it.<br /><br />Eventually I'd like to explore creating a community site that allows more decentralized collaboration (i.e. get's me out of the middle). I like to err on the side of free speech and letting everyone's contributions speak for themselves, good or bad, although perhaps enabling some tools to allow individuals to filter out those they find extremely time-wasting without preventing others from listening to their messages.ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-2216646921208325682009-02-08T18:02:00.007-05:002009-02-09T01:13:53.631-05:00Disclaimer: Group ReasoningAs I explore various societal issues, I might engage in "group reasoning" about groups like Americans, Westerners, Jews, Gentiles, Christians, Whites and Blacks. Different aspects may contribute to group reasoning, including group variations in ability, identity, beliefs, behavior, culture, cohesion and so on.<br /><br />Plenty of folks, including many <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiteness_studies">scholars</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremiah_Wright">activists</a>, have <span style="font-weight: bold;">NO PROBLEM</span> employing group reasoning <span style="font-weight: bold;">ON</span> Whites, so Whites (and others) should have no problem using similar logic and analytical techniques as long as we do so honestly and with a healthy skepticism for any limitations.<br /><br />Groups are an important facet of human reality and must be openly and honestly confronted to make sense of the World.<br /><br />Science proves that some genuine differences exist between different races and ethnic groups, and for some traits and groups, these average differences may be substantial, at least when examining large populations. Of course depending on the traits and the groups involved, there may or may not be any significant differences, and for pretty much <span style="font-weight: bold;">ANY</span> trait and collection of groups, the individual variations for particular individuals can <span style="font-weight: bold;">DRAMATICALLY</span> override the average group differences.<br /><br />One well-known group difference is that the mean IQ of Ashkenazi Jews is likely between <a href="http://www.vdare.com/sailer/050605_iq.htm">perhaps 112-115 , </a>which is significantly higher than White mean of 100 and the African-American mean of 85. Clearly at least part of Jewish intellectual excellence and practical achievement follows from this.<br /><br />NOTE: I've seen conflicting values for mean Ashkenazi Jewish IQ; the point is there is a specific value that is probably between 107 and 115 and that its value is significantly higher than 100. It's the job of psychometricians to pin down the value down (and they may have done so without my layman's knowledge).<br /><br />Another facet of group reasoning relates to participation by the group in the wider society to pursue their group interests using the full range of political, media, cultural, social, economic, psychological, intellectual and other possible levers of power and influence. In this context to talk about a group's action can be a bit slippery for several reasons, including:<br /><ul><li>Typically many group members are not directly involved, in fact, a large portion of the group may not be aware of what is transpiring in its name and may not even be sympathetic to the policies pursued in their name. Usually a smaller, elite fraction of the group drives much of the group behavior, although as a general rule, they do typically follow some rough consensus or have support from the mass of the group.</li><li>Different factions exist with different ideas, values, motivations, and disagreements between factions are common.</li><li>Not everything a group tends to pursue may be relentlessly focused on advancing group interests.<br /></li></ul>Whites are a group containing subgroups with extremely diverse and bitterly divided ideologies, and are particularly unusual since, overwhelmingly, White elites consider it racist for Whites to explicitly consider, articulate or pursue their own group interests, <span style="font-weight: bold;">UNLIKE</span> every other racial and ethnic group in America today. I consider this a hypocritical double standard that needs to be overturned. Essentially the dominant and powerful Whites work against non-elite White interests in conjunction with powerful Jewish and non-White interests.<br /><br />In contrast there is broad agreement within some other communities between otherwise divided factions to vigorously pursue their own group interests. Jews and Blacks are the quintessential examples even though some dissenters, usually vehemently excoriated, exist within these groups.<br /><br />I don't want to belabor this. I just want to acknowledge the trickiness of properly understanding the relationship between group and individual. The breakout of divergent group factions can be done when appropriate. When examining group tendencies there will almost always be specific counterexamples, but this doesn't detract from the larger point about groups having statistically significant differences.<br /><br />In short: If non-Whites get a pony, Whites do too.ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-9513216558903400322009-02-03T16:31:00.004-05:002009-02-15T17:42:32.426-05:00Original Giant PostUpdate: 2009-02-12: See: <a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/02/some-jews-supportive-of-white-advocacy.html">Some Jews Supportive of White Advocacy</a><br /><br />------------------------<br />Original Post Below<br />------------------------<br /><br />This post follows up a <a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/my-inaugural-balls/#comment-48600">discussion</a> from a thread on the thought-provoking <a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/">Roissy In DC</a> blog.<br /><br />I had started participating in that thread with this initial <a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/my-inaugural-balls/#comment-48403">post</a>.<br /><br />[NOTE: Over the next week or so, I plan to break this post up into more focused chunks and point to those more narrow posts from this "parent post" adding a few additional notes. After that I'll try to get my posts more polished initially.]<br /><br />Disclaimer: When I say "Jew" and "Jewish" I'm referring to ethnicity and not religion. I'll specify some term like "religious Jew" if needed. In fact many Jewish activists are actually atheists. Also, in some cases these folks may consider their activism to be, say, "Liberal" or "Conservative", rather than "Jewish" and they may or may not be conscious of serving Jewish group interests. And certainly not everything a Jewish person or group does is oriented toward serving Jewish group interests.<br /><br /><a href="http://diariesofasimite.blogspot.com/">Seeking Alpha</a>:<br /><blockquote>Scotch, a couple questions:<br /><br />How does this grand conspiracy help Jews? I see how it helps the rich, and that the two overlap, but how specifically the Jews?<br /><br />How does it help the Jews?<br /></blockquote>Here's a quote from one Jewish activist (from <a href="http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/CofCchap7+Ref.pdf">Chapter 7</a> of "Culture of Critique"):<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.</span> <span style="font-style: italic;">We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible—and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever.</span> (Earl Raab, Jewish Bulletin, 1993 February 19, 23)<br /><br />Obviously Mr. Raab believes Jews will be safer by living in a multicultural society where the share of the population of non-Jewish Whites is much smaller and has lost its hegemony over society. This is clearly totally unrelated to wealth but directly related to perceived Jewish safety.<br /><br />I don't believe there is a "grand conspiracy" by Jews, but it is undeniable that various Jewish individuals and groups have pursued a broad spectrum of policies that have harmed the traditional population of this country and its social, cultural, religious and moral order, while benefiting the Jewish community and Israel. I think it is clear that in many cases these ethnic Jewish actors were motivated by their perceived group interests as Jews and did NOT mind the weakening and displacement of White Gentiles.<br /><br />In fact this weakening appears to be the raison d'etre behind the traditional, nearly universal Jewish support for unrestricted mass immigration from 3rd world countries. Recently some <a href="http://www.vdare.com/misc/epstein_steinlight.htm">thoughful Jews</a> are questioning the wisdom of mass Muslim immigration (<span style="font-weight: bold;">because it's bad for Jews</span>).<br /><br />From: <a href="http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/back404.html"><span style="font-size:100%;">High Noon to Midnight: Why Current Immigration Policy Dooms American Jewry</span></a> by Dr. Stephen M. Steinlight<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;font-size:100%;" >Thus, behind closed doors, Jewish leaders speak a different language. This is not entirely new with immigration, but the gulf is now a chasm. Privately they express grave concern that unregulated immigration will prove ruinous to American Jewry, as it has for French Jewry, and will for Jews throughout Western Europe. There’s particular fear about the <span style="font-weight: bold;">impact on Jewish security</span>, as well as <span style="font-weight: bold;">American support for Israel</span>, of the rapid growth of the Muslim population. At the conclusion of meetings with national leaders, several told me, "You’re 1000 percent right, but I can’t go out and say it yet." While they have yet to find the civic courage to <span style="font-weight: bold;">break with the traditional consensus</span> they can</span><span style="font-style: italic;font-size:100%;" > see the Rubicon glinting in the distance, and many recognize that eventually they will have to cross it.</span><br /><br />Note: there is a smattering of Jews who seem to support controlled immigration for the broader interests of the country, like <a href="http://www.steinreport.com/">Dan Stein</a>.<br /><br />Another Jewish-dominated movement from the early 20th century was the banning of Christian prayer, symbols and belief from public schools which had been customary since the founding of the country. <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=DAjhp_1XlZwC&pg=PA21&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=0_0">Are you denying this</a>? (Jewish Power, J. J. Goldberg, p. 21)<br /><br />Are Gentiles forbidden to notice the numerous lawsuits brought by Jews and Jewish or crypto-Jewish (e.g. the ACLU) organizations that effected these radical changes? It is significant because the Christian-based morality historically taught in public schools has been replaced by postmodern, politically correct relativism in many schools. This is the infamous Cultural Marxism mostly developed by Leftist Jewish intellectuals; see <a href="http://www.csulb.edu/%7Ekmacd/books.htm">The Culture of Critique</a> for extensive documentation).<br /><br />So instead of punishing students for chewing gum and smoking like fifty years ago, our schools cope with slightly more serious hijinks, like murders, rapes and violent gangs. Every day, in every way, it's getting better and better!!!<br /><br />Whites children are taught a cartoon version of history where their ancestors are the ONLY baddies and should be reviled while every other ethnicity should be celebrated for their innocence and authenticity.<br /><br />Those <a href="http://www.aina.org/news/2006100394917.htm">millions of black men that were castrated</a> before being shipped to <a href="http://galliawatch.blogspot.com/2008/06/arab-muslim-slave-trade.html">slavery in the Arab World</a>? Move along, <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/slavery/index.html">nothing to see</a>! <a href="http://school.discoveryeducation.com/schooladventures/slavery/">Down the memory hole</a>!<br /><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_trade">From Wikipedia</a>:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">The Arab slave trade from East Africa is one of the oldest slave trades, predating the European transatlantic slave trade by hundreds of years.</span><sup style="font-style: italic;" id="cite_ref-29" class="reference"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_trade#cite_note-29" title=""><span>[</span>30<span>]</span></a></sup><span style="font-style: italic;"> Male slaves <span style="font-weight: bold;">who were often made </span></span><a style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eunuchs" title="Eunuchs" class="mw-redirect">eunuchs</a> were employed as servants, soldiers, or laborers by their owners, while female slaves, including those from Africa, were long traded to the Middle Eastern countries and kingdoms by Arab and Oriental traders, as <a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concubines" title="Concubines" class="mw-redirect">concubines</a><span style="font-style: italic;"> and servants.</span><br /><br />Also, the youth curricula linked above don't have an iota about the Jewish role in American slavery, which was NOT non-existent. But that's not surprising, the dominant Jewish narrative seems to be there aren't any <a href="http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html">black spots </a>in Jewish history and Jews themselves never do anything <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Esaus-Tears-Modern-Anti-Semitism-Rise/dp/0521795389">to contribute</a> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Jewish-Century-Yuri-Slezkine/dp/0691127603">to anti-Semitism</a>. The typical Jewish anti-Semitism book essentially asserts that Jews are sinless naifs incessantly persecuted without cause by evil, jealous, irrational Gentiles. I think more Jews need to sincerely look within and acknowledge that they have sometimes harmed other groups through their activism and behavior, and they need to atone for this just as those who transgress unfairly against Jews should do likewise.<br /><br />Most Jewish activists have a hypocritical, double-standard of promoting a Universalist, deracinated, secular multiculturalism for the US and Western countries BUT NOT FOR ISRAEL! Israel gets to be an ethnocentric Jewish nation that includes legalized discrimination against its own indigenous non-Jewish minorities and that essentially restricts immigration to Jews. Again, a quick google search will lead to voluminous details.<br /><br />Particularly hypocritical is the attempt to deconstruct, undermine and attack the ethnic identity of Whites and to prevent them from organizing for their own group interests (racial realism). Many Jewish organizations like the ADL and the SPLC act as politically correct enforcers attempting to crush Whites who are just trying to organize in a manner that is allowed and encouraged FOR EVERY OTHER RACIAL AND ETHNIC GROUP. Of course no other group is as well-organized, well-funded and aggressive in pursuing their own interests as Jews.<br /><br />Racial Realism means that Whites should look out for their own interests like everyone else is doing. The variant that seems most just to me is that Whites should have the same rights and respect as other groups, no more or no less, and that traditional Freedom of Association is restored so there can have ethnic enclaves not subject to neighborhood busting by sleazy developers. Likewise other groups can have their own sanctuaries. Of course in such a society there could also be many public spaces that were integrated as well, probably a majority.<br /><br />White Supremacists believe that Whites are superior to other races and that Whites should conquer and dominate other groups.<br /><br /><br />I disagree with this position and am inspired by the <a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Solzhenitsyn#Harvard_University_address_.281978.29">following quote</a> from Alexsandr Solzhenitsyn:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">In recent times it has been fashionable to talk of the levelling of nations, of the disappearance of different races in the melting-pot of contemporary civilization. I do not agree with this opinion, but its discussion remains another question. Here it is merely fitting to say that the disappearance of nations would have impoverished us no less than if all men had become alike, with one personality and one face. </span><b style="font-style: italic;">Nations are the wealth of mankind, its collective personalities; the very least of them wears its own special colours and bears within itself a special facet of divine intention.</b><br /><br />I think it is crystal clear that those two concepts are quite different. Racial Realism just says that if we're going to have a multicultural society, then Whites have same groups rights as everyone else: no better or no worse.<br /><br />Right now America has a hypocritical system that is strongly biased AGAINST Whites and FOR ANYBODY BUT Whites. I'm fed up with these dishonest double standards and believe the more that Whites are belittled, discriminated against, demonized by Hollywood, the MSM, the Diversity Industry and the Youth and Higher Education Industry, and besieged by grossly disproportionate crime from the Black Thug subclass and to a lesser extent by Hispanics, the magnitude and details of which is covered up by our "journalists", the more Whites will give up on the Color-Blind society, as I have, since, for the most part, ONLY Whites have pursued it in good faith.<br /><br />It is clear that the more power Whites have relinquished, the more sacrifices we've made and the more we've let ourselves be displaced by 3rd World immigration, the WORSE our treatment. Why should we keep enabling this rotten, hateful system?<br /><br />Our society even allows OPENLY RACIST groups like La Raza and OPENLY SUPREMACIST groups like MEChA to receive public funds and operate on college campuses while prohibiting NON-RACIST White ethnocentric groups. On campuses members of those racist organizations are not shunned and persecuted the way a corresponding White racist or supremacist would be.<br /><br />Janet Murguia of La Raza appears regularly in the mainstream media and is treated with respect, while White racialists, like Jared Taylor, don't get airtime except when framed as an evil, bigoted Nazi to be held in the highest contempt. This is a hypocritical, double standard.<br /><br />Oddly enough Jewish ethnocentrists like Dr. Alan Dershowitz DON'T receive the same treatment. Dr. Dershowitz is passionately concerned with Jews ethnic survival and participates in organized groups to address this grave worry. That is perfectly reasonable and laudable! But don't accuse Whites of bigotry and agitate for legal oppression against ONLY Whites to suppress them the doing exact logical equivalent for their own people and interests!<br /><br /><a href="http://diariesofasimite.blogspot.com/">Seeking Alpha</a>:<br /><blockquote>How does your theory fit with the fact that many of the proponents of your stated theories aren’t Jewish? Is it secret mind control? Kennedy was behind the Immigration Act, no? Rumsfeld and Bush led the current charge on Iraq, and from what I’ve read there was plenty of hawks in the Clinton administration as well. <p>I just don’t see the motive. The only motives I see (I don’t agree with them, but the argument can be made) are ways these things help the rich.</p></blockquote>I dispute your claim that "many of the proponents of your stated theories aren’t Jewish".<br /><br />Most of these changes have been pushed predominantly by Jews. Depending on the issue the Jewish contribution can vary from moderate to overwhelming; I believe in going with whatever the facts are as well as they can be ascertained. For example, if Jews were 3% of the population but applied 80% of the force behind a certain movement, I'd call that EXTREMELY disproportionate. Even if they provided say 20% of the force, that would be fairly disproportionate but at least there would still be broad societal consensus. For most of these issues, I'd say the Jewish contribution is over 40-50%, particularly when you factor in their intellectual and cultural leadership and disproportionate influence over Hollywood, the media, government, business, education and academia which act as force multipliers by inculcating Gentiles toward supporting Jewish interests.<br /><br />Decades of anti-White and anti-Christian propaganda from OVERWHELMINGLY Jewish-controlled Hollywood have had an impact.<br /><br />See: Joel Stein, "<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column">How Jewish is Hollywood</a>" and Steve Sailer's <a href="http://isteve.blogspot.com/2008/12/joel-stein-asks-how-jewish-is-hollywood.html">take</a> on this story.<br /><br />Gotta love Mr. Stein's conclusion:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">I appreciate Foxman's concerns. And maybe my life spent in a New Jersey-New York/Bay Area-L.A. pro-Semitic cocoon has left me naive. <span style="font-weight: bold;">But I don't care if Americans think we're running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.</span></span><br /><br />A truly vicious piece of anti-White and anti-Christian hatred is "<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0366551/">Harold & Kumar Go To White Castle</a>". I'm planning a detailed analysis of this in a future post. The short answer is that pretty much ALL the Whites EXCEPT THE THREE JEWS (including the hippie drug dealer) are vicious, moronic, perverted, psychotic, thuggish, backwards, corrupt, racist, cruel or some other undesirable trait. Of course, the innocent black guy falsely jailed by a vicious, racist cop is saintly, the Korean and Hindu protagonists are cool dudes, as are the Jewish dudes, and, oh yeah, a group of Asians dorks turn out to be cool too. They drag Christianity through the mud with pure malice. Naturally the producer, directors and writers are all Jews.<br /><br />When I accessed this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_%26_Kumar_Go_to_White_Castle">Wikipedia page for the movie</a> [on 2009-01-30 early AM EST], there is NO HINT that the movie might be biased against whites, although if one looks in the discussion and history it appears someone tried to get this in there, but was wiki-censored.<br /><br />The simple test of double standards is whether our glorious PC commissars would change their opinion (Funny! Brilliant! Subversively Transgressive!) if various identities are interchanged (Unfunny! Viciously Racist! White Supremacist!). Hmm... Would the reception have been different if black characters were swapped with the white characters? Can you say "100 alarm riots in 100 hoods"? How about swapping Judiasm for Christianity? I'm sure the ADL, the SPLC and hundreds of other Jewish organization would be DELIGHTED with the witty sendup! NOT!!!<br /><br />OK. Back to the Neocons.<br /><br />Typically Jewish-led movements in Gentile host societies like having some Gentiles around, but usually they're the second string followers or "beards" like George W. Bush and NOT the central drivers and theorists. Kevin MacDonald discusses this extensively in "<a href="http://www.csulb.edu/%7Ekmacd/books.htm">The Culture of Critique</a>".<br /><br />If you think George W. Bush "led the current charge on Iraq", that is, if he actually created and developed the doctrine and strategy, there's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swamp">some scenic lakefront land</a> in Florida selling on e-Bay real cheap! It's a REAL STEAL!<br /><br />"<a href="http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=280279&contrassID=2&subContrassID=14&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y">White man's burden</a>" by Ari Shavit in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz discusses the Neocons:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">In the course of the past year, a new belief has emerged in the town: the belief in war against Iraq. <span style="font-weight: bold;">That ardent faith was disseminated by a small group of 25 or 30 neoconservatives, almost all of them Jewish</span>, almost all of them intellectuals (a partial list: Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Eliot Abrams, Charles Krauthammer), people who are mutual friends and cultivate one another and are convinced that political ideas are a major driving force of history. </span><br /><br />A quick google search on neoconservative, jewish and "iraq war" will lead to many sources that provide great detail on this. Also, I gave some good initial books and some of the key players in my previous <a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/my-inaugural-balls/#comment-48403">post</a>.<br /><br />The following article in <span style="font-style: italic;">The American Conservative</span> magazine discusses the Neoconservatives including their role in promoting mass immigration for the US and in purging traditional conservatives (paleoconservatives) out of mainstream conservative media:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.amconmag.com/article/2003/apr/21/00007/">Among the Neocons: A foot soldier in the ideological wars relates</a> by Scott McConnell<br /><br />Justin Raimondo discusses the history of the Neocons <a href="http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j052303.html">here</a>.<br /><br />Some of the dissidents banished by the Neocons include Peter Brimelow, Joseph Sobran and Steve Sailer while others like John O'Sullivan gelded themselves to preserve their careers.<br /><br />By the late 90s National Review had gotten very Neocon and Jewish and the remaining Gentiles knew they'd better not cross you-know-who if they wanted a home in "respectable media": that's the stick. Notice how Victor Davis Hanson's career skyrocketed (in Neocon controlled media) when he mouthed an extreme form of Neocon warmongering and 100% autonomic support for Israel: that's the carrot.<br /><br />Check out the article: "<a href="http://www.jewcy.com/dialogue/02-27/is_kevin_macdonald_right">Is Kevin MacDonald Right?</a>" on jewcy.com which is an e-mail exchange between Joey Kurtzman and John Derbyshire which includes a discussion of Jewish power and influence in the media. This article is a gold mine. Here are two excerpts from John Derbyshire:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.jewcy.com/dialogue/02-27/wrestling_with_derbyshires_law">First Excerpt</a>:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;color:black;" >Working back through your questions: Yes, indeed I was, and am, “afraid of offending Jews.” Of course I am! For a person like myself, a Gentile who is a very minor name in American opinion journalism, desirous of ascending to some slightly less minor status, ticking off Jews is a very, very bad career strategy. I approached the MacDonald review with great trepidation. I gave my honest opinion, of course—the entire point of my line of work is to speak your mind and get paid for it—but I’ll admit I was nervous. Reading the review again, I think it shows. </span><br /><br /><a href="http://www.jewcy.com/dialogue/02-28/be_nice_or_well_crush_you">Second Excerpt</a>:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;color:black;" >To your next point (I am working from the bottom up again) that my professed fear of ticking off Jews is some kind of affectation or pose, I can only assure you that this is not so. Almost the first thing you hear from old hands when you go into opinion journalism in the U.S. is, to put it in the precise form I first heard it: “Don’t f*ck with the Jews.” (Though I had better add here that I was mixing mainly with British expats at that point, and the comment came from one of them. More on this in a moment.)</span><p style="font-style: italic;" class="MsoNormal"> </p> <p style="font-style: italic;" class="MsoNormal"> <span style="color:black;">Joe Sobran expressed it with his usual h</span><span style="color:black;">yperbole: “You must only ever write of us as a passive, powerless, historically oppressed minority, struggling to maintain our ancient identity in a world where all the odds are against us, poor helpless us, poor persecuted and beleaguered us! Otherwise we will smash you to pieces.” </span> </p>You can read between the lines of Derbyshire's contributions to sense his fear and caution to make sure he doesn't go too far in discussing this taboo. He also makes sure to add some sycophantic praise. Note: Mr. Derbyshire also writes some fine books for the general public discussing advanced mathematical ideas and history; I'm sure if he wants to continue getting these book contracts with major publishers that will be promoted in the major bookstores he knows he'd better be careful (Kevin MacDonald was banished from the major publishers).<br /><br />Here's some <a href="http://www.vdare.com/misc/070321_cleburne.htm">discussion of this infamous e-mail exchange</a> by Patrick Cleburne.<br /><br />Anyone researching Neoconservatism, the Iraq War and Democracy-At-The-Point-Of-A-Gun-For-Arab-And-Muslim-Regimes-That-Are-Threats-To-Israel quickly finds that NEARLY ALL of the principle players were Jewish. George W. Bush was the nominal leader but was completely owned by this well-organized group of highly motivated ideologues. Try swimming through the sea of Jewish and Gentile-tool Neocon op-eds from after September 11th through the first few years of the Iraq War (there are probably thousands). I read through hundreds at the time and was complete Neocon tool for years. Their goals dovetailed neatly with what they considered to be in Israel's best interest by destroying the regimes considered most dangerous to Israel (Iraq, Syria and Iran).<br /><br />Again, I'm not claiming all of these movements and actions are 100% Jewish, only that Jews have an extremely disproportionate influence. "<a href="http://www.csulb.edu/%7Ekmacd/books.htm">The Culture of Critique</a>" explores this in great depth.<br /><br />Most disturbing is how a group of ideologues who put Israel's interest before America's were and are allowed to hold so many important government positions. And because it's now considered politically incorrect to discriminate in any way against foreign origin or ethnicity, our national security bureaucracies are filled with people of various backgrounds that may retain a higher loyalty to their ethnostate, like China, or alien religion, like Islam, which deeply compromises our security, unlike our various competitors that are unapologetically ethnocentric and lack legions of lawyers salivating over giant payouts for discrimination lawsuits. They'd better get with the multicultural program! Oh, they're non-White? How dare you corrupt their authentic culture!<br /><br />A significant factor in Allied victory in World War II was our breaking of the Japanese and German codes which gave us great insight into their plans. If our government and society are infiltrated by hundreds or thousands of moles and operatives working for our enemies BEFORE and DURING wartime, we're open to intelligence breaches and attacks of shocking devastation, particularly in this era of WMDs. Most Americans don't appreciate our vulnerability since we haven't suffered a bloody war on our soil since the Civil War.<br /><br />America will likely suffer grievous harm in the next two decades because of this.<br /><br /><a href="http://diariesofasimite.blogspot.com/">Seeking Alpha</a>:<br /><blockquote>Kennedy was behind the Immigration Act, no?</blockquote>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965">Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965</a> was sponsored by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanuel_Celler">Emanuel Celler</a>, a Jewish Congressman from New York well known for promoting massive immigration since he was first seated in 1923. Sure, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kennedy">Ted Kennedy</a> was a great supporter of of the 1965 Immigration Act but he was far from the being its primary cause. Other Jewish legislators like Senator <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_K._Javits">Jacob Javits</a> of New York also played a significant role in passing this act.<br /><br />According to Wikipedia (and Kevin MacDonald agrees):<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">He [Jacob Javits] was also one of the main forces behind the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act that by removing immigration quota that favored Western European nations helped to make the U.S. a truly diverse and multicultural country.</span><br /><br />Please read <a href="http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/CofCchap7+Ref.pdf">Chapter 7</a> of Kevin MacDonald's "<a href="http://www.csulb.edu/%7Ekmacd/books.htm">The Culture of Critique</a>". It lays out in great detail how Jewish organizations have forcefully and consistently pushed for mass immigration into this country. This book is heavily referenced and footnoted and includes a massive bibliography. It would be easy for a group to consult each of his original sources, excerpt a large segment around his reference and then let careful readers decide if he's been honest in his quoting and interpretation of these sources.ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5335225799942938922.post-71696750609633016822009-01-29T19:32:00.009-05:002009-02-18T19:13:49.806-05:00A General Discussion of Jewish Influence in Response to Some QuestionsThis post follows up a <a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/my-inaugural-balls/#comment-48600">discussion</a> from a thread on the thought-provoking <a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/">Roissy In DC</a> blog.<br /><br />I had started participating in that thread with this initial <span style="text-decoration: underline;"></span><a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/my-inaugural-balls/#comment-48403">post</a>.<br /><br />2009-02-03:<br /><br />I've removed the bulk of this post for now because I want to divide it into smaller, focused, independent pieces.<br /><br />I also want to improve its tone because my goal is not to rant (at least not too much!), but hopefully be constructive.<br /><br />I plan to post new-and-hopefully-improved chunks as each is done and to edit this post to act as a table of contents.<br /><br />Also, I'm planning to post soon on other topics like Civil Defense, Why I Gave up on the Color Blind Society, and so on. I want this blog to discuss a broad range of topics although the overarching theme is concern for the state of the US, the West and Whites.<br /><br />2009-02-09:<br /><br />See: <a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/02/disclaimer-group-reasoning.html">Disclaimer: Group Reasoning</a><br /><br />2009-02-10:<br /><br />This is the original huge post I'm in the process of editing into smaller pieces. I guess I'll leave it here for reference.<br /><br />See: <a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/02/original-giant-post.html">Original Giant Post</a><br /><br />2009-02-12<br /><br />See: <a href="http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/02/some-jews-supportive-of-white-advocacy.html">Some Jews Supportive of White Advocacy</a>ScotchFiendhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305353862849309788noreply@blogger.com5